Feedback Models for Learning, Teaching and Performance

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the role of feedback in learning with particular emphasis on its effect on learner performance, motivation and self-regulation. The authors provide a critical account of definitions and models of feedback, tease out the conceptual roots of practice guidelines and highlight how individual, relational and environmental factors can impact on the utility of feedback as a performance changing device. Many of the conceptual models published in the literature draw on theoretical principles rather than empirical data to support the impact of feedback on learning/performance change. The empirical data from a diverse range of disciplines converge to a common finding—that written and verbal feedback in practice deviates considerably from principles of effective practice. The reasons for this theory–practice disjunction are explored, and the authors suggest that the lack of adoption of advocated principles may represent a need to look at feedback in a different way.

A constructivist view on feedback encourages learners and educators to view feedback as a system of learning, rather than discreet episodes of educators “telling” learners about their performance. Highlighting the need for a shift in conceptual framework is not enough however. What is limited in the feedback literature is how to achieve feedback encounters that are typified by learner engagement. We argue that contesting the traditional, behaviourist “feedback ritual” requires leadership from educators, and a deliberate commitment to curricular redesign with purposeful and structured opportunities for learners to engage in feedback episodes, to put into place changes triggered by feedback and finally to re-evaluate performance in relation to set goals. Such a “system-orientated” take on feedback design requires upskilling of both educators and learners and needs to factor in the influence of context, culture and relationships in learning.

Keywords

Feedback Self-regulation Learner agency Behaviourist principles of learning Constructivist principles of learning 

References

  1. Asghar, A. (2009). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  4. *Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 210–216.Google Scholar
  7. *Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.Google Scholar
  8. *Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clariana, R., Wagner, B., & Roher Murphy, L. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ende, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ende, J., Pomerantz, A., & Erickson, F. (1995). Preceptors’ strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: A qualitative analysis. Academic Medicine, 70, 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falchikov, N. (2002). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge and Palmer.Google Scholar
  15. Fantuzzo, J., & Riggio, R. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernando, N., Cleland, J., McKenzie, H., Cassar, K., Fernando, N., Cleland, J., et al. (2008). Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments. Medical Education, 42(1), 89–95.Google Scholar
  17. Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills intervention on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Research in Education, 66, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, P., Ferguson-Smith, A., & Johnson, M. (2005). Developing essential professional skills: A framework for teaching and learning about feedback. BMC Medical Education, 5, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgs, J., Richardson, B., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (Eds.). (2004). Developing practice knowledge for health professionals. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2011). The National Student Survey: Finding and Trends. 2006–2010. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  23. Hounsell, D. (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 101–13). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ilgen, D., & Davis, C. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. *Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.Google Scholar
  26. Kluger, A., & Nir, D. (2009). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kluger, A., & Van Dijk, D. (2010). Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Medical Education, 44, 1166–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krause, K., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Retrieved August 5, 2009, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/FYEReport05KLK.pdf
  29. Kulhavy, R., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kulhavy, R., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. *Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
  32. Ladyshewsky, R. (2010). Building competency in the novice allied health professional through peer coaching. Journal of Allied Health, 39(2), 77–82.Google Scholar
  33. Latting, J. (1992). Giving corrective feedback: A decisional analysis. Social Work, 37, 424–430.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacDonald, R. (1991). Developmental students’ processing of teacher feedback in composition instruction. Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8(5), n5.Google Scholar
  36. Molloy, E. (2009). Time to pause: Feedback in clinical education, Chapter 8. In C. Delany & E. Molloy (Eds.), Clinical education in the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Molloy, E. (2010). The feedforward mechanism: A way forward in clinical learning? Medical Education, 44, 1157–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Molloy, E., & Clarke, D. (2005). The positioning of physiotherapy students and clinical supervisors in feedback sessions. Focus on Health Professional Education, 7, 79–90.Google Scholar
  39. Mory, E. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 745–783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In M. Spector, M. Spector, D. David Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, M. Driscoll, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.Google Scholar
  43. O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2008). Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Phye, G., & Sanders, C. (1994). Advice and feedback: Elements of practice for problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVII). New York, NY: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. *Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.Google Scholar
  48. Pritchard, R., Jones, S., Roth, P., Stuebing, K., & Ekeberg, S. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riordan, T., & Loacker, G. (2009). Collaborative and systemic assessment of student learning: From principles to practice. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 175–192). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sadler, D. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sadler, D. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinclair, H. K., & Cleland, J. A. (2007). Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback? Medical Education, 41, 580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. *Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.Google Scholar
  58. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  59. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Professions Education and Educational Research UnitMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of TechnologyBroadway SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations