Wideband Monaural Envelope Correlation Perception

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (volume 787)

Abstract

This study investigated monaural envelope correlation perception (Richards 1987) for noise bandwidths ranging from 25 to 1,600 Hz. The high-frequency side of the low band was fixed at 3,000 Hz and the low-frequency side of the high band was fixed at 3,500 Hz. When comodulated, the magnitude spectra of the pair of noise bands were either identical or reflected around the midpoint. Six listeners with normal hearing participated. Listeners showed similar performance for identical and reflected-spectrum conditions, with best performance usually occurring for bandwidths between 200 and 800 Hz. Results were considered in terms of envelope comparisons of waveforms at the outputs of multiple peripheral filters or envelope comparisons of waveforms at the outputs of central filters set to the bandwidths of the noise stimuli. Some aspects of the results were incompatible with the account based on multiple peripheral filters. However, the results of a supplementary condition involving the gating of band subregions indicated that this incompatibility could be accounted for by nonoptimal weighting of peripheral filter outputs.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NIH NIDCD grant R01-000418.

References

  1. Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2002) Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1026–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buss E, Hall JW, Grose JH (2013) Monaural envelope correlation perception for bands narrower or wider than a critical band. J Acoust Soc Am 133(1):405–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dau T, Verhey J, Kohlrausch A (1999) Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2752–2760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher H (1940) Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 12:47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47:103–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall JW, Grose JH (1993) Monaural envelope correlation perception in listeners with normal hearing and cochlear impairment. J Speech Hear Res 36:1306–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kohlrausch A, Fassel R (2000) The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 108:723–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore BCJ, Emmerich DS (1990) Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2628–2633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Patterson RD (1976) Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 59:640–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richards VM (1987) Monaural envelope correlation perception. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1621–1630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Richards VM (1988a) Aspects of monaural synchrony detection. In: Duifhuis H, Horst J, Wit H (eds) Basic issues in hearing: proceedings of the 8th international symposium on hearing. Academic, New York, pp 317–322Google Scholar
  12. Richards VM (1988b) Components of monaural envelope correlation perception. Hear Res 35:47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richards VM (1989) Comparing monotic, diotic, and dichotic presentation modes in synchrony detection. J Acoust Soc Am 1(Suppl):s143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Studebaker GA (1985) A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28:455–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Viemeister NF (1979) Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1364–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph W. HallIII
    • 1
  • Emily Buss
    • 1
  • John H. Grose
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations