Assessment of Social-Emotional Competencies Related to Resilience

  • Jack A. Naglieri
  • Paul A. LeBuffe
  • Valerie B. Shapiro
Chapter

Abstract

In the past 50 years there has been a growing interest in promoting, sustaining, and restoring the well-being of young people by nurturing their positive attributes and assets. This strength-based approach is predicated on the belief that “everybody has knowledge, talents, capacities, skills, and resources that can be used as building blocks toward their aspirations, the solution of their problems, the meeting of their needs, and the boosting of the quality of their lives” (Saleebey, 2008). A strength-based orientation suggests that, even in the face of adversity, individuals can overcome the odds and achieve better-than-expected outcomes (Masten, 2001). Studies of children that have beaten the odds suggest that these children share a common characteristic—many of which can be nurtured in their natural environments (Werner & Smith, 1992). The Devereux Center for Resilient Children (DCRC) has transformed the findings from this body of research into resources that parents and professionals can use to promote these characteristics in children and youth. This chapter first describes some of the fields of research and practice that have guided the incorporation of a strength-based approach to children’s mental health into the DCRC resources. Next, this chapter focuses on the specific resources within the DCRC collection that were designed to help practitioners collect relevant, empirical information about a child’s strengths, and concludes by providing examples of how these assessment tools can be used to plan and monitor interventions that promote resilience in children.

References

  1. Abbott, R. D., O’Donnell, J., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R. F. (1998). Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 542–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2007). The learning compact redefined: A call to action. A report of the commission on the whole child. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  3. Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Theoretical models of human development 6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 894–941). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2008). Positive youth development in the United States: History, efficacy, and links to moral and character education. In L. Nucci & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 459–483). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, S., & Whitaker, T. (2002). Pippah pack: Promoting positive youth environments. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
  7. Committee for Children. (2011). Second step: Skills for social and academic success. Seattle, WA: Committee for Children.Google Scholar
  8. Devaney, E., O’Brien, M. U., Tavegia, M., & Resnik, H. (2005). Promoting children’s ethical development through social and emotional learning. New Directions for Youth Development, 108, 107–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool PATHS curriculum. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 67–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional learning.Google Scholar
  11. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. The American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. The American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (1999). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA) assessment, technical manual, and user’s guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  15. LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment—Clinical form. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  16. LeBuffe, P. A., Naglieri, J. A., & Shapiro, V. B. (2011). The Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA) assessment—Second step edition. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  17. LeBuffe, P. A., Shapiro, V. B., & Naglieri, J. A. (2009). The Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA) assessment, technical manual, and user’s guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  18. Mackrain, M., LeBuffe, P. A., & Powell, G. (2007). The Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Infants and Toddlers (DECA-I/T) assessment, technical manual, and user’s guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  19. Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic. The American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masten, A. S., Hubbard, J. J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A., Garmezy, N., & Ramirez, M. (1999). Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaptation from childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 143–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCurdy, B. L., Mannella, M., & Eldridge, N. (2003). Positive behavior support in urban schools: Can we prevent the escalation of antisocial behavior? Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naglieri, J. A., LeBuffe, P. A., & Shapiro, V. B. (2011). The Devereux Student Strengths Assessment—Mini (DESSA-Mini) assessment, technical manual, and user’s guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  23. National Clearinghouse on Families & Youth. (2007). Putting positive youth development into practice: A resource guide. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, & Family and Youth Services Bureau.Google Scholar
  24. Nickerson, A. B. (2007). The use and importance of strength-based assessment. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 2, 15–25.Google Scholar
  25. Saleebey, D. (2008). The strengths perspective: Putting possibility and hope to work in our practice. In K. M. Sowers & C. N. Dulmus (Series Ed.) & B. W. White (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Vol. 1. The profession of social work (pp. 123–142). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Sawka-Miller, K. D., & Miller, D. N. (2007). The third pillar: Linking positive psychology and school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 2, 26–38.Google Scholar
  27. Seligman, M. E. P., Berkowitz, M. W., Catalano, R. F., Damon, W., Eccles, J. S., Gilham, J. E., et al. (2005). The positive perspective on youth development. In D. L. Evans, E. B. Foa, R. E. Gur, H. Hendin, C. P. O’Brien, M. E. P. Seligman, & B. T. Walsh (Eds.), Treating and preventing adolescent mental health disorders: What we know and what we don’t know (pp. 498–527). New York: Oxford University Press, The Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, & The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  28. Shinn, M. R., Tindal, G. A., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werner, E. E. (1984). Resilient children. Young Children, 40, 68–72.Google Scholar
  30. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. (2004). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. In J. Zins, R. P. Weissberg, M. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What the research says. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack A. Naglieri
    • 1
  • Paul A. LeBuffe
    • 2
  • Valerie B. Shapiro
    • 3
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Devereux Center for Resilient ChildrenVillanovaUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations