Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Cybernetics and Informatics pp 269-275 | Cite as
The Application of Psychology in the Production of Multimedia Courseware
Abstract
Some of the ads for psychology theory in the teaching of multimedia courseware making a direct role, can make multimedia courseware can have a advertisement effect, can always attract the attention of the learners, arouse their interest and strengthen the memory, so that the student’s in classroom feeling, perceived ability is developed, and really improve the quality of teaching. As a teaching auxiliary multimedia means to be used in the psychology of teaching, solve the psychology is “a very little” contradiction, reform teaching methods, the best choice of psychology, also is the only way. How to better use of modern multimedia technology, play to its advantage, to be abstract concepts into image visual graphics, change is far near, for the static dynamic, change small is great, control all kinds of information media used for the teaching. Teaching workers should pay attention to the problem.
Keywords
Multimedia Courseware Psychology Information Processing Teaching modeReferences
- 1.Tolhurst D (1995) Hypertext, hypermedia, multimedia defined? Educ Technol 3:21–26Google Scholar
- 2.Neo M, Neo TK (2000) Multimedia learning: using multimedia as a platform for instruction and learning in higher education. In: Proceedings of the multimedia university international symposium of information and communication technologies, Shanghai, vol 10, pp 4–6Google Scholar
- 3.Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:8l–97lCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mayer RE, Moreno R (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 38:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Mayer RE, Sobko K, Mautone PD (2003) Social cues in multimedia learning: role of speaker’s voice. J Educ Psychol 95:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Atkinson RK (2002) Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. J Educ Psychol 94:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar