Advertisement

Additional Adaptations Against Predation

  • Richard H. Yahner
Chapter

Abstract

As butterflies, monarchs (Danaus plexippus) (Fig. 7.1) do not fight predators or act passively if an attack by a predator is imminent; instead, the monarch uses warning coloration and chemical defenses against predation. As adults, monarchs are brightly colored in orange, black, and white; they, therefore, stand out in the environment to a predator, much like the pattern of a poisonous coral snake (Micrurus fulvius) (Zug et al. 2001). What does the coloration of a monarch signal to a potential predator? That is unpalatable, so stay away. Monarch becomes unpalatable because of toxins that larvae feed upon in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). These toxins are cardio glycosides, which elicits vomiting in birds that may feed upon them. Only two bird species, the black-headed oriole (Icterus abeillei) and the black-headed grosbeak (Pheucticus melanocephalus) are known to feed on monarch with no ill effect. In fact, the viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) mimics the coloration of the monarch to offset predation on it, which is a form of mimicry known as Batesian.

Keywords

Black Bear Brood Parasite Spotted Hyena Batesian Mimicry Antipredator Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrette C (1977) Fighting behavior in muntjac and the evolution of antlers. Evolution 31:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertram CRB (1978) Living in groups. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 64–96Google Scholar
  3. Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock TH, O’Rianin MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or misinformation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 282–309Google Scholar
  6. Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards ED, Gentili P, Horak M, Kristensen NP, Nielsen ES (1999) The cossoid/sesioid assemblage. In: Kristensen NP (ed) Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp 183–185Google Scholar
  8. Eibel-Eibesfeldt I (1970) Ethology: the biology of behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 530 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  10. Gill FR (1990) Onithology. W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, 660 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodenough McGuire, Wallace J, McGuire B, Wallace RA (2001) Perspectives on animal behavior, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 542 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ (1978) Anti-predator defence strategies: some evolutionary problems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 129–151Google Scholar
  13. Husak JF, Macedonia JM, Fox SF, Sauceda RC (2006) Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay-covered model lizards. Ethology 112:572–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kingdon J (1984) The zebra’s stripes: an aid to group cohesion? In: MacDonald D (ed) The encyclopedia of mammals. Facts on File Publications, New York, pp 486–487Google Scholar
  15. Krebs JR (1978) Optimal tactics of reproduction and life-history. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 23–63Google Scholar
  16. Mech LD (1984) Predators and predation. In: Halls LK (ed) White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Washington, DC, pp 189–200Google Scholar
  17. Moment GB (1962) Reflexive selection: a possible answer to an old question. Science 136:262–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morse DH (1980) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. The Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 383 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2006) A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS One 1(1):e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000132 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parrish JK (1989) Re-examining the selfish herd: are central fish safer? Anim Behav 38:1048–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Partridge L (1978) Habitat selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 351–376Google Scholar
  22. Pasteur G (1982) A classificatory review of mimicry systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:169–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pough FH (1976) Multiple cryptic effects of cross-banded and ringed patterns of snakes. Copeia 1976:834–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pough FH, Janis CM, Heister JB (2002) Vertebrate life, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle, NJGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers LL (1980) Inheritance of coat color and changes in pelage coloration in black bears in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal 61:324–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sargent TD (1969) Behavioural adaptations of cryptic moths. III. Resting attitudes of two bark-like species, Melanolophia canadaria and Cotocala ultronia. Anim Behav 17:670–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaller GB (1967) The deer and the tigers study life in India. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaffer LL (1995) Pennsylvania amphibians and reptiles. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, HarrisburgGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherman P (1977) Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197:1246–1253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaughan TA, Ryan JM, Czaplewski NJ (2000) Mammalogy. Saunders, New York, 565 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Walther FR (1969) Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in Thomson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsonsi Guenther 1884). Behaviour 34:184–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yahner RH (1980b) Barking in a primitive ungulate, Muntiacus reevesi: function and adaptiveness. Am Nat 114:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yahner RH (2001) Fascinating mammals: conservation and ecology in the mid-eastern States. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  34. Zug GR, Vitt LJ, Calwell JP (2001) Herpetology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Yahner
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations