Advertisement

Collaborative Healthcare Innovation in Sweden

  • Andreas Larsson
  • Susanna Bill
  • Jenny Ingridsdotter
  • Annika Olsson
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

The medical technology (medtech) industry in Sweden is situated within a complex innovation ecosystem, in which various stakeholders from the public, private and academic sectors need to collaborate to meet demands on effective and efficient healthcare. Demographics are changing and those in need of healthcare are not only larger in numbers than ever but they are also more knowledgeable and demanding. Increasing innovative performance is crucial in both the private and public healthcare sectors, but bold steps forward need to be taken in light of stricter rules and regulations for how healthcare stakeholders should manage both their internal processes and the ways in which they interact with other stakeholders in the larger innovation system. The traditional way in which medtech companies gain access to user needs, primarily working through a sales–purchasing relationship with the public healthcare sector, is outdated and needs to be replaced with an increasingly collaborative and cocreative model of healthcare innovation.

This chapter describes experiences and lessons learned from InnoPlant, a 3-year (2008–2011) action learning project involving three companies from the Swedish medtech industry, two county/regional councils responsible for public healthcare, and four academic institutions—carried out within the framework of the Swedish Product Innovation Engineering program (PIEp). The purpose of the project was to advance the capability of stakeholders from the public, private, and academic sectors to collaborate in the cocreation of healthcare innovations.

Keywords

Learning Network Public Procurement Public Healthcare Innovation Capability Academic Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bergh P (2009) Learning among entrepreneurs in formal networks: Outcome, processes and beyond. Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  2. Bergh P, Thorgren S, Wincent J (2011) Entrepreneurs learning together: The importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 7, no. 1: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessant J, Kaplinsky R, Morris M (2003) Developing capability through learning networks. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 2, no. 1: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessant J, Tsekouras G (2001) Developing learning networks. AI & Society 15: 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bill S, van Helleputte J, Häglund F, Larsson A, Olsson A, Sjölund F (2011) Rethinking User Involvement in the Front End of Healthcare Innovation. Proceedings of the 18th International Product Development Management Conference (IPDMC’11), June 5–7, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Herzlinger RE (2006) Why Innovation in Health Care Is So Hard. Harvard Business Review 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  7. Karlsson, J, Booth S, Odenrick P (2007) Academics strategies and obstacles in achieving collaboration between universities and SMEs. Tertiary Education and Management 13, no. 3: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Olsson A, Wadell C, Odenrick P, Norell Bergendahl M (2010) An action learning method for increased innovation capability in organisations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7: 2, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rasmussen L (2004) Action research: Scandinavian experiences. AI & Society 18: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ritzén S. Zika-Viktorsson A, Forslin J, Engwall M (2005) Learning to change: A network approach to engineering management development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’05), August 15–18, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Swedish Competition Authority (2011) The Swedish Public Procurement Act – an introduction. Accessed 7 June 2011. http://www.kkv.se/upload/Filer/ENG/Publications/Public_procurement_intro.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Larsson
    • 1
  • Susanna Bill
    • 1
  • Jenny Ingridsdotter
    • 2
  • Annika Olsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Design SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Baltic and East European Graduate SchoolSödertörn UniversityHuddingeSweden

Personalised recommendations