The Use of Bioinformatics in Care Map Analysis

Chapter
Part of the Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age book series (Healthcare Delivery Inform. Age)

Abstract

The need to expeditiously and quantitatively compare and contrast clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) led to the research and development of computational methods to analyze sepsis care maps, the graphical representations of CPGs. Current-day care maps have two drawbacks that do not allow computational comparison: (1) they exist as static graphical documents containing non-standardized vocabulary, and (2) there is no quantifiable means of examining and comparing CPGs. Both of these challenges can be addressed and possibly overcome through the use of bioinformatics paradigms and algorithms normally reserved for biological pathway analysis. A software system that embeds the static care maps was developed. It contained an underlying data model and offered one potential method of computationally comparing and contrasting these newly modified care maps.

References

  1. Advani, A., Lo, K., & Shahar, Y. (1998). Intention-based critiquing of guideline-oriented medical care. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association, USA, 483–487. Retrieved from http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9929266
  2. Bates, D. W., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, J., & Mullins, H. C. (2003). A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(1), 1–10. ISSN 1067–5027. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1097
  3. Bell, D., Layton, A. J., & Gabbay, J. (1991). Use of a guideline based questionnaire to audit hospital care of acute asthma. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 302(6790), 1440–1443. ISSN 0959–8138. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2070112
  4. Bernstam, E., Ash, N., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Boxwala, A. A., Mork, P., Shortliffe, E. H., & Greenes, R. A. (2000). Guideline classification to assist modeling, authoring, implementation and retrieval. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association, USA, 66–70. ISSN 1531-605X. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11079846
  5. Boxwala, A. A., Tu, S., Peleg, M., Zeng, Q., Ogunyemi, O., Greenes, R. A., Shortliffe, E. H., & Patel, V. L. (2001). Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 34(3), 157–169. ISSN 1532–0464. doi: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jbin.2001.1019 Google Scholar
  6. Cole, L., Lasker-Hertz, S., Grady, G., Clark, M., & Houston, S. (1996). Structured care methodologies: Tools for standardization and outcomes measurement. Nursing Case Management: Managing the Process of Patient Care, 1(4), 160–172. ISSN 1084–3647. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9205309
  7. de Lusignan, S., Stephens, P. N., Adal, N., & Majeed, A. (2002). Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 9, 395–401. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1023
  8. Deckard, A., Bergmann, F. T., & Sauro, H. M. (2006). Supporting the SBML layout extension. Bioinformatics, 22(23), 2966–2967. ISSN 1367–4803. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl520
  9. Gaddis, G. M., Greenwald, P., & Huckson, S. (2007). Toward improved implementation of evidence-based clinical algorithms: Clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision rules, and clinical pathways. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(11), 1015–1022. ISSN 1553–2712. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.010
  10. Gaddis, G., Woods, T., & Patel, S. (2008). Efficacy impacts of an evidence-based algorithmic approach to the treatment, matched to presumed underlying cause of nausea and vomiting, in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 52(4), S78. ISSN 01960644. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.031
  11. James, P. A., Cowan, T. M., Graham, R. P., Majeroni, B. A., Fox, C. H., & Jaén, C. R. (1997). Using a clinical practice guideline to measure physician practice: Translating a guideline for the management of heart failure. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice/American Board of Family Practice, 10(3), 206–212. ISSN 0893–8652. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9159659
  12. McDonald, C. J. (1997). The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4, 213–221, May 1997. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1997.0040213
  13. O’Neill, E. (2000). Utility of structured care approaches in education and clinical practice. Nursing Outlook, 48(3), 132–135. ISSN 00296554. doi: 10.1067/mno.2000.101982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mno.2000.101982
  14. Picard, K. M., O’Donoghue, S., Young-Kershaw, D. A. & Russell, K. J. (2006). Development and implementation of a multidisciplinary sepsis protocol. Critical Care Nurse, 26(3), 43–54. http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/43
  15. Ramraj, V. (2010). Computational analysis of clinical practice guidelines: Development of a software suite and document standard for storage and analysis of care maps. Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/28760
  16. Singh, R., Xu, J., & Berger, B. (2008). Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(35), 12763–12768. ISSN 1091–6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806627105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806627105
  17. Strömbäck, L. (2006). A method for comparison of standardized information within systems biology. In WSC’06: Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation, 1603–1610. Winter Simulation Conference, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0501-7. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1218112.1218403
  18. Strömbäck, L., & Lambrix, P. (2005). Representations of molecular pathways: An evaluation of SBML, PSI MI and BioPAX. Bioinformatics, 21(24), 4401–4407. ISSN 1367–4803. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti718
  19. Wang, S. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. The American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397–403. ISSN 00029343. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.eHealth Strategy OfficeUniversity of British Columbia VancouverVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations