The Joy of Data - A Cookbook for Publishing Linked Government Data on the Web

Chapter

Abstract

Many governments have recently mandated the open publication of more information to the public, in attempts to facilitate the maintenance of open societies and in support of governmental accountability and transparency initiatives. Publication of structured data on the World Wide Web is in itself insufficient; in order to make use of such data, members of the public can best absorb data when it can be used with other published data. Linked Data approaches address key requirements of open government by providing a family of international standards and best practices for the publication, dissemination and reuse of structured data. Further, Linked Data, unlike previous data formatting and publication approaches, provides a simple mechanism for combining data from multiple sources across the Web. This chapter provides a six-step “cookbook” to model, create, publish and announce government Linked Data. We’ll highlight the role of the World Wide Web Consortium, an international standards organization and its member organizations who are currently driving specifications and best practices for the publication of governmental data. The chapter concludes with guidance on the social contract government agencies implicitly adopt when they publish Linked Data on the Web.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beckett, D. and Broekstra, J. (2008, January 15). SPARQL Query Results XML Format. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beckett, D. and Berners-Lee, T. (2011, March 28). Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language. W3C Team Submission. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergman, M. (2010, October 4). "Dealing with the Four Ps to Broaden Actual Use". Message posted to http://www.mkbergman.com/917/practical-p-p-p-problems-with-linked-data/Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergman, M. (2011, April 4). "Democratizing Information with Semantics". Retrieved 7 June, 2011 from http://www.mkbergman.com/953/democratizing-information-with-semantics/Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T. (2009, June 18). Linked Data Design Issues. Retrieved June 18, 2009 from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T. (2010, November 15). Keynote. First International Open Government Conference, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bizer, C., Cyganiak, R. and Heath, T. (2008, July 17). How to Publish Linked Data on the Web. Retrieved from http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heath, T. and Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space (1st edition). Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology, 1:1, 1–136. Morgan & Claypool, New York. Retrieved 7 June 2011 fromGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/#htoc11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cameron, D. (2010, May 31). Letter to Government departments on opening up data. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/statements-andarticles/2010/05/letter-to-government-departments-on-opening-up-data-51204Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DuCharme, R. (2011). Learning SPARQL: Querying and Updating with SPARQL 1.1, OReilly Media, Sebastapol, California.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duerst, M. and Suignard, M. (2005, January). Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs). RFC 3987, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), NetworkWorking Group. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txtGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forbus, K. and de Kleer, J. (1993). Building Problem Solvers. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frantzich, S. and Sullivan, J. (1996). The C-Span Revolution. University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geiselman, B. (2006). The States ask EPA to reconsider TRI changes. Waste & Recycling News.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in Evolution. Williams, pp. 397. Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.archive.org/details/citiesinevolutio00gedduoftGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hendler, J. and Allemang, D. (2008). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kundra, V. (2010, November 15). Keynote. International Open Government Conference, http://www.data.gov/conferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Masinter, L., Alvestrand, H., Zigmond, D. and Petke, R. (1999). Guidelines for new URL Schemes. Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2718.txtGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meskell, D. (2007). New Opportunities for Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. GSA no. 20 (Fall): 2–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myers, J. (2009, June 5). Best Buy Local Store Sites Go Semantic With Good Relations Ontology. Message posted to http://jay.beweep.com/2009/06/05/best-buy-local-stores-goessemantic-with-good-relations-ontology/Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Myers, J. (2011, April 26). Released! Human Product Discovery via Machines, RDFa and "Shop URLs". Message posted to http://jay.beweep.com/2011/04/26/released-humanproduct-discovery-via-machines-rdfa-and-shop-urls/Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. Hodder & Stoughton, page 14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noveck, B. (2009).Wiki Government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Obama, B. (2009, January 20). Transparency and Open Government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sauermann, L. and Cyganiak, R. (2008) Cool URIs for the Semantic Web. W3C Semantic Web Interest Group Note. Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schaefer, R. (2010, November 15). "Climate Change & SpaceWeather - Critical Needs". First International Open Government Conference, US Department of Commerce,Washington DC.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Styles, R. (2011, April 21). "Choosing URIs is not a five minute task". Message posted to http://blogs.talis.com/platform-consulting/2011/04/21/choosing-uris-not-a-five-minute-task/Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    UK Cabinet Office (2010, May 10). "Designing URI Sets for the UK Public Sector". Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/designing-urisets-uk-public-sectorGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    World Wide Web Consortium (2009, February 7). Guidance on The Self-Describing Web. Finding of the Technical Architecture Group. Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/selfDescribingDocuments.htmlGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    World Wide Web Consortium (2011, May 10). "Open Web Platform Progress Drives Expanding Industry Interest". Press Release. Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.w3.org/2011/05/membership-pr.htmlGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Wide Web Consortium (2011, June 6). "Government Linked Data Working Group Charter". Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter.htmlGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wood, D. (1999). Programming Internet Email. OReilly&Associates, Sebasapol, California.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wood, D. (Ed.). (2011). Linking Enterprise Data. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wood, D. (2011, February 8). Semantic Web Elevator Pitch. Message posted to http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2011/02/semantic-web-elevator-pitch.htmlGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.3 Round Stones Inc.FredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations