Advances in Yersinia Research pp 247-252
YopM and Plague
YopM is required for full virulence of Yersinia pestis in systemic and bubonic plague, where it functions to counteract innate defenses. Our lab has been using the systemic plague model to identify the immunologic steps at which YopM has its earliest effects and then to work back to the associated signaling pathways affected by YopM. We have found that Gr1+ cells (polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), monocytes, and some dendritic cells (DCs)) are required to limit the growth of YopM−Y. pestis. Further, when mice lack the chemokine receptor CCR2, YopM−Y. pestis grows as well as the parent strain in both systemic and bubonic plague, indicating that YopM’s molecular targets ultimately act through CCR2. YopM disables the recruitment of CCR2+ Gr1+ inflammatory DCs into spleen, whereas in liver, it is the function of CCR2+ Gr1+ PMNs that is undermined. Microarray analysis of transcriptional differences in CD11b+ cells from spleens of mice infected with parent vs. YopM−Y. pestis points to the downregulation of expression of the transcription factor Egr-1 and of a chemokine ligand for CCR2, CCL2, as effects of YopM initiated by 1 h after infection. These findings provide a link between YopM’s effects at the molecular and immunological levels.
- Evdokimov AG, Anderson DE, Routzahn KM et al (2000) Overproduction, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of YopM, an essential virulence factor extruded by the plague bacterium Yersinia pestis. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 56:1676–1679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maekawa T, Takahashi N, Honda T et al (2010) Porphyromonas gingivalis antigens and interleukin-6 stimulate the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 via the upregulation of early growth response-1 transcription in human coronary artery endothelial cells. J Vasc Res 47:346–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McMahon SB, Monroe JG (1996) The role of early growth response gene 1 (egr-1) in regulation of the immune response. J Leuk Biol 60:159–166Google Scholar