Young People, Their Families and Social Supports: Understanding Resilience with Complexity Theory

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors take the innovative approach of exploring the way complexity theory can help us understand resilience among young people. The chapter uses a case example to apply three aspects of complexity theory to practice, demonstrating how complexity theory is congruent with an ecological understanding of the supports (family and otherwise) that make resilience more likely.

References

  1. Andriani, P. (2001). Diversity, knowledge and complexity theory: Some introductory issues. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  2. Backett-Milburn, K., Wilson, S., Bancroft, A., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2008). Challenging childhoods: Young people’s accounts of “getting by” in families with substance use problems. Childhood, 15(4), 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belliveau, G., & Beare, D. (2007). Theatre for positive youth development: A model for collaborative play-creating. Applied Theatre Researcher, 7. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/52892/04-beare-belliveau-final.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.
  4. Bloch, D. (2005). Complexity, chaos and non-linear dynamics: A new perspective on career development theory. Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 194–207.Google Scholar
  5. Brodsky, A. E. (1996). Resilient single mothers in risky neighborhoods: Negative psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckle Henning, P. (2010). Disequilibrium, development and resilience through adult life. In Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the ISSS,  Proceedings of the 54th meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo.Google Scholar
  7. Butz, M. (1992). Chaos: An omen of transcendence in the psychotherapy process. Psychological Reports, 71, 827–843.Google Scholar
  8. Butz, M. (1997). Chaos and complexity: Implications for psychological theory and practice. Washington: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, C. (forthcoming). Exploring the career pathways of high school graduates in Canada: A grounded theory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, L., McKinnon, M., & Rains, P. (2001). Creating a family: Perspectives from teen mothers. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 12(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emison, G. (2008). Complex adaptive systems and unconventional progress for the national air quality management system. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 393–414.Google Scholar
  12. Fenwick, T. (2010). Complexity theory, leadership and the traps of utopia. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(2), 90–96.Google Scholar
  13. Geronimus, A. T. (2003). Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon, T. (2000). Tears and laughter in the margins. NORA: Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Handley, K., Horn, S., Kaipuke, R., Maden, B., Maden, E., Stuckey, B., et al. (2009). The Spinafex effect – A theory of change. Wellington: The Families Commission.Google Scholar
  16. Hudson, C. G. (2000). At the edge of chaos: A new paradigm for social work? Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 215–230.Google Scholar
  17. LaBoucane-Benson, P. (2005). A complex ecological framework of aboriginal family resilience. Paper presented at 30th anniversary conference first nations – first thoughts. Centre of Canadian Studies, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.cst.ed.ac.uk/2005conference/papers/LaBoucane-Benson_paper.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.
  18. Ladner, J. (1971). Tomorrow’s tomorrow: The black woman. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  19. Langton, C. (1986). Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physica D, 22, 120–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2009). Introduction: The challenges in researching resilience. In L. Liebenberg & M. Ungar (Eds.), Researching resilience (pp. 3–25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Litaker, D., Tomolo, A., Liberatore, V., Stange, K., & Aron, D. (2006). Using complexity theory to build interventions that improve health care delivery in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason, M. (2009). Making educational development and change sustainable: Insights from complexity theory. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meek, J. (2008). Adaptive intermediate structures and local sustainability advances. Pubic Administration Quarterly, Fall, 415–432.Google Scholar
  26. Meek, J. (2010). Complexity theory for public administration and policy. Editorial. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation, 12(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  27. Mischen, P., & Jackson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Applying complexity theory, knowledge management and social network analysis to policy implementation. Public Administration Quarterly, Fall, 315–338.Google Scholar
  28. Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2007). Drawing out strengths and building capacity in social work with troubled young women. Child and Family Social Work, 13, 2–11.Google Scholar
  29. Munford, R., Sanders, J., & Maden, B. (2006). Small steps and giant leaps at Te Aroha Noa. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 102–112.Google Scholar
  30. Nguyen-Gillham, V., Giacaman, R., Naser, G., & Boyce, W. (2008). Normalising the abnormal: Palestinian youth and the contradictions of resilience in protracted conflict. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16(3), 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Plsek, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal, 323, 625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pryor, R. G. L., & Bright, J. E. H. (2007). Applying chaos theory to careers: Attraction and attractors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2008). Conformity and resistance in self-management strategies of “good girls”. Childhood, 15(4), 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott, D., & O’Neil, D. (1996). Beyond child rescue: Developing child-centred practice as St Lukes. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, A. (2005). Complexity theory for organisational futures studies. Foresight, 7(3), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens, I., & Cox, P. (2008). Complexity theory: Developing new understandings of child protection in field settings and in residential child care. British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1320–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevens, I., & Haslett, P. (2007). Applying complexity theory to risk in child protection practice. Childhood, 14(1), 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trochim, W., & Cabrera, D. (2005). The complexity of concept mapping for policy analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation, 7(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
  39. Ungar, M. (2004). Nurturing hidden resilience in at-risk youth across cultures. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(2), 53–58.Google Scholar
  40. Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ungar, M. (2011). The social and physical ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warren, K., Franklin, C., & Streeter, C. (1998). New directions in systems theory: Chaos and complexity. Social Work, 3(4), 357–373.Google Scholar
  43. Zimmerman, B., & Hayday, B. (1999). A board’s journey into complexity science: Lessons from (and for) staff and board members. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman, B., Lindgberg, C., & Plsek, P. (1998). Nine emerging and connected organisational leadership principles. Retrieved from http://www.plexus­institute.org/ideas/show_elibrary.cfm?id=151. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jackie Sanders
    • 1
  • Robyn Munford
    • 1
  • Linda Liebenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Health and Social ServicesMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Resilience Research Centre and Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations