The Learning Potentials of Number Blocks

  • Gunver MajgaardEmail author
  • Morten Misfeldt
  • Jacob Nielsen


In this paper it is described how an interactive cubic user-configurable modular robotic system can be used to support learning about numbers and their pronunciation. The development is done in collaboration with a class of 7–8 year old children and their mathematics teacher. The tool is called Number Blocks, and it combines physical interaction, learning, and immediate feedback. Number Blocks support the children’s understanding of place value in the sense that it allows them to experiment with large numbers. We found that the blocks contributed to the learning process in several ways. The blocks combined mathematics and play, and they included and supported children at different academic levels. The auditory representation, especially the enhanced rhythmic effects of using speech synthesis, helped the children to pronounce large numbers. This creates a new context for learning mathematical aspects of number names and the place value system.


Mathematics Teacher Proximal Development Sound Modality Number Block Learning Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barab, S., Squire, K., 2004.“Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground”, The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, Gregory, 2000 (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Forlaget Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-03906-4Google Scholar
  3. Dowker, A., Bala, S., Lloyd, D. 2008. Linguistic influences on Mathematical Development: How Important Is the Transparency of the Counting System? In Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, August 2008, 523–538Google Scholar
  4. Duval, R. 2006. A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61.Google Scholar
  5. Ejersbo L. R., Misfeldt, M. (2011) Danish Number Names and Number Concepts, presented at the 7th Conference for European Research on Mathematics Education, Rzesow February 2011Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewin, Kurt, 1946. “Action research and minority problems”, Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 2, No. 4, 1946, s 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Majgaard, G., 2010. Design based action research in the world of robot technology and learning. In The Third IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning: DIGITAL 2010 (s. 85–92). IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  9. Majgaard, G., 2009a. An outline of interaction types in physical serious games. Proceedings of IADIS Game and Entertainment Technologies 2009.Algarve, Portugal, pp.128–130Google Scholar
  10. Majgaard, G., 2009b. The Playground in the Classroom - Fractions and Robot Technology. Proceedings in Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. IADIS Press, 2009. Rome, Italy pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  11. Miura I. T., Okamota, Y. (1989): Comparisons of U.S. and Japanese first graders’ cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value. In Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 pp. 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nemirovsky, R., Borba, M., Dimattia, C., Arzarello, F., Robutti, O., Schnepp, M., Chazan, D., Scheffer, N. (2004) PME Special Issue: Bodily Activity and Imagination in Mathematics Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57 (3) pp. 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nielsen, J., 2008a. User Configurable Modular Robotics - Control and Use. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  14. Nielsen, J., Jessen, C. & Bærendsen, N.K., 2008b. RoboMusicKids – Music Education with Robotic Building Blocks. The 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL), 149–156.Google Scholar
  15. Papert, S., 1980. Mindstorms. Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. 2. Ed. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M., 2008. New Pathways into Robotics: Strategies for Broadening Participation. In Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think In Action, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  18. Steinbring, H. (2006): What makes a sign a mathematical sign? – an epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies of Mathematics 61, pp.133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van den Akker, J. et al., 2007. Education Design Research. Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Vygotsky, L., S., 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wenger E., 1998. Communities of practice Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., & Resnick, M. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-inspired Manipulatives. CHI -CONFERENCE, 859–868.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunver Majgaard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Morten Misfeldt
    • 2
  • Jacob Nielsen
    • 3
  1. 1.The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller InstituteUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  2. 2.The Danish School of EducationAarhus UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Center for PlaywareTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations