Using Substructuring to Predict the Human Hand Influence on a Mechanical Structure
Substructuring methods have been widely used on mechanical structures to study and improve the dynamic behavior of complex assemblies by analyzing the behavior of each substructure separately. Substructuring methods can potentially be used to create a functional link between the dynamic behavior of the human body and mechanical structures in order to enhance the interactions between the body and these same structures. Keeping in mind that significant amounts of vibrations are transmitted to the body from contact with vibrating structures – human-structure coupling interactions could be used as a way to study components of comfort during vibration exposure, and even with the goal of preventing injuries caused by transmitted vibration.
This paper investigates a coupling between a straight beam and the hand-arm system which is a non-linear structure. Each structure is characterized by experimentally obtained mechanical mobility Frequency Response Function (FRF) data over a frequency range between [5, 300] Hz. The FRF Based Substructuring method (FBS) allows coupling through the interface set of substructures. This links mechanical structures with the human body where only interface measurements are gathered. The FBS method is used to predict the dynamic behavior of the assembly.
KeywordsDynamic Behavior Grip Force Frequency Response Function Mechanical Impedance Target Measurement
- 1.Hurty WC (1960) Vibrations of structural systems by component mode synthesis. J Eng Mech/Am Soc Civil Eng 86(4):51–69Google Scholar
- 4.Klosterman A (1971) On the experimental determination and use of modal representations of dynamic characteristics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, Department of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- 6.Jetmundsen B (1986) On frequency domain methodologies for prescribed structural modification and subsystem synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing: theory, practice and application, 2nd edn. Research Studies Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 9.Avitabile P (2003) Twenty years of structural dynamic modification: a review. J Sound Vib 37:14–25Google Scholar
- 10.De Klerk D, Rixen D, De Jong J (2006) Frequency based substructuring (FBS) method reformulated according to the dual domain decomposition method. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international modal analysis conference, society for experimental mechanics, Paper 136Google Scholar
- 12.Griffin MJ (1990) Handbook of human vibration. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mansfield NJ (2005) Human response to vibration. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 14.International Standard Organization, ISO 2631 (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock – evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. International Standard Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 18.Richard S, Champoux Y (2006) Development of a metric related to the dynamic comfort of a road bike. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference XXIV (IMAC XXIV), St. LouisGoogle Scholar
- 19.Richard S (2005) Etude du comportement dynamique d’un vélo de route en lien avec le confort du cycliste. M.ScA thesis, Université de SherbrookeGoogle Scholar
- 27.International Standard Organization, ISO/DIS 5349 (2001) Mechanical vibration – measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. International Standard Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar