Ecological, Social and Financial Issues Related to Fencing as a Conservation Tool in Africa

  • Peter A. Lindsey
  • Chap L. Masterson
  • Andrew L. Beck
  • Stephanie Romañach

Abstract

Fencing is commonly used as a tool in wildlife management in Africa, particularly in the southern part of the continent. Fencing confers a number of advantages to wildlife managers including: the ability to utilize small habitat fragments and conserve wildlife in otherwise human-dominated landscapes by reducing edge-effects on large mammals; enabling intensive management practices (e.g. holding of wildlife in pre-release pens, separating genders or individuals, and protecting specific habitat types from certain species); and acting as a tool in disease control. Fencing is a potentially important tool in reducing human-wildlife conflict, and can assist in protecting wildlife from illegal hunting. Finally, fencing is important in the allocation of ownership and/or user-rights over wildlife and was important in providing the legal basis for the development of wildlife-based land uses on private land. However, there are a number of problems associated with the use of fencing, which can be categorized as ecological, epidemiological, social and financial. Ecological and epidemiological issues include: the inhibition of ecological processes such as migration; high levels of mortality of some species (particularly reptiles) along fence lines; and failure to achieve key objectives relating to disease control. Social issues include: negative community perceptions towards fences in some areas due to a feeling that they are an exclusive imposition; and, the importance of fence as sources of material for snares for illegal hunters. Financial issues include: the fact that fencing influences (and in some cases limits) land use options; and that fencing is costly to erect and maintain. Solutions to some of these problems include: using the minimum amount of fencing possible to achieve management objectives; where possible enlarging wildlife areas encompassed by fencing, or amalgamating adjacent areas; re-thinking the use of fences for veterinary purposes and using alternative strategies (such as commodity-based trading, or relaxation of veterinary controls in favour of wildlife-based land uses); conducting adequate environmental and social impact assessments to minimize ecological problems and social conflicts resulting from the construction of fencing; and re-designing fences to reduce mortality due to entanglement.

References

  1. AHEAD (2008) Report of the workshop held at Chobe Marina Lodge, Kasane, Botswana 11 to 14 November 2008. Available from: http://www.wcsahead.org/documents/sadc_tfcas_tads_nov08.pdf.
  2. Albertson, A. (1998) Northern Botswana veterinary fences: critical ecological impacts. Okavango Peoples Trust report, Gabarone.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. & Patterson, C. (2006) Sport hunting in the SADC Region: an overview. TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. (2007) Shocking impacts of electric fences. Endangered Wildlife Trust report, available at http://www.ewt.org.za/news_fullstory.aspx?status=0&newsID=445
  5. Ben-Shahar, R. (1993) Does fencing reduce carrying capacity for populations of large herbivores? Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9, 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, I., Child, B., de la Harpe, D., Jones, B., Barnes, J. & Anderson, H. (2004). Private-land contribution to conservation in South Africa. Parks in transition. (ed Child, B.) pp. 29–62. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  7. Boone, R. & Hobbs, N. (2004) Lines around fragments: effects of fencing on large herbivores. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 21,147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bothma, J. du P. (2002) Some economics of game ranching. In B. Penzhorn (ed), Proceedings of a symposium on game ranch planning and management Onderstepoort: Wildlife Group, SA Veterinary Association, 23–40.Google Scholar
  9. Bothma, J. du P. & du Toit, J.G. (eds) (2009) Game ranch management, fifth edition. van Schaik, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  10. Burger, M. & Branch, W. (1994) Tortoise mortality caused by electrified fences in the Thomas Baines Nature Reserve. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 24, 32–37.Google Scholar
  11. Caro, T.M. & Scholte, P. (2007) When protection falters. African Journal of Ecology, 45, 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caughley, G. (1994) Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Child, B., McKean, S., Kiss, A., Munthali, S., Jones, B., Mtsambiwa, M., Castley, G., Patton, C., Magome, H., Pangeti, G. & Fearnhead, P. (2004) Park agencies, performance and society in southern Africa. Parks in transition. (ed. Child, B) pp. 125–164. Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Cumming, D. (2004a) Performance of parks in a century of change. Parks in transition. (ed. Child, B) pp. 105–204. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Cumming, D. (2004b) Movements and Seasonal migrations of large mammals in the four corners area. Biodiversity of the Four Corners area. (eds. Timberlake, J. & Childes, S.) pp. 444–457. Technical Reviews. Biodiversity Foundation, Bulawayo.Google Scholar
  16. Davies-Mostert, H.T., Mills, M.G.L. & MacDonald, D.W. (2009) South Africa’s wild dog Lycaon pictus meta-population management programme. The re-introduction of top-order predators. (eds. Hayword, M.W. & Somers, M.J.). pp. 10–42. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. du Toit, R. (1998) Case study of policies that support sustainable development in Africa: the Savé Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe. Paper presented at: A workshop on African perspective of policies which support sustainable development. The Scandinavian Seminar College, Harare.Google Scholar
  18. du Toit, R. (2005) Foot-and- mouth disease management and land-use implications in the Zimbabwean Lowveld: the rationale for creating a biosphere reserve. In: S. Osofsky (ed.), Conservation and development interventions at the wildlife/livestock interface: implications for wildlife, livestock and human health. (pp. 109–112). IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
  19. Els, H. (2002) Rural development and game ranch management. Game Ranch Management. (ed. Bothma, J & du P.) pp. 677–686. van Schaik, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, M.D., Gichohi, N., Kamau, F., Aike, G., Craig, B., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Adams, W.M. (2009) The Use of Electrified Fences to Reduce Human Elephant Conflict: A Case Study of the Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Laikipia District, Kenya, Working Paper 1, Laikipia Elephant Project, Nanyuki, Kenya.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, C., Bengis, R., Balfour, D. & Peel, M. (2007) Controlling the distribution of elephants. The 2007 scientific assessment of elephant management in South Africa. (eds. Mennell, K. & Scholes, R.) Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  22. Grant, C., Davidson, T., Funston, P. & Pienaar, D. (2002) Challenges faced in the conservation of rare antelope: a case study on the northern basalt plains of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe, 45, 45–62.Google Scholar
  23. Grossman. D. & Holden, P. (2009) Towards transformation: contractual national parks in South Africa. Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation. (eds. Such, H., Child, B. & Spenceley, A.), pp. 357–372. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  24. Hayward, M.W. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2009) Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biological Conservation, 142, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayward, M.W. & Somers, M. J. (eds.) (2009) Reintroduction of top-order predators. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Hayward, M.W., O’ Brien, J. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2007) Carrying capacity of large African predators: predictions and tests. Biological Conservation, 139, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayward, M.W., Hayward, G.J., Druce, D. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2008) Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 887–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Humavindu, M.N. & Barnes, J.L. (2003) Trophy hunting in the Namibian economy: an assessment. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 33, 65–70.Google Scholar
  29. Hoare, R.E. (1992) Present and future use of fencing in the management of larger African mammals. Environmental Conservation, 19, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofmeyr, M. (2001) Introduction of the African wild dog Lycaon pictus to game reserves. Proceedings of a Symposium on the re-introduction of larger mammals to game reserves. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences report, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  31. Hrabar, H. & du Toit, J.G. (2005) Dynamics of a protected black rhino (Diceros bicornis) population: Pilanesberg National Park, South Africa. Animal Conservation, 8, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunter, L., Pistorius, K., Carlisle, M., Rickleton, C., Walker, C., Slotow, R. & Skinner, J.D. (2007) Restoring lions Panthera leo to northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africashort-term biological and technical success but equivocal long-term conservation. Oryx, 41, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kassilly, F. (2002) The fence as a moderator of the wildlife menace in Kenya. African Journal of Ecology, 40, 407–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kock, R. (2005) What is this infamous “wildlife/livestock disease interface?” A review of current knowledge for the African continent. Conservation and development interventions at the wildlife/livestock interface implications for wildlife, livestock and human health. (ed. Osofsky, S.), pp. 1–13. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
  35. Krug, W. (2001) Private supply of protected land in southern Africa. Workshop paper on market creation for biodiversity products and services Paris: World Bank/OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Lamarque, F., Anderson, J., Chardonnet, P., Fergusson, R., la Grange, M., Osei-Owusu, Y., Bakker, L., Belemsobgo, U., Beytell, B., Boulet, H., Soto, B. & Tabi Tako-Eta, P. (2008) Human-wildlife conflict in Africa: an overview of causes, consequences and management strategies. FAO internet report: http://www.wildlife-conservation.org/en/content/download/1034/4568/file/HumanWildlifeConflict2008.pdf, Washington D.C.
  37. Lindsey, P. & Davies-Mostert, H. (2009) South African Action Plan for the Conservation of cheetahs and African wild dogs. Report from a National Conservation Action Planning Workshop, Bela Bela, Limpopo Province, South Africa, 17–19 June 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Lindsey, P. (2011) An analysis of game meat production and wildlife-based land uses on freehold land in Namibia: linkages with food security. TRAFFIC report, pp. 77, available from: http://www.traffic.org/general-reports/traffic_pub_gen43.pdf. Accessed September 2011.
  39. Lindsey, P., du Toit, J. & Mills, M.G.L. (2005a) The cost efficiency of wild dog conservation in South Africa. Conservation Biology, 19, 1205–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindsey, P., du Toit, J. & Mills, M.G.L. (2005b) Attitudes of ranchers towards African wild dogs Lycaon pictus: conservation implications for wild dogs on private land. Biological Conservation, 125, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindsey, P., Roulet, P. & Romañach, S. (2007) Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Biological Conservation, 134, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindsey, P., du Toit, J., Pole, A. & Romañach, S. (2008) Savé Valley Conservancy: a large scale experiment in cooperative wildlife management. In Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation. (eds. Such, H., Child, B. & Spenceley, A.), pp. 163–186. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  43. Lindsey, P., Romanach, S. & Davies-Mostert, H. (2009) The importance of conservancies for enhancing the value of game ranch land for large mammal conservation in southern Africa. Journal of Zoology, 277, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindsey, P., Romañach, S., Tambling, C. & Chartier, K. (2011) Ecological and financial impacts of illegal bushmeat trade in Zimbabwe. Oryx, 45, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marker, L.L., Mills, M.G.L. & Macdonald, D.W. (2003) Factors influencing perceptions of conflict and tolerance toward cheetahs on Namibian farmlands. Conservation Biology, 17, 1290–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, R. (2005) The influence of veterinary control fences on certain wild large mammal species in the Caprivi, Namibia. Conservation and development interventions at the wildlife/livestock interface implications for wildlife, livestock and human health. (ed. Osofsky, S.), pp 27–39. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
  48. Mbaiwa, J.E. & Mbaiwa, O.I. (2006) The effects of veterinary fences on wildlife populations in Okavango Delta, Botswana. International Journal of Wilderness, 12, 17–41.Google Scholar
  49. McLaughlin, D. (2010). Botswana Beef Industry and EU Trade Policy. Unpublished report, pp. 33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murcia, C. (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 58–62.Google Scholar
  51. National Agricultural Marketing Council (2006) Report on the investigation to identify problems for sustainable growth and development in South African wildlife ranching. National Agricultural Marketing Council Report, 2006 number 3, available from: http://www.namc.co.za/ASSETS/PDF/Report%20on%20Wildlife%20ranching.pdf.
  52. Nelson, A., Bidwell, P. & Sillero-Zubiri, C. (2003) A review of human elephant conflict management strategies. People and Wildlife Initiative. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University. Available from: http://www.peopleandwildlife.org.uk/crmanuals/HumanElephantConflictP&WManual
  53. Norton-Griffiths, M. (2007) How many wildebeest do you need? World economics, 8, 41–64.Google Scholar
  54. Noss, A. (1998) The impacts of cable snare hunting on wildlife populations of the Central African Republic. Conservation Biology, 12, 390–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ogada, M.O., Woodroffe, R., Oguge, N. & Frank, L.G. (2003) Limiting depredation by African carnivores: the role of livestock husbandry. Conservation Biology, 17, 1521–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osborn, L. & Anstey, S. (2002) Elephant/human conflict and community development around the Niassa Reserve, Mozambique. WWF-SARPO Report. Internet http://www.elephantpepper.org/downloads/Niassa%20ele%20report.pdf
  57. Romañach, S. & Lindsey, P. (2008) Conservation implications of prey responses to wild dogs Lycaon pictus during the denning season on wildlife ranches. Animal Conservation, 11, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schumann, M., Schumann, B., Dickman, A., Watson, L. & Marker, L. (2006) Assessing the use of swing gates in game fences as a potential non-lethal predator exclusion technique. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 36, 173–181.Google Scholar
  59. Scoones, I. & Wolmer, W. 2008. Foot-and-mouth disease and market access: challenges for the beef industry in southern Africa. Transboundary animal disease and market access: future options for the beef industry in southern Africa Working Paper 1, Institute for Development Studies, Brighton.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spierenburg, M. & Wels, H. (2006) Securing space. Space and Culture, 9, 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stutmoller, P. (2002) The fencing issue relative to the control of foot-and-mouth disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 969, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, R. (2009) The performance of CAMPFIRE in Zimbabwe: 1989–2006. Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation. (eds. Such, H., Child, B. & Spenceley, A.). pp. 201–222. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, R. & Martin, R. (1987) Effects of veterinary fences on wildlife conservation in Zimbabwe. Environmental Management, 11, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomson, G., Tambi, E., Hargreaves, S., Leyland, T., Catley, A., van’t Klooster, G. & Penrith, M. (2004) International trade in livestock and livestock products. Veterinary Record, 155, 429–433.Google Scholar
  65. van Dyk, G. & Slotow, R. (2003) The effects of fences and lions on the ecology of African wild dogs reintroduced into Pilanesberg National Park, South Africa. African Zoology, 38, 79–94.Google Scholar
  66. van Rooyen, N., du Toit, J.G. & van Rooyen, J. (2002) Fences. Game ranch management. Fourth edition. (ed. Bothma, J. du P.), pp. 79–94. JL van Shaik, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  67. Wels, H. (2000) Fighting over fences: organisational co-operation and reciprocal exchange between the Savé Valley Conservancy and its neighbouring communities. PhD thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  68. Western, D. & Nightingale, M. (2005) Keeping the East African rangelands open and productive. Conservation and People, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
  69. Western, D., Russell, S. & Cuthill, I. (2009). The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. Plos One 4, e6140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilkie, D., Carpenter, J. & Zhang, Q. (2001) The under-financing of protected areas in the Congo Basin: so many parks and so little willingness-to-pay. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williamson, D. & Mbano, M. (1988) Wildebeest mortality during 1983 at Lake Xau, Botswana. African Journal of Ecology, 26, 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Woodroffe, R. & Ginsberg, J. (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280, 2126–2128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. Lindsey
    • 1
  • Chap L. Masterson
    • 2
  • Andrew L. Beck
    • 3
  • Stephanie Romañach
    • 4
  1. 1.Mammal Research InstituteUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Zvakanaka Wild VetsHluhluweSouth Africa
  3. 3.Animal, Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.African Wildlife Conservation FundDoralUSA

Personalised recommendations