Advertisement

Involving Customers in the Service Innovation Process

  • Marja Toivonen
  • Mari Holopainen
  • Tiina Tuominen
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

This chapter examines practices of involving customers in the service innovation process. Even though customer-centric views are increasingly gaining ground in the literature, there is not much research into the organisation of innovation processes in which customers actually participate. In this chapter we describe an action-research project where we, together with a case company, developed and tested several methods for customer participation. The company is a medium-sized Finnish insurance company which has developed several incremental service innovations during recent years. As the next step it wanted to adopt a systematic, genuinely customer-oriented innovation model.

Keywords

Innovation Process Innovation Model Customer Orientation Service Innovation Insurance Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramovici M, Bansel-Charensol L (2004) How to take customers into consideration in service innovation projects. Serv Ind J 24(1):56–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam I, Perry C (2002) A customer-oriented new service development process. J Serv Mark 16(6):515–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansoff I (1984) Implanting strategic management. Prentice Hall International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Morgan FN (2008) Service blueprinting. A practical technique for service innovation. Calif Manage Rev 50(3):66–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesbrough HW (2004) Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Manage 47(1):23–26Google Scholar
  6. Coghlan D, Brannick T (2005) Doing action research in your own organization. 2nd ed. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper RG, De Brentani U (1991) New industrial financial services. What distinguishes winners. J Prod Innov Manage 8(2):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. den Hertog P (2002) Co-producers of innovation: On the role of knowledge-intensive business services in innovation. In: Gadrey J, Gallouj F (eds) Productivity, innovation and knowledge in services: New economic and socio-economic approaches. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  9. Eden C, Huxham C (1996) Action research for management research. Br J Manage 7:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eerola A, Holst-Joergensen B (2002) Technology foresight in the Nordic countries: A report to Nordic Industrial Fund. Center for Innovation & Commercial Development Risoe Natl Lab, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes. Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin Sci Quart 40(1):84–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engvall M, Magnusson P, Marshall C, Olin, T, Sandberg, R (2001) Creative approaches to development. Exploring alternatives to sequential stage-gate models. http://www.fenix.chalmers.se
  13. Evered R, Louis MR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences. Inquiry from the inside and inquiry from the outside. Acad Manage Rev 6(3):385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallouj F, Weinstein O (1997) Innovation in services. Res Policy 26(4/5):537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godet M (1994) From anticipation to action. A handbook of strategic prospective. UNESCO Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoover WE, Eloranta E, Holmström J, Huttunen K (2001) Managing the demand-supply chain. Value innovations for customer satisfaction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Johansson AW, Lindhult E (2008) Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Res 6(1):95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim WC, Mauborgne R (1999) Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan Manage Rev 40(3):41–54Google Scholar
  19. Miles I (1999) Services in National Innovation Systems: From traditional services to knowledge intensive business services. In: Schienstock G, Kuusi O (eds) Transformation towards a learning economy. The Finnish National Fund for Research & Development—Sitra, Report no. 213, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  20. Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) The convergence of planning and execution. Improvisation in new product development. J Mark 62(3):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moreno JL, Borgatta EF (1951) An experiment with sociodrama and sociometry in industry. Sociometry 14(1):71–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) Co-creation experiences. The next practice in value creation. J Interacti Mark 18(3):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reason P, Bradbury H (2001) The handbook of action research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Shostack GL (1982) How to design a service. Eur J Mark 16(1):49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundbo J (2008) Customer-based innovation of knowledge e-services: The importance of after-innovation. Int J Serv Technol Manage 9(3–4):218–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sundbo J, Gallouj F (2000) Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services. In: Metcalfe JS, Miles I (eds) Innovation systems in the service economy. Measurement and case study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Toivonen M (2004) Foresight in services: Possibilities and special challenges. Serv Ind J 24(1):79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toivonen M (2010) Different types of innovation processes in services and their organisational implications. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F. (eds) The handbook of innovation and services. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  29. Torrance EP (1975) Sociodrama as a creative problem-solving approach to studying the future. J Creat Behav 9(3):182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuomi I (2002) Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the Internet. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Wikström S (1995) The customer as co-producer. Eur J Mark, 30(4):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yin RK (1994) Case study Research: Design and methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeithaml VA, Bolton RN, Deighton J, Keiningham TL, Lemon KN, Petersen JA (2006) Forward looking focus. Can firms have adaptive foresight? J Serv Res 9(2):168–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marja Toivonen
    • 1
  • Mari Holopainen
    • 2
  • Tiina Tuominen
    • 2
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandVTTFinland
  2. 2.BIT Research Centre, Aalto UniversityAaltoFinland

Personalised recommendations