Six Sigma in a Nutshell

  • Emilio L. Cano
  • Javier M. Moguerza
  • Andrés Redchuk
Chapter
Part of the Use R! book series (USE R, volume 36)

Abstract

Many total quality management methodologies have been introduced in recent decades. Six Sigma has emerged as a breakthrough methodology. With Six Sigma, we are solving problems and improving processes using as our basis one of the most powerful tools of human development: the scientific method. The basis of the Six Sigma methodology is the DMAIC cycle. It consists of five stages: define, measure, analyze, improve, and control. The roles of people involved in Six Sigma projects are also an important issue. Using martial arts comparisons, these roles can be categorized into Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts, Yellow Belts, Champions, and Managers. In this chapter, we give an overall view of Six Sigma and a basic description of the interaction between the different elements involved in this methodology.

References

  1. 4.
    Bentley, W., & Davis, P. (2009). Lean Six Sigma secrets for the CIO: ITIL, COBIT, and beyond. USA: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 9.
    Box G (1992). Teaching engineers experimental design with a paper helicopter. Quality Engineering, 4(3), 453–459.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 13.
    Burton, T. T., & Sams, J. L. (2005). Six Sigma for small and mid-sized organizations: Success through scaleable deployment. Boca Rotan: J. Ross Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. 36.
    Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (1999). Six sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. New York: Doubleday Business.Google Scholar
  5. 44.
    ISO (2011). Iso 13053-1:2011–Quantitative methods in process improvement—six sigma —part 1: DMAIC methodology. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  6. 65.
    Martin, J. (2007). Operational excellence: Using lean six sigma to translate customer value through global supply chains. Series on resource management. PA: Auerbach Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 76.
    Pande, P., Neuman, R., & Cavanagh, R. (2000). The Six Sigma way: How GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. 79.
    Poincaré, H. (1914). Science and method. London: Nelson. Originally published in French as Science et Méthode in 1908.Google Scholar
  9. 80.
    Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. Originally published in German as Logik der Forschung in 1934.Google Scholar
  10. 81.
    Prieto, M. (2005). 6 sigma Qué es y cómo aplicarlo a la empresa española. Asociacion Española para la Calidad.Google Scholar
  11. 82.
    Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2009). The Six Sigma handbook: A complete guide for green belts, black belts, and managers at all levels. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. 97.
    Snee, R. D. (2004). Six-sigma: The evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 107.
    Wilson, G. (2005). Six sigma and the product development cycle. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilio L. Cano
    • 1
  • Javier M. Moguerza
    • 1
  • Andrés Redchuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Operations ResearchRey Juan Carlos UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations