Piscivorous Mammalian Wildlife as Sentinels of Methylmercury Exposure and Neurotoxicity in Humans

Chapter
Part of the Current Topics in Neurotoxicity book series (Current Topics Neurotoxicity, volume 2)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of how piscivorous (fish-eating) wildlife can be used to complement existing public health strategies to assess the neurotoxic risks of methylmercury. A brief introduction concerning the use of wildlife as model sentinel organisms in the field of environmental neurotoxicology is provided. Next, selected scientific examples are detailed that illustrate how data from piscivorous wildlife may provide pertinent, real-world information on the bioavailability of methylmercury and environmental exposures. Information concerning methylmercury’s subclinical (e.g., perturbations in brain neurochemistry and neuroendocrine hormones) and clinical (structural and functional deficits) neurological effects across organisms is also discussed.

References

  1. Aronson SM. The dancing cats of Minamata Bay. Med Health R I. 2005;88:209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aschner M, Yao CP, Allen JW, Tan KH. Methylmercury alters glutamate transport in astrocytes. Neurochem Int. 2000;37:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu N, Head J. Mammalian wildlife as complementary models in environmental neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010;32:114–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu N, Klenavic K, Gamberg M, O’Brien M, Evans RD, Scheuhammer AM, Chan HM. Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptor binding characteristics in wild mink. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005a;24(6):1444–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Grochowina NM, Klenavic K, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Chan HM. Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptors in wild river otters (Lontra canadensis). Environ Sci Technol. 2005b;39(10):3585–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu N, Stamler CJ, Loua KM, Chan HM. An inter-species comparison of mercury inhibition on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005c;205(1):71–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina N, Klenavic K, Evans RD, Chan HM. Methylmercury impairs components of the cholinergic system in captive mink (Mustela vison). Toxicol Sci. 2006a;91:202–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu N, Kwan M, Chan HM. Mercury but not organochlorines inhibit muscarinic cholinergic receptor binding in the cerebrum of ringed seals (Phoca hispida). J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006b;69:1133–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Bursian S, Rouvinen-Watt K, Elliott J, Chan HM. Mink as a sentinel in environmental health. Environ Res. 2007a;103:130–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina NM, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Chan HM. Decreased N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor levels are associated with mercury exposure in wild and captive mink. Neurotoxicology. 2007b;28(3):587–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Chan HM. Cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase activity in relation to mercury levels in the cerebral cortex of wild river otters. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007c;26:213–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Evans D, Grochowina NM, Chan HM. The effects of mercury on muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes (M1 and M2) in captive mink. Neurotoxicology. 2008;29:328–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Sonne C, Letcher RJ, Born EW, Dietz R. Is dietary mercury of neurotoxicological concern to polar bears (Ursus maritimus)? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009;28(1): 133–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Evans RD, Trudeau VL, Chan HM. In vitro and whole animal evidence that methylmercury disrupts GABAergic systems in discrete brain regions in captive mink. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;151(3):379–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beeby A. What do sentinels stand for? Environ Pollut. 2001;112:285–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berntssen MH, Aatland A, Handy RD. Chronic dietary mercury exposure causes oxidative stress, brain lesions, and altered behaviour in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr. Aquat Toxicol. 2003;65:55–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Björkman L, Lundekvam BF, Laegreid T, Bertelsen BI, Morild I, Lilleng P, Lind B, Palm B, Vahter M. Mercury in human brain, blood, muscle and toenails in relation to exposure: an autopsy study. Environ Health. 2007;6:30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borg K, Wanntrop H, Erne K, Hanko H. Alkyl mercury poisoning in terrestrial Swedish wildlife. Viltrevy. 1967;6:302–77.Google Scholar
  19. Burbacher TM, Rodier PM, Weiss B. Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in humans and animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990;12:191–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burgess NM, Evers DC, Kaplan JD. Mercury and other contaminants in common loons breeding in Atlantic Canada. Ecotoxicology. 2005;14:241–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cardellicchio N, Decataldo A, Di LA, Misino A. Accumulation and tissue distribution of mercury and selenium in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) from the Mediterranean Sea (southern Italy). Environ Pollut. 2002;116:265–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chakrabarti SK, Loua KM, Bai C, Durham H, Panisset JC. Modulation of monoamine oxidase activity in different brain regions and platelets following exposure of rats to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1998;20:161–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36:609–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coccini T, Randine G, Candura SM, Nappi RE, Prockop LD, Manzo L. Low-level exposure to methylmercury modifies muscarinic cholinergic receptor binding characteristics in rat brain and lymphocytes: physiologic implications and new opportunities in biologic monitoring. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:29–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Colborn T, vom Saal FS, Soto AM. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101:378–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cumbie PM. Mercury levels in Georgia otter mink and freshwater fish. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1975;14:193–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dietz R, Riget FF, Boertmann D, Sonne C, Olsen MT, Fjeldsa J, Falk K, Kirkegaard M, Egevang C, Asmund G, Wille F, Moller S. Time trends of mercury in feathers of West Greenland birds of prey during 1851–2003. Environ Sci Technol. 2006a;40:5911–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dietz R, Riget F, Born EW, Sonne C, Grandjean P, Kirkegaard M, Olsen MT, Asmund G, Renzoni A, Baagøe H, Andreasen C. Trends in mercury in hair of Greenlandic polar bears (Ursus maritimus) during 1892–2001. Environ Sci Technol. 2006b;40(4):1120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dietz R, Born EW, Riget F, Sonne C, Aubail A, Drimmie R, Basu N. Temporal trends and future predictions of mercury concentrations in northwest Greenland polar bear (Ursus maritimus) hair. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(4):1458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Egeland GM, Ponce R, Bloom NS, Knecht R, Loring S, Middaugh JP. Hair methylmercury levels of mummies of the Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Environ Res. 2009;109(3):281–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eto K. Pathology of Minamata disease. Toxicol Pathol. 1997;25:614–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evers DC, Kaplan JD, Meyer MW, Reaman PS, Braselton WE, Major A, Burgess N, Scheuhammer AM. Geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feathers and blood. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1998;17:173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Evers DC, Han Y-J, Driscoll CT, Kamman NC, Goodale MW, Lambert KL, Holsen TM, Chen CY, Clair TA, Butler T. Biological mercury hotspots in the Northeastern United State and Southeastern Canada. Bioscience. 2007;58(1):29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Facemire CF, Gross TS, Guillette Jr LJ. Reproductive impairment in the Florida panthers: nature or nurture? Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103 Suppl 4:79–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Faro LR, Duran R, Do Nascimento JL, Perez-Vences D, Alfonso M. Effects of successive intrastriatal methylmercury administrations on dopaminergic system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003;55:173–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fimreite N, Reynolds LM. Mercury contamination of fish in northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manage. 1973;37:62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foley RE, Jackling SJ, Sloan RJ, Brown MK. Organochlorine and mercury residues in wild mink and otter: comparison with fish. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1988;7:363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fonfría E, Rodríguez-Farré E, Suñol C. Mercury interaction with the GABAA receptor modulates the benzodiazepine binding site in primary cultures of mouse cerebellar granule cells. Neuropharmacology. 2001;41:819–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fonfría E, Vilaro MT, Babot Z, Rodriguez-Farre E, Sunol C. Mercury compounds disrupt neuronal glutamate transport in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79: 545–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frederick PC, Hylton B, Heath JA, Spalding MG. A historical record of mercury contamination in southern Florida (USA) as inferred from avian feather tissue. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004;23:1474–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Golden NH, Rattner BA. Ranking terrestrial vertebrate species for utility in biomonitoring and vulnerability to environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;176:67–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Grandjean P, Budtz-Jørgensen E. Total imprecision of exposure biomarkers: implications for calculating exposure limits. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:712–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haines KJ, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Evans HE. Accumulation of mercury and selenium in the brain of river otters (Lontra canadensis) and wild mink (Mustela vison) from Nova Scotia, Canada. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408(3):537–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hamilton M, Basu N, Scheuhammer AM. Mercury, selenium and neurochemical biomarkers in different brain regions of migrating common loons from Lake Erie, Canada. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20(7):1677–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harada M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995;25:1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harada K, Koizumi A, Saito N, Inoue K, Yoshinaga T, Date C, Fujii S, Hachiya N, Hirosawa I, Koda S, Kusaka Y, Murata K, Omae K, Shimbo S, Takenaka K, Takeshita T, Todoriki H, Wada Y, Watanabe T, Ikeda M. Historical and geographical aspects of the increasing perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination in human serum in Japan. Chemosphere. 2007;66:293–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Head J, DeBofsky A, Hinshaw J, Basu N. Retrospective analysis of mercury content in feathers of birds collected From the State of Michigan (1895–2007). Ecotoxicology. 2011;20(7): 1636–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hebert CE, Weseloh DVC, Idrissi A, Arts MT, O’Gorman R, Gorman OT, Locke B, Madenjian CP, Roseman EF. Restoring piscivorous fish populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes causes seabird dietary change. Ecology. 2008;89:891–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kannan K, Corsolini S, Falandysz J, Oehme G, Focardi S, Giesy JP. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorinated hydrocarbons in marine mammals, fishes, and birds from coasts of the Baltic and the Mediterranean Seas. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:3210–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klenavic K, Champoux L, Mike O, Daoust PY, Evans RD, Evans HE. Mercury concentrations in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otters (Lontra canadensis) collected from eastern and Atlantic Canada: relationship to age and parasitism. Environ Pollut. 2008;156(2):359–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kucera E. Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can J Zool. 1983;61: 2250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Law RJ, Allchin CR, de Boer J, Covaci A, Herzke D, Lepom P, Morris S, Tronczynski J, de Wit CA. Levels and trends of brominated flame retardants in the European environment. Chemosphere. 2006;64:187–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. LeBlanc GA, Bain LJ. Chronic toxicity of environmental contaminants sentinels and biomarkers. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105 Suppl 1:65–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Jeffries RA. Adult women’s blood mercury concentrations vary regionally in the United States: association with patterns of fish consumption (NHANES 1999–2004). Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(1):47–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manzo L, Castoldi AF, Coccini T, Prockop LD. Assessing effects of neurotoxic pollutants by biochemical markers. Environ Res. 2001;85:31–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mcintyre JW, Barr JF. Common Loon. In: Birds of North America Online. 2010. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/313/articles/foodhabits. Accessed 12 Feb 2011.
  57. Meironyte D, Noren K, Bergman A. Analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in Swedish human milk. A time-related trend study, 1972–1997. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1999;58: 329–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1998;29:543–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nagashima K. A review of experimental methylmercury toxicity in rats: neuropathology and evidence for apoptosis. Toxicol Pathol. 1997;25:624–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. NRC. Animals as sentinels of environmental health hazards. Washington: Committee on Animal as Monitors of Environmental Hazards, National Academy Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  61. Ronald K, Tessaro SV, Uthe JF, Freeman HC, Frank R. Methylmercury poisoning in the harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus). Sci Total Environ. 1977;8:1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rutkiewicz J, Crump D, Scheuhammer AM, Jagla M, Basu N. Investigation of spatial trends and neurochemical impacts of mercury in herring gulls across the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ Pollut. 2010;158:2733–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sample BE, Suter GWIII. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 4. Piscivorous wildlife. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999;18:610–20.Google Scholar
  64. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW. Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio. 2007;36:12–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scheuhammer AM, Basu N, Burgess NM, Elliott JE, Campbell GD, Wayland M, Champoux L, Rodrigue J. Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:93–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scheuhammer AM, Bank M, Basu N, Evers DC, Heinz GH, Sandheinrich MB. Toxicology of mercury in fish and wildlife: recent advances. In: Bank M, editor. Mercury in the environment: pattern and process. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  67. Sepulveda MS, Poppenga RH, Arrecis JJ, Quinn LB. Concentrations of mercury and selenium in tissues of double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) from southern Florida. Col Waterbirds. 1998;21:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sleeman JM, Cristol DA, White AE, Evers DC, Gerhold RW, Keel MK. Mercury poisoning in a free-living northern river otter (Lontra canadensis). J Wildl Dis. 2010;46:1035–9.Google Scholar
  69. Stamler CJ, Abdelouahab N, Vanier C, Mergler D, Chan HM. Relationship between platelet monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) activity and mercury exposure in fish consumers from the Lake St. Pierre region of Que., Canada. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:429–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Strom S. Total mercury and methylmercury residues in river otters (Lutra canadensis) from Wisconsin. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;54:546–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Takeuchi T, Eto K. The pathology of Minamata disease—a tragic story of water pollution. Fukuoka, Japan: Kyushu University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson DR. Mercury in birds and terrestrial mammals. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW, editors. Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations. SETAC special publication series. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1996. pp. 341–56.Google Scholar
  73. Thompson DR, Furness RW, Walsh PM. Historical changes in mercury concentrations in the marine ecosystem of the north and north-east Atlantic-ocean as indicated by seabird feathers. J Appl Ecol. 1992;29:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schechter C. Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:590–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsuzuki Y. Effect of chronic methylmercury exposure on activities of neurotransmitter enzymes in rat cerebellum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1981;60:379–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. U.S. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.Google Scholar
  77. U.S. EPA. Mercury study report to congress, vol. VII: Characterization of human health and wildlife risks from mercury exposure in the United States. Washington: Office of Research and Development; 1997.Google Scholar
  78. U.S. EPA. EPA National Listing of Fish Advisories. Washington: Office of Water. 2009. EPA-823-F-09-007. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/fishadvisories/tech2008.cfm. Accessed 30 Jan 2011.
  79. U.S. NHANES. Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004.Google Scholar
  80. Wobeser G, Swift M. Mercury poisoning in a wild mink. J Wildl Dis. 1976;12:335–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wobeser G, Nielsen NO, Schiefer B. Mercury and mink. II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Can J Comp Med. 1976;40:34–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wren CD. Probable case of mercury poisoning in a wild otter, Lutra canadensis, in Northwestern Ontario. Can Field Naturalist. 1985;99:112–4.Google Scholar
  83. Wren CD, Stokes PM, Fischer KL. Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidification. Can J Zool. 1986;64:2854–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wren CD, Hunter DB, Leatherland JF, Stokes PM. The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink. I. Uptake and toxic responses. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1987;16:441–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yates D, Mayack D, Munney K, Evers DC, Taylor RJ, Kaur T, Major A. Mercury levels in mink and river otter in northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology. 2005;14:263–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zelikoff JT. Biomarkers of immunotoxicity in fish and other non-mammalian sentinel species: predictive value for mammals? Toxicology. 1998;129:63–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations