Measurement System Analysis with R

  • Emilio L. Cano
  • Javier M. Moguerza
  • Andrés Redchuk
Part of the Use R! book series (USE R, volume 36)


Measurement system analysis (also known as gage R&R study) identifies and quantifies the sources of variation that influence the measurement system. R&R stands for repeatability and reproducibility. It is a very important matter in Six Sigma, because if the variability of the measurement system is not controlled, then the process cannot be improved. To perform a gage R&R study, several of the individual tools described in other chapters of the book may be used, such as control charts, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and plots. The principal types of studies are crossed studies and nested studies. This chapter shows how to use these tools individually with R and provides an interpretation of the outputs from the SixSigma package for crossed studies.


  1. 2.
    Allen, T. T. (2010). Introduction to engineering statistics and lean Six Sigma—Statistical quality control and design of experiments and systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Arthur, J. (2006). Lean six sigma demystified. Demystified series. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    Burdick, R., Borror, C., & Montgomery, D. (2005). Design and analysis of gauge R&R studies: Making decisions with confidence intervals in random and mixed ANOVA models. ASA-SIAM series on statistics and applied probability. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
  4. 42.
    ISO (1994). ISO 5725-1: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  5. 43.
    ISO (2009). ISO/TS 16949: Quality management systems—Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2008 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  6. 69.
    Montgomery, D. (2005). Introduction to statistical quality control (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 88.
    Roth, T. (2011). qualityTools: Statistics in quality science. R package version 1.50.Google Scholar
  8. 94.
    Searle, S., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. (2006). Variance components. Wiley series in probability and statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. 101.
    Vardeman, S. B., & VanValkenburg, E. S. (1999). Two-way random-effects analyses and gauge r&r studies. Technometrics, 41(3), 202–211.Google Scholar
  10. 110.
    Workgroup, M. (2010). MSA manual (4th ed.). Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilio L. Cano
    • 1
  • Javier M. Moguerza
    • 1
  • Andrés Redchuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Operations ResearchRey Juan Carlos UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations