Characterization of the Operator Cognitive State Using Response Times During Semiautonomous Weapon Task Assignment
Abstract
The increase in autonomy of unmanned systems is projected to continue in the foreseeable future. As a result, a single operator may be expected to monitor and control several unmanned systems. The US Air Force’s Warfighter Interface Division conducted a simulation and testing with human in the loop. Their objective was to examine target acquisition performance for unaided human operators with that of an automated cooperative controller in accomplishing a complex task involving the prosecution of ground-based targets with wide area search munitions (WASMs). Their experiments provided empirical data on a humans ability to manage multiple tasks with varying mental task difficulty. The concept of the response time (RT) is often used by psychologists and neuroscientists to better understand cognitive and corresponding neural processes. Recently, the RTs have been shown to be correlated with the cognitive task difficulty. Based on these findings, a new approach for assigning task difficulty during multitasking experiments is introduced. The approach constructs a monotonously increasing mapping of the operator’s RT data into the corresponding task difficulty levels with a continuous range of values.
Keywords
Operator cognitive state Response times Weapon-task assignmentNotes
Acknowledgements
A. Kammerdiner and P. Berg-Yuen gratefully acknowledge support from the national research council (NRC) Postdoctoral Fellowship Program.
References
- 1.Cannon, J.A.: Statistical analysis and algorithms for online change detection in real-time psychophysiological data, Thesis, University of Iowa (2009)Google Scholar
- 2.Cannon, J.A., Krokhmal, P.A., Lenth, R.V., Murphey, R.: An algorithm for online detection of temporal changes in operator cognitive state using real-time psychophysiological data. Biomed. Signal Process. Contr. 5(3), 229–236 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Cannon, J.A., Krokhmal, P.A., Chen, Y., Murphey, R.: Detection of temporal changes in psychophysiological data using statistical process control methods. Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. 102(2) (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Chhikara, R.S., Folks, L.: The inverse Gaussian distribution as a lifetime model. Technometrics 19(4), 461–468 (1977)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chhikara, R.S., Folks, L.: The Inverse Gaussian Distribution: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York (1989)Google Scholar
- 6.Heathcote, A., Brown, S., Mewhort, D.J.K.: Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9, 394–401 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Holden, J.G., Van Orden, G.C., Turvey, M.T.: Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. Psychol. Rev. 116(2), 318–342 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Link, S.W.: The Wave Theory of Difference and Similarity. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
- 9.Luce, R.D.: Response Times. Oxford University Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
- 10.Murata, A., Nishijima, K.: Evaluation of drowseness by EEG analysis – Basic Study on ITS Development for the Prevention of Drowsy Driving. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Computational Intelligence & Applications, 95–98 (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Ratcliff, R.: A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9, 278–291 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Russell, M.: Unmanned Systems: Can the Industrial Base Support the Pentagon’s Vision? National Defense magazine, July 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Storms, G., Delbeke, L.: The irrelevance of distributional assumptions on reaction times in multidimensional scaling of same/different judgment tasks. Psychometrika 57(4), 559–614 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Van Zandt, T.: How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 7(3), 424–465 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wagenmakers, E.-J., Grasman, R.P.P.P., Molenaar, P.C.M.: On the relation between the mean and the variance of a diffusion model response time distribution, J. Math. Psychol. 49, 195–204 (2005)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wagenmakers, E.-J., Brown, S.: On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychol. Rev., 114(3), 830–841 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wilson, G.E., Russell, C.: Operator functional state classification using neural networks with combined physiological and performance features. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, 1099–1101 (1999)Google Scholar
- 18.Warfield, L., Carretta, T.R., Patzek, M.J., Estepp, J.R., O’Neal, J.K.: Comparing Manual and Cooperative Control Mission Management Methods for Wide Area Search Munitions, AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2009-0021, Final Report, AFOSR (2009)Google Scholar
- 19.Wilson, G.E., Russell, C.: Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding. Hum. Factors 49(6), 1005–1018 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar