Methodological Guidelines for Publishing Government Linked Data

  • Boris Villazón-TerrazasEmail author
  • Luis. M. Vilches-Blázquez
  • Oscar Corcho
  • Asunción Gómez-Pérez


Publishing Government Linked Data (and Linked Data in general) is a process that involves a high number of steps, design decisions and technologies. Although some initial guidelines have been already provided by Linked Data publishers, these are still far from covering all the steps that are necessary (from data source selection to publication) or giving enough details about all these steps, technologies, intermediate products, etc. In this chapter we propose a set of methodological guidelines for the activities involved within this process. These guidelines are the result of our experience in the production of Linked Data in several Governmental contexts. We validate these guidelines with the GeoLinkedData and AEMETLinkedData use cases.


Link Open Data Methodological Guideline Government Data Governmental Context Open Government Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barrasa, J., Corcho, O., and Gómez-Pérez, A. R2O, an Extensible and Semantically Based Database-to-Ontology Mapping Language. In Second Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (SWDB2004), 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizer, C., Cyganiak, R. and Heath, T. How to publish Linked Data on the Web. Web page, 2007. Revised 2008. Accessed 01/01/2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Volz, J., Bizer, C., Gaedke, M., Kobilarov, G.: Discovering and Maintaining Links on the Web of Data. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D. (eds.) The Semantic Web - ISWC 2009, pp. 731–746. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cyganiak, R., Maali, F. and Peristeras, V. Self-service linked government data with dcat and gridworks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS ’10, pages 37:1–37:3, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haase, P., Rudolph, S., Wang, Y., Brockmans, S., Palma, R., Euzenat, J. and d’Aquin, M. Networked Ontology Model. Technical report, NeOn project deliverable D1.1.1, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hausenblas, M., Halb,W., Raimond, Y., Feigenbaum, L. and Ayers, D. SCOVO: Using Statistics on the Web of Data. In ESWC, volume 5554 of LNCS, pages 708–722. Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heath, T. and Bizer, C. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space, volume 1. Morgan & Claypool, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hogan, A., Harth, A., Passant, A., Decker, S. and Polleres, A. Weaving the Pedantic Web. In Linked Data on the Web Workshop (LDOW2010) at WWW’2010, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimball, R. and Caserta, J. The Data Warehouse ETL Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Extracting, Cleanin. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maali, F. and Cyganiak, R. Re-using Cool URIs : Entity Reconciliation Against LOD Hubs. Library, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Vila-Suero, D., Villazón-Terrazas, B., Dunsire, G., Rodríguez, E.E. and Gómez-Pérezi, A. Style Guidelines for Naming and Labeling Ontologies in the Multilingual Web. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DCMI ’11. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C. and Auer, S. Limes - a time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nikolov, A. and dAquin, M. Identifying Relevant Sources for Data Linking using a Semantic Web Index. Search, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oren, E., Delbru, R. and Decker, S. Extending faceted navigation for RDF data. In ISWC, pages 559–572, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauermann, L., Cyganiak, R., Ayers, D. and Volkel, M. Cool URIs for the semantic web. Interest Group Note 20080331, W3C. Web page, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. E. E. E. Computer Society, Sponsored B. The, and Software Engineering Standards Committee. IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications IEEE Std 830–1998. Technical report, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sommer, G.G. The World of E-Government. Haworth Press, January 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse. PhD thesis, Facultad de Informática, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suarez-Figueroa, M.C, and Gómez-Pérez, A. NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: a Scenario-based Methodology. In (S3T 2009), 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, J. Project Scheduling and Cost Control: Planning, Monitoring and Controlling the Baseline, volume 1. J. Ross Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vilches-Blázquez, L.M., Gargantilla, J.A.R., López-Pellicer, F.J., Corcho, O., and Nogueras-Iso, J. An Approach to Comparing Different Ontologies in the Context of Hydrographical Information. In IF&GIS, pages 193–207, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Villazón-Terrazas, B., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. and Gómez-Pérez, A. A Pattern-Based Method for Re-Engineering Non-Ontological Resources into Ontologies. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 6(4):27–63, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W3C. Publishing Open Government Data. W3C Working Draft. Web page, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Villazón-Terrazas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis. M. Vilches-Blázquez
    • 1
  • Oscar Corcho
    • 1
  • Asunción Gómez-Pérez
    • 1
  1. 1.Ontology Engineering Group, Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial, Facultad de InformáticaUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridEspaña

Personalised recommendations