Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy V pp 209-218 | Cite as
Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Type Ia Supernova Inference
Abstract
Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) are the most precise cosmological distance indicators and are important for measuring the acceleration of the Universe and the properties of dark energy. Current cosmological analyses use rest-frame optical SN Ia light curves to estimate distances, whose accuracy is limited by the confounding effects of host galaxy dust extinction. The combination of broadband optical and near-infrared (NIR) light curves and spectroscopic data has the potential to improve inference in supernova cosmology. I describe a principled, hierarchical Bayesian framework to coherently model the multiple random and uncertain effects underlying the observed data, including measurement error, intrinsic supernova covariances, host galaxy dust extinction and reddening, peculiar velocities and distances. Using a new MCMC code, BayeSN, to compute probabilistic inferences for individual SN Ia and the population, I applied these hierarchical models to the joint analysis of the optical, near-infrared (NIR), and spectroscopic data from a large sample of nearby SN Ia. The combination of optical and NIR data better constrains estimates of the dust effects and approximately doubles the precision of cross-validated SN Ia distance predictions compared to using optical data alone. The hierarchical model is extended to include spectroscopic data to estimate significant correlations between the intrinsic optical colors and ejecta velocities. These applications demonstrate the power and flexibility of multi-level modeling in the analysis of SN Ia data.
Keywords
Dark Energy Light Curve Light Curf Dust Effect Host GalaxyNotes
Acknowledgements
Supernova research at Harvard College Observatory is supported in part by NSF grant AST-0907903. KM thanks R.P. Kirshner and the CfA Supernova Group for continued collaborations.
References
- 1.Amanullah, R., et al. 2010, Astrophys. J., 716, 712Google Scholar
- 2.Astier, P., et al. 2006, Astron. Astrophys., 447, 31Google Scholar
- 3.Blondin, S., Mandel, K. S., & Kirshner, R. P. 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 526, A81+Google Scholar
- 4.Conley, A., Carlberg, R. G., Guy, J., Howell, D. A., Jha, S., Riess, A. G., & Sullivan, M. 2007, Astrophys. J., 664, L13Google Scholar
- 5.Contreras, C., et al. 2010, Astron. J., 139, 519Google Scholar
- 6.Elias, J. H., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Persson, S. E. 1985, Astrophys. J., 296, 379Google Scholar
- 7.Finkelman, I., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Finkelman, I., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Folatelli, G., et al. 2010, Astron. J., 139, 120Google Scholar
- 10.Foley, R. J. & Kasen, D. 2011, Astrophys. J., 729, 55Google Scholar
- 11.Freedman, W. L., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 704, 1036Google Scholar
- 12.Frieman, J. A., Turner, M. S., & Huterer, D. 2008, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophs., 46, 385Google Scholar
- 13.Ganeshalingam, M., et al. 2010, Astrophys. J. Suppl,, 190, 418Google Scholar
- 14.Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition (Boca Raton, Fla.: Chapman & Hall/CRC)Google Scholar
- 15.Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Goobar, A. 2008, Astrophys. J.,, 686, L103Google Scholar
- 17.Guy, J., et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys., 466, 11Google Scholar
- 18.Guy, J., Astier, P., Nobili, S., Regnault, N., & Pain, R. 2005, Astron. Astrophys., 443, 781Google Scholar
- 19.Hamuy, M., et al. 1996, Astron. J., 112, 2408Google Scholar
- 20.Hicken, M., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 700, 331Google Scholar
- 21.Hicken, M., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 700, 1097Google Scholar
- 22.Howell, D. A. 2010, ArXiv e-prints 1011.0441Google Scholar
- 23.Jha, S., et al. 2006, Astron. J., 131, 527Google Scholar
- 24.Jha, S., Riess, A. G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2007, Astrophys. J., 659, 122Google Scholar
- 25.Kelly, P. L., Hicken, M., Burke, D. L., Mandel, K. S., & Kirshner, R. P. 2010, Astrophys. J., 715, 743Google Scholar
- 26.Kessler, R., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J. Suppl,, 185, 32Google Scholar
- 27.Kirshner, R. P. 2010, in Dark Energy: Observational and Theoretical Approaches, ed. P. Ruiz-Lapuente (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 151Google Scholar
- 28.Kowalski, M., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 686, 749Google Scholar
- 29.Krisciunas, K., et al. 2007, Astron. J., 133, 58Google Scholar
- 30.Krisciunas, K., Phillips, M. M., & Suntzeff, N. B. 2004, Astrophys. J.,, 602, L81Google Scholar
- 31.Krisciunas, K., et al. 2004, Astron. J., 128, 3034Google Scholar
- 32.Loredo, T. J. & Hendry, M. A. 2010, in Bayesian Methods in Cosmology, ed. M. Hobson et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 245Google Scholar
- 33.Mandel, K. S. 2011, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 34.Mandel, K. S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2011, Astrophys. J., 731, 120Google Scholar
- 35.Mandel, K. S., Wood-Vasey, W. M., Friedman, A. S., & Kirshner, R. P. 2009, Astrophys. J., 704, 629Google Scholar
- 36.Meikle, W. P. S. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Perlmutter, S., et al. 1999, Astrophys. J., 517, 565Google Scholar
- 38.Riess, A. G., et al. 1998, Astron. J., 116, 1009Google Scholar
- 39.Riess, A. G., et al. 1999, Astron. J., 117, 707Google Scholar
- 40.Riess, A. G., et al. 2011, Astrophys. J., 730, 119Google Scholar
- 41.Riess, A. G., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 699, 539Google Scholar
- 42.Riess, A. G., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J. Suppl,, 183, 109Google Scholar
- 43.Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., & Kirshner, R. P. 1996, Astrophys. J., 473, 88Google Scholar
- 44.Wood-Vasey, W. M., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 689, 377Google Scholar
- 45.Wood-Vasey, W. M., et al. 2007, Astrophys. J., 666, 694Google Scholar