Advertisement

Models for Impact Assessment of Wind-Based Power Generation on Frequency Control

  • Alejandro D. Domínguez-García
Chapter
Part of the Power Electronics and Power Systems book series (PEPS, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter develops a modeling framework for studying the impact of variability and uncertainty in wind-based electricity generation on power system frequency. The focus is on timescales involving governor response (primary frequency control) and automatic generation control (AGC) (secondary frequency control). The framework includes models of synchronous generators, wind-based electricity sources, the electrical network, and the AGC system. The framework can be used to study the impact of different renewable penetration scenarios on system frequency performance metrics. In order to illustrate the framework, a simplified model of the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system is developed.

Keywords

Optimal Power Flow Synchronous Generator Synchronous Machine Ordinary Differential Equation Model Wind Power Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Global Climate and Energy Project. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Stanford University, the Sponsors of the Global Climate and Energy Project, or others involved with the Global Climate and Energy Project.

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Energy. The smart grid: an introduction [Online]. Available: http://www.oe.energy.gov/smartgrid.htm
  2. 2.
    Hirst E (2002) Integrating wind output with bulk power operations and wholesale electricity markets. Wind Energ 5(1):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eriksen P, Ackermann T, Abildgaard H, Smith P, Winter W, Garcia JR (2005) System operation with high wind penetration. IEEE Power Energ Mag 3(6):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeMeo E, Jordan G, Kalich C, King J, Milligan M, Murley C, Oakleaf B, Schuerger M (2007) Accommodating wind’s natural behavior. IEEE Power Energ Mag 5(6):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahlstrom M, Jones L, Zavadil R, Grant W (2005) The future of wind forecasting and utility operations. IEEE Power Energ Mag 3(6):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eto J et al (2010) Use of frequency response metrics to assess the planning and operating requirements for reliable integration of variable renewable generation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4142E, December 2010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Undrill J (2010) Power and frequency control as it relates to wind-powered generation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4143E, December 2010Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martinez C, Xue S, Martinez M (2010) Review of the recent frequency performance of the eastern, western and ercot interconnections. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4144E, December 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Illian H (2010) Frequency control performance measurement and requirements. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4145E, December 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackin P et al (2010) Dynamic simulations studies of the frequency response of the three U.S. interconnections with increased wind generation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4146E, December 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coughlin K, Eto J (2010) Analysis of wind power and load data at multiple time scales. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical Report LBNL-4147E, December 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debs A (ed) (1988) Modern power systems control and operation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kundur P (1994) Power system stability and control. McGraw Hill Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wood A, Wollenberg B (eds) (1996) Power generation, operation, and control. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ilic M, Zaborzky J (eds) (2000) Dynamics and control of large electric power systems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen YC, Domímguez-García A (2011) Assessing the impact of wind variability on power system small-signal reachability. In: Proceedings of Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI, January 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauer P, Pai A (1998) Power system dynamics and stability. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pulgar H (2010) Wind farm model for power system stability analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pulgar-Painemal HA, Sauer PW (2011) Towards a wind farm reduced-order model. Electric Power Systems Research 81(8):1688–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ackermann T (2005) Wind power in power systems. Wiley, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hespanha J (2005) A model for stochastic hybrid systems with application to communication networks. Nonlinear Anal Spec Issue Hybrid Syst 62(8):1353–1383MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hespanha J (2007) Modeling and analysis of stochastic hybrid systems. IEE Proc Contr Theor Appl Spec Issue Hybrid Syst 153:520–535CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations