Skip to main content

EU Legislative Activities and Domestic Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC))

Abstract

Much of the Europeanization debate revolves around the impact of Brussels on the domestic legislatures of the member states, in particular the domination of their legislatures by the binding and enforceable activities of the EU. Because this impact is a direct result of the amount of legislative activities at the EU level, this chapter documents EU legislative decision-making and explores the consequences of treaty revisions and enlargements, which have changed the goals and conditions for EU legislative decision-making over time. The famous prediction of the former Commission president Jacques Delors, claiming that 80% of economic legislation, perhaps of taxation and social legislation, would originate in Brussels (6.7.1988. EP 2-367/157), was made at the end of the 1980s when EU legislative activities had reached a peak in the attempt to complete the Common Market by the effective application of qualified majority voting in the Council of Minister until the end of 1992.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borghetto E, Franchino F, Giannetti D (2006) Complying with the transposition deadlines of EU directives. Evidence from Italy. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 2(1):7–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursens P (2002) Why Denmark and Belgium have different implementation records: on transposition laggards and leaders in the EU. Scand Polit Stud 25(2):173–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke D, König T, Proksch S, Tsebelis G (2012) Reforming the European Union: realizing the impossible. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchino F, Hoyland B (2009) Legislative involvement in parliamentary systems: opportunities, conflict, and institutional constraints. Am Polit Sci Rev 103(4):607–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König T, Bräuninger T (2004) Accession and reform of the European Union. A game-theoretical analysis of eastern enlargement and the constitutional reform. Eur Union Polit 5(4):419–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König T, Mäder L (2007) Bürokratisierung oder Politisierung? Eine Untersuchung der Umsetzungseffekte von Europäischen Richtlinien in den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union im Zeitraum von 1985–2003. In: Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung of Speyerer Forschungsberichte. Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung, Speyer

    Google Scholar 

  • König T, Junge D (2009) Why don't veto players use their power? Eur Union Polit 10(4):507–534

    Google Scholar 

  • König T, Luetgert B (2009) Troubles with transposition? Explaining trends in member-state notification and the delayed transposition of EU directives. Br J Polit Sci 39(1):163–194

    Google Scholar 

  • König T, Luetgert B, Dannwolf T (2006) Quantifying European legislative research: using CELEX and PreLex in EU legislative studies. Eur Union Polit 7(4):553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetgert B, Dannwolf T (2009) Mixing methods: an analysis of EU member state transposition patterns. Eur Union Polit 10(3):307–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek E (2003) Surviving the deadline: the transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands. Eur Union Polit 4(4):371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz H, König T (2000) Institutional reform and decision-making efficiency in the European Union. Am J Polit Sci 44(4):653–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Töller AE (2008) Mythen und Methoden. Zur Messung der Europäisierung der Gesetzgebung des Deutschen Bundestages jenseits des 80-Prozent-Mythos. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 1:3–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas König .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Policy fields over time

Appendix: Policy fields over time

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

König, T., Dannwolf, T., Luetgert, B. (2012). EU Legislative Activities and Domestic Politics. In: Brouard, S., Costa, O., König, T. (eds) The Europeanization of Domestic Legislatures. Studies in Public Choice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1502-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics