Wholesale Energy Market in a Smart Grid: A Discrete-Time Model and the Impact of Delays

Part of the Power Electronics and Power Systems book series (PEPS, volume 3)


The main foundations of the emerging Smart Grid are (1) Distributed Energy Resources (DER) enabled primarily by intermittent, nondispatchable renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, and independent microgrids and (2) Demand Response (DR), the concept of controlling loads via cyber-based communication and control and economic signals. While smart grid communication technologies offer dynamic information provide real-time signals to utilities, they inevitably introduce delays in the energy real-time market. In this article, a dynamic, discrete-time model of the wholesale energy market that captures these interactions is derived. Beginning with a framework that includes optimal power flow and real-time pricing, this model is shown to capture the dynamic interactions between generation, demand, and locational marginal price near the equilibrium of the optimal dispatch. It is shown that the resulting dynamic real-time market has stability properties that are dependent on the delay due to the measurement and communication. Numerical studies are reported to illustrate the dynamic model, and a suitable communication topology is suggested.


  1. 1.
    Torre S, Contreras J, Conejo A (2004) Finding multiperiod nash equilibria in pool-based electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19:643–651Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosen J (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave N-person games. Econom 33:520–534MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry CA, Hobbs BF, Meroney WA, ÓNeill RP, Stewart WR (1999) Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: A game theoretic approach. Utilities Policy 8:139–158Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardell JB, Hitt CC, Hogan WW (1997) Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks. Resource Energy, Econom 19:109–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hobbs BF, Metzler CB, Pang J-S (2000) Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nasser T-O (1998) Transmission congestion contracts and strategic behavior in generation. Electricity J 11:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wei J-Y, Smeers Y (1999) Spatial oligopolistic electricity models with Cournot generators and regulated transmission prices. Oper Res 47:102–112MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cunningham LB, Baldick R, Baughman ML (2002) An empirical study of applied game theory: Transmission constrained Cournot behavior. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrero RW, Rivera JF, Shahidehpour SM (1998) Application of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bai X, Shahidehpour SM, Ramesh VC, Yu E (1997) Transmission analysis by Nash game method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:1046–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. level Advisory Group on ICT for Smart Electricity Distribution Networks (2009) Ict for a low carbon economy smart electricity distribution networks. European Commission, Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nutaro J, Protopoescu V (2010) The impact of market clearing time and price signal delay on the sability of electric power market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:1337–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alvarado F, Meng J, Mota W, DeMarco C (2000) Dynamic coupling between power markets and power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 4:2201–2205Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hermans R, Jokic A, van den Bosch P, Frunt J, Kamphuis I, Warmer C (2010) Limitations in the design of ancillary service markets imposed by communication network delays. In: 7th international conference on the european energy market (EEM), Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiani A, Annaswamy AM (2010) The effect of a smart meter on congestion and stability in a power market. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiani A, Annaswamy A (2011) Wholesale energy market in a smart grid: Dynamic modeling, and stability. In: IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carpentier J (1985) Optimal power flow, uses, methods and development, planning and operation of electrical energy system. In: Proceedings of IFAC symposium, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alsac O, Stott B (1974) Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Trans Power Syst 93:745–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hakim L, Kubokawa J, Yuan Y, Mitani T, Zoka Y, Yorino N, Niwa Y, Shimomura K, Takeuchi A (2009) A study on the effect of generation shedding to total transfer capability by means of transient stability constrained optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang H, Murillo-Schnchez CE, Zimmerman RD, Thomas RJ (2007) On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22:1185–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehrotra S (1992) On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point method. SIAM J Optim 2(4):575–601MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wei H, Sasaki H, Kubakawa J, Yokoyama R (1998) An interior point nonlinear programming for an interior point nonlinear programming for optimal power flow problems with a novel data structure. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13:870–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu Y, Debs A, Marsten R (1994) A direct nonlinear predictor corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9:876–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kiani A, Annaswamy AM (2010) Perturbation analysis of market equilibrium in the presence of renewable energy resources and demand response. In: IEEE innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT), Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Marke ZL (2002) Operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling and risk management. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roozbehani M, Dahleh M, Mitter S (2010) On the stability of wholesale electricity markets under real-time pricing. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MacCormack J, Hollis A, Zareipour H, Rosehart W (2010) The large-scale integration of wind generation: Impacts on price, reliability and dispatchable conventional suppliers. Energy Policy 38:3837–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    dong Tang Y, Wu J, Zou Y (2001) The research on the stability of power market. Autom Electr Power Syst 25:11–16Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bertsekas DP (2001) Dynamic programming and optimal control. Athena Scientific, BelmontMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertsekas DP (1999) Nonlinear programming. Athena Scientific, BelmontMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keith Briggs FK, Smith M (2010) Explicit congestion control: charging, fairness and admission management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shakkottai S, Johari R (2010) Demand-aware content distribution on the internet. IEEE ACM Trans Network 18:476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Papachristodoulou A, Jadbabaie A (2010) Delay robustness of nonlinear internet congestion control schemes. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 55:1421–1428CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shahidehpour M, Alomoush M (2001) Restructured electrical power systems, operation trading and volatility. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee B, Lee J (1999) Delay-dependent stability criteria for discerete-time delay systems. In: American control conference, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meyn S, Negrete M, Wang G, Kowli A, Shafieepoorfard E (2010) The value of volatile resources in electricity markets. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Caramanis M, Foster J (2009) Management of electric vehicle charging to mitigate renewable energy intermittency and distribution network congestion. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kok K, Warmer C, Kamphuis R (2010) Intelligence in electricity networks for embedding renewables and distribution generation. In: Negenborn RR, Lukszo Z, Hellendoorn J (eds) Intelligent infrastructures, vol 42. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Automatic Control EngineeringTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations