Influence of Mechanical Properties and Loading Conditions on the Recovery of Shape Memory Polymers

  • Rui Xiao
  • Xiang Chen
  • Thao. D. Nguyen
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This work presented a parameter study to investigate the influence of material properties and loading conditions on the recovery performance of amorphous shape memory polymers using a recently developed thermoviscoelastic model. The model incorporated the time-dependent effects of both structural relaxation—using a nonlinear Adam-Gibbs model—and viscoelasticity. The model can predict well the unconstrained strain recovery response and stress evolution during constrained recovery process. The materials properties and the loading parameters, including the cooling rate, the annealing time, and the heating rate, were varied one by one to compare the effects on the start and end temperatures and recovery time of the unconstrained recovery response and on the stress hysteresis of the constrained recovery response. The results confirmed experimental observations that unconstrained strain recovery response was mostly influenced by viscoelasticity, while the constrained recovery response resulted from the interaction of many different mechanisms, including structural and stress relaxation, thermal expansion, the modulus of rubbery and glass state. The results also showed that the cooling and heating rates had the largest influence on both recovery responses.

Keywords

Structural Relaxation Strain Recovery Shape Memory Polymer Recovery Response Longe Annealing Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Yakacki, C. M., Shandas, R., Lanning, C., Rech, B., Eckstein, A., Gall, K., Biomaterials, Unconstrained recovery characterization of shape-memory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications.28, 2255. 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    [2]Behl M., Razzaq, M. Y., Lendlein, A., Advanced Materials, Multifunctional Shape-Memory Polymers 22, 3388. 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    [3]Yakacki, C. M., Shandas, R., Safranski, D., Ortega, A. M., Sassaman, K., Gall, K.,. Advanced Functional Materials. Strong, tailored, biocompatible shape-memory polymer networks. 18,2428.2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen, T., Qi, H. J., Castro, F., Long, K. N., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. A thermoviscoelastic model for amorphous shape memory polymers: Incorporating structural and stress relaxation. 56, 2792. 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adam, G., Gibbs, J. H., Journal of Chemical Physics. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in the glass-forming liquids. 43, 139. 1965Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scherer, G. W., Journal of American Ceramic Society. Use of the adam-gibbs equation in the analysis of structural relaxation. 67, 504. 1984Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodge, I., Macromolecules. Effects of annealing and prior history on enthalpy relaxation in glassy polymers: Adam-gibbs formulation of nonlinearity. 20, 2897–2908. 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Xiao
    • 1
  • Xiang Chen
    • 1
  • Thao. D. Nguyen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations