REST for Muscle Contraction Headaches: A Comparison of Two REST Environments Combined with Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training

Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)


Restricted Environmental Stimulation Therapy (REST) has been used for many years by researchers and members of the public to produce relaxation and related benefits. Since flotation REST reportedly enhances attainment of a relaxed yet focused state, it was hypothesized that in combination with Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) training, flotation REST would have a beneficial effect on chronic muscle contraction headache sufferers. Six men and twenty-five women who experienced at least three muscle contraction or tension headaches per week were randomly assigned to one of 4 conditions in the 4 week program: soundproof room, flotation tank and room, tank plus PMR, or room plus PMR. Mean reductions from the baseline headache index (measure of frequency, intensity and duration) across groups were 32% at end of treatment, 15% at 2 months, 31% at 4 months, and 57% at 6 months. The flotation TANK + PMR Training group reported the greatest reduction (74%) at 6 months. No significant differences were found between intervention conditions. There was a significant difference within subjects across time.


Essential Hypertension Relaxation Training Tension Headache Headache Pain Biofeedback Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrasik, F., Holroyd, K.A. & Abell, T. Prevalence of headache within a college student population: A preliminary analysis. Headache, 1980, 19, 384–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, E.B. & Ândrasik, F. Psychological assessment and treatment of headache: Recent developments and emerging issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1982, 50, 859–879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, E.B., Andrasik, F., Ahles, T.A., Teders, S.J. & O’Keefe, D.M. Migraine and Tension Headache: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy 1980, 11, 613–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caviness, V.S. & O’Brien, P. Current concept: Headache. New England Journal of Medicine. 1980, 302(8). 446–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond, S. Headache: Its diagnosis and measurement. Headache. 1979, 19(3). 113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engstrom, D.R. Hypnotic Susceptibility, EEG-Alpha and Self-Regulation. In Consciousness and Self-Regulation, Vol. 1 (G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), New York, NY: Plenum, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Epstein, L.H. & Abel, G.C. An analysis of biofeedback training effects for tension headache patients. Behavior Therapy. 1977, 8, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fine, T.H. & Turner, J.W., Jr. The effect of brief Restricted Environmental Stimulation Therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1982, 20, 567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forgays, D.G. & Belinson, M.J. Is flotation isolation a relaxing environment? Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1986, 6, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, A.P. Nature of headache. Headache. 1979, 19(3). 163–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs, G.D., Heilbronner, R.L. & Stanley, J.M. The effects of short term flotation REST on relaxation: A controlled study. Health Psychology. 1984, 3, 99–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kristeller, J.L., Schwartz, G.E. & Black, H. The use of Restricted Environmental Stimulation Therapy (REST) in the treatment of essential hypertension: two case studies. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1982, 20, 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lilly, J.C. The Deep Self. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. McNair, D.M., Lorr, M. & Droppleman, L.F. EITS Manual for the Profile of Mood States, (POMS). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Morell, D.C. Symptom interpretation in general practice. Journal of Royal College of General Practice. 1972, 22, 297–309.Google Scholar
  16. Newland, C.A., Illis, L.S., Robinson, P.K., Batchelor, B.G. & Waters, W.E. A survey of headaches in an English city. Headache. 1978, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
  17. Phillips, C.A. A psychological analysis of tension headache. In S. Rachman (Ed.) Contributions to Medical Psychology. Vol. 1, New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Pikoff, H. Is the muscular model of headache still viable? A review of conflicting data. Headache, 1984, 24, 186–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R.L. & Lushene, R.E. Manual for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. Suedfeld, P. Restricted Environmental Stimulation: Research and Clinical Applications. New York: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. Suedfeld, P., Roy, C. & Landon, P.B. Restricted Environmental Stimulation Therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1982, 20, 553–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turner, J.W., Jr. & Fine, T.H. Use of a Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique (REST) for induction of relaxation: Effects on plasma Cortisol, ACTH and LH. Presented at the Society for Behavioral Medicine, 3rd Annual Meeting, March, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. West, S. The hell in my head. Hippocrates, 1987, 1, 33–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations