Crowd-Induced Vibrations of a Steel Footbridge in Reykjavík
Abstract
Vibration serviceability of structures for human occupancy has become an important part of the design of slender civil engineering structures such as footbridges. In the past decades, a considerable amount of research has been carried out within the field and international codes of practice and state-of-the-art design guidelines been improved considerably. However, there are several important questions that remain unanswered. In particular the response of pedestrians to footbridge vibrations is severely under-researched. This is primarily due to lack of data from real-life footbridges subject to in-service traffic. In addition, the lack of a generally accepted way to quantify measured vibration response on footbridges makes it difficult to interpret data from already published experiments. In this paper, various methods to quantify human-response to vibrations are reviewed and put in relation to the results obtained from a controlled crowd test on a steel footbridge in Reykjavik, Iceland. A systematic quantification of the measured vibration response is carried out and the results are presented statistically through their probability distributions. Finally, testimonies from participants in a controlled perception tests are used in conjunction with measured responses, to obtain valuable information about human response to footbridge vibration. It is shown that there is only a small correlation between the subjective rating and the vibration felt by the pedestrians.
Keywords
Footbridges Human-induced vibration Full-scale testing Human-perceptionNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors kindly acknowledge Efla Consulting Engineers and the Icelandic Road Administration for their financial support and students from the University of Iceland for participating in the pedestrian tests.
References
- 1.Gudmundsson GV, Ingólfsson ET, Einarsson B, Bessason B (2008) Vibration serviceability of three lively footbridges in Reykjavik. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on footbridge 2008, Porto, 2–4 July 2008Google Scholar
- 2.Zivanovic S, Ingólfsson ET, Pavic A, Gudmundsson GV (2010) Experimental investigation of Reykjavik City Footbridge. In: Proceedings of the 28th IMAC conference, Florida, 1–4 Feb 2010Google Scholar
- 3.Griffin MJ (1996) Handbook of human vibration. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 4.BS 5440:1978 (1978) Steel, concrete and composite bridges, part 2: specifications for loads; appendix C: vibration serviceability requirements for foot and cycle track bridges. British Standards Institute, UKGoogle Scholar
- 5.UK NA to EN 1991-2:2003 (2003) UK national annex to Eurocode 1: actions of structures – part 2: traffic loads on bridges. British Standard Institute, UKGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sétra, Footbridges (2006) Assessment of vibrational behavior of footbridges under pedestrian loading. The Technical Department for Transport, Roads and Bridges Engineering and Road Safety, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 7.HIVOSS (2007) Design of footbridges – guidelines and background document, RFS2-CT-2007-00033Google Scholar
- 8.ISO 2631-2:1989 (1989) Mechanical vibration and shock – evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – part 2: vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz). International Organization for Standardization, GenèvaGoogle Scholar
- 9.ISO 10137:2007 (2007) Bases for design of structures – serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibration. International Organization for Standardization, GenèvaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kasperski M (2006) Vibration serviceability for pedestrian structures. In: Proceedings of the ICE: structures and buildings, vol 159(5), pp 273–282Google Scholar
- 11.Barker C (2007) Footbridge pedestrian vibration limits background to response calculations. Int J Space Struct 22(1):35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.BS 6472-1:2008 (2008) Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Part 1: vibration sources other than blasting. British Standard Institution, UKGoogle Scholar
- 13.Zivanovic S, Pavic A (2009) Probabilistic assessment of human response to footbridge vibration. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 28(4):255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.ISO 2631:1974 (1974) Guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration, 1st edn. International Organization for Standardization, GenévaGoogle Scholar
- 15.ISO 2631/1:1985 (1985) Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – part 1: general requirements. International Organization for Standardization, GenévaGoogle Scholar
- 16.Willford MR, Young P (2006) A design guide for footfall induced vibration of structures. The Concrete Centre, CCIP-016, CamberleyGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sólnes J (1997) Stochastic processes and random vibration, theory and practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ingólfsson ET, Georgakis CT, Svendsen MN (2008) Vertical footbridge vibrations: details regarding experimental validation of the Response Spectrum Methodology. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on footbridge 2008, Porto, 2–4 July 2008Google Scholar
- 19.Georgakis CT, Ingólfsson ET (2008) Vertical footbridge vibrations: the Response Spectrum Methodology. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on footbridge 2008, Porto, 2–4 July 2008Google Scholar
- 20.EN 1990:2002/A1:2005 (2005) Ammendment 1 to eurocode – basis of structural design. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar