Advertisement

Historical Lines and an Overview of Current Research on Flow

  • Stefan Engeser
  • Anja Schiepe-Tiska
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the flow concept by listing the components of flow as provided by Csikszentmihalyi. We will show that these components constitute the widely shared definitional ground of researchers in the field, with only minor variation between research groups and time periods. Next, we try to clarify some lingering ambiguities regarding the components of flow, and then talk about flow as an optimal experience as well as discussing flow and happiness. Subsequently, we trace the history of flow. We take time to describe the beginnings of flow research by Csikszentmihalyi and a similar research program by Rheinberg in Germany. Following the description of flow and qualitative analyses, the quantitative method of the experience sampling method (ESM), which has greatly influenced research on flow, will be presented. Creativity and well-being remain an important part of flow research and will be considered here, but flow research has entered many other areas, spanning from a strong emphasis on sport, learning, and flow at work to the emerging research on flow in teams and social interaction or psychophysiological correlates of flow. Finally, we complete this chapter by exploring methodological aspects of the research on flow.

Keywords

Flow Experience Daily Experience Optimal Experience Experience Sampling Method Rewarding Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person-situation interactions. Journal of Personality, 77, 1615–1635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, J. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Two to tango: Automatic social coordination and the role of felt effort. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 335–371). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aellig, S. (2004). Über den Sinn des Unsinns: Flow-Erleben und Wohlbefinden als Anreize für autotelische Tätigkeiten : Eine Untersuchung mit der Experience Sampling Method (ESM) am Beispiel des Felsklettern [On the sense of nonsense. Flow experiences and well-being as incentives of autotelic activities]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  4. Andrew, M. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining ‘short’ and ‘core’ flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APA. (2011). American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/.
  6. Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker, A. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bühler, K. (1922). Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes [The mental development of the child]. Jena, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
  11. Callois, R. (1958). Les jeux et les hommes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  12. Cermakova, L., Moneta, G. B., & Spada, M. M. (2010). Dispositional flow as mediator of the relationship between attentional control and approaches to studying during academics examination preparation. Educational Psychology, 30, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow. The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Bennett, S. (1971). An exploratory model of play. American Anthropologist, 73, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988a). Introduction to part III. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 183–192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988b). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artist: An empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 91–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: A longitudinal study of their development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Interest and the quality of experience in classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 251–270.Google Scholar
  25. De Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullen, F. (2010). The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion, 10, 301–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2009). Sharing optimal experiences and promoting good community life in a multicultural society. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Drengner, J., Gaus, H., & Jahn, S. (2008). Does flow influence the brand image in event marketing? Journal of Advertising Research, 48, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, moderators of challenge-skill-balance and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Fullagar, C. J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). ‘Flow’ at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Getzel, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1966). The study of creativity in future artists: the criterion problem. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Experience, structure, and adaptability. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Graham, J. M. (2008). Self-expansion and flow in couples’ momentary experiences: An experience sampling study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 679–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Groos, K. (1899). Die Spiele des Menschen [Human games]. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  37. Harari, Y. N. (2008). Combat flow: military, political, and ethical dimensions of subjective well-being in war. Review of General Psychology, 12, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS. Psychogical Review, 62, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heckhausen, H., & Rheinberg, F. (1980). Lernmotivation im Unterricht, erneut betrachtet [Learning motivation in the classroom reconsidered]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 8, 7–47.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Experience Psychology, 18, 17–35.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, S. A., & Roberts, G. C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6, 156–171.Google Scholar
  43. Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu, S.-H., Liao, H.-L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  46. Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (1988). Flow and biocultural evolution. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 60–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moller, A. C., Meier, B. P., & Wall, R. D. (2010). Developing an experimental induction of flow: Effortless action in the lab. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 191–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Moneta, G. B. (2004a). The flow experience across cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 275–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Models of concentration in natural environments: A comparative approach based on streams of experiential data. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 603–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mugford, A. L. (2006). Flow in a team sport setting: Does cohesion matter? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66, 4536.Google Scholar
  53. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  54. Nielsen, K., & Cleal, B. (2010). Predicting flow at work: Investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 180–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reinhardt, C., Lau, A., Hottenrott, K., & Stoll, O. (2006). Flow-Erleben unter kontrollierter Beanspruchungssteuerung: Ergebnisse einer Laufbandstudie [Flow experiences under controlled running work load: Results of a laboratory treadmill study]. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 13, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rheinberg, F. (1982). Zweck und Tätigkeit [Goal and activity]. Habilitationsschrift, Fakultät für Psychologie. Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar
  59. Rheinberg, F. (1986). The motivational analysis of high-risk sport. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention and volition (pp. 249–259). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Rheinberg, F. (1989). Zweck und Tätigkeit. Motivationspsychologische Analysen zur Handlungsveranlassung. [Goal and activity. Motivational psychology analyses of action initiation]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  61. Rheinberg, F. (1993). Anreize engagiert betriebener Freizeitaktivitäten. Ein Systematisierungsversuch [Incentives of dedicated leisure activities: A suggestion for systematization]. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Psychologisches Institut der Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
  62. Rheinberg, F. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. In H. Heckhausen & J. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 323–348). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 510–548). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rheinberg, F., & Manig, Y. (2003). Was macht Spaß am Graffiti-Sprayen? Eine induktive Anreizanalyse [What motivates to draw graffiti? An inductive analysis of incentives]. Report Psychologie, 4, 222–234.Google Scholar
  65. Rheinberg, F., Manig, Y., Kliegl, R., Engeser, S., & Vollmeyer, R. (2007). Flow bei der Arbeit, doch Glück in der Freizeit. Zielausrichtung, Flow und Glücksgefühle [Flow during work but happiness during leisure time: Goals, flow-experience, and happiness]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 105–115.Google Scholar
  66. Rogatko, T. P. (2009). The influence of flow on positive affect in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schallberger, U., & Pfister, R. (2001). Flow-Erleben in Arbeit und Freizeit: Eine Untersuchung zum ‘Paradox der Arbeit’ mit der Experience Sampling Method (ESM) [Flow experiences in work and leisure: An experience sampling study about the paradox of work]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 45, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schüler, J., & Brunner, S. (2009). The rewarding effect of flow experience on performance in a marathon race. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 10, 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schüler, J., & Langens, T. A. (2007). Psychological crisis in the marathon race and the buffering effects of self-verbalization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2319–2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seifert, T., & Heddersen, C. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and flow in skateboarding: An ethnographic study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Solomon, P. (1961). Sensory deprivation: A symposium held at Harvard Medical School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sutton, R. C. (2005). Peak performance of groups: An examination of the phenomenon in musical groups. Dissertation International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65(10-A), 3908.Google Scholar
  76. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 21, 457–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2011). An experimental analysis of experiential and cognitive variables in web navigation. Human-Computer Interaction Google Scholar
  78. Wanner, B., Ladouceur, R., Auclair, A. V., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Flow and dissociation: Examination of mean levels, cross-links, and links to emotional well-being across sports and recreational and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 289–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Oxford: Markham.Google Scholar
  80. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, J. J., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2007). Further explorations into the conundrum of flow process. Journal of Occupational Science, 14, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. ZPID. (2011). Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation. http://www.zpid.de/.
  83. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of TrierTrierGermany
  2. 2.Center for International Student Assessment (ZIB), TUM School of EducationTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations