Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)



The Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is an instrumental assessment of deglutitive function that utilizes a flexible laryngoscope to view pharyngeal and laryngeal structures during swallowing. In this assessment the laryngoscope is placed transnasally and advanced to the pharynx to view structural movements, bolus transit and airway protection. The chapter elucidates the utility and practical application of laryngoscopy to assess swallowing function for the practicing clinician. The chapter includes a description of the procedure and guides the reader in the integration of visual findings that are revealed via the laryngoscope to better identify disordered physiology and further patient management.


  1. 1.
    Sawashima M, Hirose H. New laryngoscopic technique by use of fiber optics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968;43:168–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langmore S, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langmore S, Schatz K, Olsen N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bastian R. Videoendoscopic evaluation of patients with dysphagia: an adjunct to the modified barium swallow. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104:339–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    FDA Public Health Advisory. FDA Public Health Advisory: Reports of Blue Discoloration and Death in Patients Receiving Enteral Feedings Tinted With The Dye, FD&C Blue No.1. 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leder S, Acton L, Lisitano H, Murray J. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) with and without blue dyed food. Dysphagia. 2005;20:157–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nankivell P, Pothier D. Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122:1024–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frosh A, Jayaraj S, Porter G, Almeyda J. Is local anaesthesia actually beneficial in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23:259–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pothier D, Raghava N, Monteiro P, Awad Z. A randomized controlled trial: is water better than a standard lubricant in nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2006;31:134–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rudnick E, Sie K. Velopharyngeal insufficiency: current concepts in diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16:530–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howell R, Davolos A, Clary M, Frake P, Joshi A, Chaboki H. Miller fisher syndrome presents as an acute voice change to hypernasal speech. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:978–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stübgen J. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a radiologic and manometric study of the pharynx and esophagus. Dysphagia. 2008;23:341–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warnecke T, Teismann I, Zimmermann J, Oelenberg S, Ringelstein E, Dziewas R. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with simultaneous tensilon application. J Neurol. 2008;255:224–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsuneo Y, Minoru S, Yoshihiro K, Takashi N, Ryuichi H, Satoshi E, et al. Functional outcomes and reevaluation of esophageal speech after free jejunal transfer in two hundred thirty-six cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franklin K, Anttila H, Axelsson S, et al. Effects and side-effects of surgery for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review. Sleep. 2009;32:27–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golding-Kushner K, Argamaso R, Cotton R, et al. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J. 1990;27:337–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sie K, Starr J, Bloom D, Cunningham M, de Serres L, Drake A, et al. Multicenter interrater and intrarater reliability in the endoscopic evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:757–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muntz H. Navigation of the nose with flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:507–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiss G, Postma N. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1386–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perlman A, Van Daele D. Simultaneous videoendoscopic and ultrasound measures of swallowing. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1993;1:223–32.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Postma G, McGuirt W, Butler S, Rees C, Crandall H, Tansavatdi K. Laryngopharyngeal abnormalities in hospitalized patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1720–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Colton House J, Noordzij J, Burgia B, Langmore S. Laryngeal injury from prolonged intubation; a prospective analysis of contributing factors. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121:596–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leder S, Suiter D. Effect of nasogastric tubes on incidence of aspiration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:648–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dziewas R, Warnecke T, Hamacher C, Oelenberg S, Teismann I, Kraemer C, et al. Do nasogastric tubes worsen dysphagia in patients with acute stroke? BMC. Neurology. 2008;8:29. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murray J, Langmore SE, Ginsberg S, Dostie A. The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration. Dysphagia. 1996;11:99–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Donzelli J, Brady S, Wesling M, Craney M. Predictive value of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions for aspiration during video nasal endoscopic evaluation of the swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112:469–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Link D, Willging J, Miller C, Cotton R, Rudolph C. Pediatric laryngoscopic sensory testing during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: feasible and correlative. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:899–905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ota K, Saitoh E, Baba M, Sonoda S. The secretion severity rating scale: a potentially useful tool for management of acute-phase fasting stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.11.015,
  29. 29.
    Lear C, Flanagan J, Moorrees C. The frequency of deflutition in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1965;10:83–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perie S, Laccourreye O, Bou-Malhab F, Brasnu D. Aspiration in unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 1998;19:18–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhattacharyya N, Kotz T, Shapiro J. Dysphagia and aspiration with unilateral vocal cord immobility: incidence, characterization, and response to surgical treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:672–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nayak V, Bhattacharyya N, Kotz J, Shapiro J. Patterns of swallowing failure following medialization in unilateral vocal fold immobility. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1840–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Amin M, Belafsky P. Cough and swallowing dysfunction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43:35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bastian R. The videoendoscopic swallowing study: an alternative and partner to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia. 1993;8:359–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leonard R, Belafsky P, Rees C. Relationship between fluoroscopic and manometric measures of pharyngeal constriction: the pharyngeal constriction ratio. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:897–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fuller S, Leonard R, Aminpour S, Belafsky P. Validation of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:391–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Daniels S, Schroeder M, DeGeorge P, Corey D, Rosebek J. Effect of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16:140–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin-Harris B, Brodsky M, Michel Y, Lee F, Walters B. Delayed initiation of the pharyngeal swallow: normal variability in adult swallows. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:585–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stephen J, Taves D, Martin R. Bolus location at the initiation of the pharyngeal stage of swallowing in healthy older adults. Dysphagia. 2005;20:266–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu H, Hsiao Y, Chen C, Chang C, Lee Y. Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:396–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leder S, Sasaki C, Burrell M. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of dysphagia to identify silent aspiration. Dysphagia. 1998;13:19–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Leder S, Karas D. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in the pediatric population. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1132–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kelly A, Drinnan M, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gerek M, Atala A, Cekin F, Ciyiltepe M, Ozkaptan Y. The effectiveness of fiberoptic endoscopic swallow study and modified barium swallow study techniques in diagnosis of dysphagia. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2005;15:103–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tohara H, Nakane A, Murata S, Mikushi S, Ouchi Y, Wakasugi Y, et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability in fibroptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:884–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rosenbek J, Robbins J, Roecker E, Coyle J, Wood J. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Molfenter S, Steele C. Physiological variability in the deglutition literature: hyoid and laryngeal kinematics. Dysphagia. 2010;26:67–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Daele D, Perlman A, Cassell M. Intrinsic fibre architecture and attachments of the human epiglottis and their contributions to the mechanism of deglutition. J Anat. 1995;186:1–15.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Veis S, Logemann J, Colangelo L. Effects of three techniques on maximum posterior movement of tongue base. Dysphagia. 2000;15:142–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dejaeger E, Pelemans W, Ponette E, Joosten E. Mechanisms involved in post deglutition retention in the elderly. Dysphagia. 1997;12:63–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pauloski B, Rademaker A, Lazarus C, Boeckxstaens G, Kahrilas P, Logemann J. Relationship between manometric and videofluoroscopic measures of swallow function in healthy adults and patients treated for head and neck cancer with various modalities. Dysphagia. 2009;24:196–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hey C, Pluschinski P, Stanschus S, Euler HA, Sader RA, Langmore S, et al. A documentation system to save time and ensure proper application of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES®). Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63:201–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyBoston University Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.VA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations