Transmission of Guided Waves Across Prestressed Interfaces

  • Jacob C. Dodson
  • Janet Wolfson
  • Jason R. Foley
  • Daniel J. Inman
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Prestresses can be both applied and/or environmentally generated and change the dynamics of structures. The preload can change due environmental factors, such as temperature variations, and operational excitation including impulsive loading. This study uses a novel Hopkinson bar configuration, the Preload Interface Bar, and investigates the effect of prestress on the stress wave propagation across interfaces between the incident and transmission bars. The non-ideal interface with a partial gap is experimentally investigated and analyzed. The preloaded partial gap causes generation of flexural waves at the interface. The interface is modeled as a preload dependent elastic joint in which flexural and longitudinal waves can be transmitted and reflected. The analytical and experimental energy transfer and mode conversion from reflection and transmission will be examined in the spectral domain. The analysis shows that as the preload increases the interface becomes stiffer and converges to a near-perfect 1-D interface.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams D, Yoder N, Butner C, Bono R, Foley J, Wolfson J (2011) Transmissibility analysis for state awareness in high bandwidth structures under broadband loading conditions. Nonlinear modeling and applications, vol. 2. In: Proulx T (ed) Vol. 11 of Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, Springer, New York, pp 137–148Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chattopadhyay S (1993) Dynamic response of preloaded joints. J Sound Vib 163(3):527–534MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Offterdinger K, Waschkies E (2004) Temperature dependence of the ultrasonic transmission through electrical resistance heated imperfect metal-metal interfaces. NDT & E Int 37(5):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daehnke A, Rossmanith H.P (1997) Reflection and refraction of plane stress waves at interfaces modelling various rock joints. Fragblast: Int J Blasting Fragm 1(2):111–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barber J, Comninou M, Dundurs J (1982) Contact transmission of wave motion between two solids with an initial gap. Int J Solids Struct 18(9):775–781MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leung R, Pinnington R (1990) Wave propagation through right-angled joints with compliance-flexural incident wave. J Sound Vib 142(1):31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leung R, Pinnington R (1992) Wave propagation through right-angled joints with compliance: longitudinal incidence wave. J Sound Vib 153(2):223–237MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foley JR, Dodson JC, McKinion CM, Luk VK, Falbo GL (2010) Split Hopkinson bar experiments of preloaded interfaces. In: Proceedings of the IMPLAST 2010 conference, SEM, 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolsky H, (1963) Stress waves in solid. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doyle JF (1997) Wave propagation in structures : spectral analysis using fast discrete Fourier transforms, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inman DJ (2007) Engineering Vibration, Pearson, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulite Semiconductor Products, Kulite Strain Gage Manual, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob C. Dodson
    • 1
  • Janet Wolfson
    • 2
  • Jason R. Foley
    • 2
  • Daniel J. Inman
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Air Force Research Laboratory AFRL/RWMFEglin AFBUSA
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of Michigan Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations