Advertisement

The Theory, Practice and Pedagogy of Networked Learning

  • Vivien HodgsonEmail author
  • David McConnell
  • Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter draws on the different chapters in this book in an attempt to address four key questions that are important in taking us forward in our understanding of the nature and purpose of networked learning. The ontological and epistemological foundations of networked learning are critically examined. It is argued that networked learning comes from an ontological position that assumes an understanding and view of the world, including learning and teaching that is socio-culturally influenced and constructed. We identify, e-quality, inclusion, critical reflexivity and relational dialogue as key theoretical perspectives and values associated with the pedagogical and socio-technical design of networked learning. Equally important to us, however, is the nature of meaning and understanding of knowledge and of the world that is constructed and how it contributes to the wellbeing of society and the world in which we live. Networked learning places a high value on cooperation and collaboration in the learning process; self-determination; difference; trust; investment of self in the networked learning process; and the role technology plays in connecting and mediating. The popularisation of Web 2.0 practices and technologies has revitalised these educational terms. However, the chapter indicates that an institutional and managerial commitment is required in order for networked learning to become widely accepted in institutions. Our point of view on networked learning is a relational and transformative one, which is equally shaped by the underlying theoretical educational perspective and values with which we approach the pedagogical and the socio-technical design of learning. Learners have agency, and learning is mediated through socio-technical learning infrastructures, pedagogical principles and organisational cultures. The chapter provides new insights building on a relational perspective between agency and structure.

Keywords

Cultural Capital Network Learning Learning Management System Digital Literacy Computer Support Collaborative Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Banks, S.B., McConnell, D., and Bowskill, N. (2008). A feeling or a practice? Achieving interculturality in an e-learning course (pp. 712–719). Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Networked Learning. ISBN 978-1-86220-206-1.Google Scholar
  2. Bordieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  4. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Nielsen, J., Fibiger, B., & Danielsen, O. (2009). Problem and project based learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta.Google Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: a rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, S. (2006). “Inquiries of every imaginable kind”: ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. Sociological Review, 54(3), 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continum.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Goodfellow, R. (2008). New directions in research into learning cultures in online education (pp. 553–559). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning. ISBN 978-1-86220-206-1.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50(3), 473–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Network learning: a paradigm for the twenty-first century. In L. Harasim, S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles, & M. Turoff (Eds.), Learning networks: a field guide to teaching and learning online (pp. 272–278). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson, V., & Reynolds, M. (2005). Consensus, difference and “multiple communities” in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (8th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, C., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Networks and locations for student learning. Learning Media and Technology., 35(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koole, M. (2010). The web of identity: selfhood and belonging in online learning networks (pp. 241–248). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, ISBN 978-1-86220-225-2. Google Scholar
  20. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McConnell, D. (2006). E-learning groups and communities. Maidenhead: SRHE/OU Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mead, G. H. (1967[1934]). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1) (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: partnering for real learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, M., Sclater, M., & Tickner, S. (2002). A critique of participative discourses adopted in networked learning. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Networked learning 2002: a research based conference on e-learning in higher education and lifelong learning (p. 685). Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield (ISBN 0902831 41 0).Google Scholar
  27. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. http://itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm. Accessed April 1, 2011.
  28. Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: learning and knowledge today. http://admin.edna.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2150/34771/1/gs2006_siemens.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2011.
  29. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. Willinsky, J. (2000). The social sciences as information technology. A political economy of practice. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivien Hodgson
    • 1
    Email author
  • David McConnell
    • 2
  • Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld
    • 3
  1. 1.Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Independent Higher Education ConsultantStirlingScotland, UK
  3. 3.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations