Tracking the Evolution of Modal Properties of a Solid Propellant Launcher During Static Firing Test

Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

During actual operating conditions, mechanical systems, such as aerospace structures, may exhibit variations in their dynamic properties. Those variations need to be carefully tracked and identified to avoid interaction with excitation sources, leading to unstable behavior or even structural failures. In this paper, signals acquired during a static firing test on a Solid Rocket Motor will be analyzed and processed using Operational modal Analysis. To analyze the evolution of natural frequencies and modal damping as the propellant is burnt, time-histories are cut into shorter segments, which are then analyzed separately. Operational PolyMAX method is applied to identify structural properties of the system and correlation techniques are implemented to track the evolution of the modes. Finally, comparison and correlation with a numerical Finite Element model is also performed to evaluate the analysis.

Keywords

Solid rocket Operational modal analysis PolyMAX Time-varying system 

References

  1. 1.
    Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P (1997) Modal analysis theory and testing. Department Werktuigkunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing: theory, practice and applications. Research Studies, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marchesiello S, Bedaoui S, Garibaldi L, Argoul P (2009) Time-dependant identification of bridge-like structures with crossing loads. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(6):2019–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peeters B, Dammekens F, Magalhães F, Van der Auweraer H, Caetano E, Cunha A (2006) Multi-run operational modal analysis of the guadiana cable-stayed bridge. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXIV, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peeters B, Van der Auweraer H, Vanhollebeke F, Guillaume P (2007) Operational modal analysis for estimating the dynamic properties of a stadium structure during a football game. Shock Vib 14(4):283–303Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oliver-Escandell M-A, Leroy S, Peeters B, Roubertier J, Cordeau A, Laslots J (2009) In-flight testing of a very large aircraft: a discussion on excitation and data analysis techniques. In: Proceedings of IFASD 2009, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    James GH, Cao TT, Fogt VA, Wilson RL, Bartkowicz TJ (2011) Extraction of modal parameters from spacecraft flight data. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXIX, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hermans L, Van der Auweraer H, Benveniste A, Goursat M, Haerens D, Mourey P (1998) Estimation of in-flight structural dynamics models of a spacecraft launcher. In: Proceedings of ISMA23, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fransen S, Rixen D, Henriksen T, Bonnet M (2010) On the operational modal analysis of solid rocket motors. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXVIII, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goursat M, Döhler M, Mevel L, Andersen P (2010) Crystal clear SSI for operational modal analysis of aerospace vehicles. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXVIII, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engelhart CW, Hunt DL, Chang CF, Mason D (1989) Evaluation of dynamic responses of the space shuttle rocket motor static firing. In: Proceedings of IMAC VII, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peeters B, Van der Auweraer H, Guillaume P, Leuridan J (2004) The PolyMAX frequency domain method: a new standard for modal parameter estimation? Shock Vib 11:395–409Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peeters B, Guillaume P, Van der Auweraer H, Cauberghe B, Verboven P, Leuridan J (2004) Automotive and aerospace applications of the PolyMAX modal parameters estimation method. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXII, DearbornGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, K.U. Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bendat JS, Piersol AJ (1993) Engineering applications of correlation and spectral analysis. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1975) Digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LMS InternationalLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations