CSCL@Networking: Regional Learning in Software Industries

  • Markus RohdeEmail author
  • Volker Wulf
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series book series (CULS, volume 14)


This chapter presents a longitudinal empirical study of regional learning among software companies facilitated by a university in an action research manner. Grounded in the concept of social capital and sociocultural theories of learning, different measures in support of regional learning were conducted over several years. This chapter describes the action research approach taken which includes the following: (1) initializing informal talks and meeting to learn about the region and to build up social capital, (2) a series of networking events involving academics, local authorities, and regional software companies, (3) the didactical concept of courses in practice (CiP), and (4) an EU funded networking project with software and media companies. The achievements and obstacles of this approach are discussed with respect to the specific historical situation for collaborative learning in regional networks. Adding to a CSCL@Work research agenda, the chapter argues for a better exploration of regional learning across organizational boundaries.


Social Capital Collaborative Learning Regional Cluster Media Industry Symbolic Capital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ackerman, M., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2003). Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pike, G. Becattini, & W. Segenberger (Eds.), International districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000a). Mysteries of the region. In W. Millar et al. (Eds.), The silicon valley edge (pp. 16–39). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000b). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. C. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duguid, P. (2003). “Incentivising Practise,” Position paper for the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the European Commission. Workshop on “ICT and Social Capital in the Knowledge Society,” Seville, November 2–3, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Duguid, P. (2005). “The Art of Knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community. The Information Society, 21, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etzioni, A. (1995). New communitarian thinking. Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlotteville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, G., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 9–40. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guiliani, E. (2005). Cluster absorptive capacities: Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind? European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huysman, M. H., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2004a). Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  17. Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2004b). Social capital and IT—Current debates and research. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huysman, M. H., & Wulf, V. (2005). The role of information technology in building and sustaining the relational base of communities. The Information Society, 21, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazerson, M. H. (1990). Subcontracting in the modena knitwear industry. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Lesser, E., Fontaine, M. A., & Jason, A. (Eds.). (2000). Knowledge and communities. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lockemann, P. C. (2004). Technology transfer: Political pressure, economic necessity, social phenomenon, financial reward, or intellectual pleasure? Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 2(2), 133–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  30. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origin and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. Reichling, T., Moos, B., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2010). Towards regional clusters: Networking events, collaborative research, and the business finder. In D. Randall & P. Salambier (Eds.), From CSCW to Web 2.0: European developments in collaborative design (pp. 43–61). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reichling, T., Wulf, V., & Moos, B. (2008). Business finder—A tool for regional networking among organizations. In Proceedings of Knowledge Management in Action (KMIA 2008), held in conjunction with the 20th IFIP World Computer Congress (WCC 2008), pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
  37. Reichling, T., Veith, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Expert Recommender: Designing for a Network Organization. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW 2007), Vol. 16, No. 4–5, 431–465.Google Scholar
  38. Rohde, M., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). The reality is our lab: Communities of practice in applied computer science. Behavior and Information Technology, 26(1), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rohde, M., Klamma, R., & Wulf, V. (2005). Communities of practice in networks between students and start-up companies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2005. Taipei, Taiwan, May 30–Jun 4, 2005.Google Scholar
  40. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., & Stevens, G. (2011). Engaging with practices: Design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2011) (pp. 505–512). New York: ACM-Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems and New MediaUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  2. 2.University of Siegen and Fraunhofer FIT Siegen (BeFIT)SiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations