Courtroom Considerations in Digital Image Forensics



The manner in which results of digital image forensic investigations are presented in the courtroom can be positively or adversely affected by case law, federal rules, legislative acts, availability of discovery materials, tools, and the use of exhibits. Issues pertinent to effective and successful testimony are addressed, along with suggestions for improvement of methods.


Authentication Certification Custody Daubert Evidence Frye Hash Knowledge Pornography Possession Testimony Thumbnail Timestamps 


  1. 1.
    Mercuri RT (2004) The HIPAA-potamus in Health Care Data Security. Security Watch, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 47(7), July 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United States General Accounting Office (2003) Child pornography is readily accessible over peer-to-peer networks. GAO-03-537T, 13 Mar, 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morse MA, Gaugler AC (2007) Daubert challenges to experts in federal criminal cases: an overlooked defense. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Champion, July 2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevens M (2010) Admissibility of scientific evidence under Daubert. Accessed 22 Oct 2010
  5. 5.
    Wang X, Yin YL, Yu H (2005) Finding collisions in the full SHA-1. In: Shoup V (ed) Crypto 2005, LNCS vol. 3621. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 17–36Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Public Radio (2009) ‘Megan’s Law’ Mom Criticizes ‘Sexting’ Charges, 26 Mar, 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myers C, Doft D (2010) Nothing wrong with jet’s air show maneuver, FAA says. CNN, 19 Oct, 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Notable Software, Inc.PhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations