2D Linearized Harmonic Euler Flow Analysis for Flutter and Forced Response

  • D. G. Holmes
  • H. A. Chuang

Abstract

A two dimensional, unsteady, linearized Euler solver has been developed, and applied to both flutter and forced response problems. Solutions are obtained at a single frequency, with the time derivatives ∂Q/∂t replaced by −iωQ. The unsteady solver is derived from an existing steady flow Euler solver that uses adaptive triangular grids. The solver is not restricted to blade row geometries. The solution technique is the false time marching of Ni, used in conjunction with a Runge-Kutta scheme. As with most steady flow Euler solvers, shocks are captured, rather than fitted. The inlet and outlet boundary conditions are the two dimensional single frequency non-reflective boundary conditions due to Giles. For flutter problems, the grid moves with the blade: grid points on the blade surface remain fixed to the blade, and the motion of interior grid points is computed using a Laplacian smoother. Results are shown for three flutter calculations and one forced response calculation.

Potential methods are clearly more efficient than linearized Euler methods, but are restricted to shock free flows, or to flows with weak shocks and shock geometries simple enough to permit shock fitting. This and other investigations have shown that Euler methods can produce results comparable to potential methods. For transonic flows, the unsteady force applied to a blade by an oscillating shock — the “shock foot force” — can depend significantly on the way the shock is modeled. Improvements in the way unsteady Euler solvers treat shocks are required, possibly even extending to making the grid oscillate with the shock. Once the issue of the correct treatment of shocks can be resolved, Euler methods will be able to produce useful solutions in regimes inaccessible to potential methods.

Keywords

Stag Angle Grid Velocity Exit Mach Number Linearize Euler Equation Euler Solver 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Bat90]
    J. T. Batina. Implicit flux-split Euler schemes for unsteady aerodynamic analysis involving unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA Paper 90–0936, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. [BF86]
    A. Bolcs and T. H. Fransson. Aeroelasticity in turbomachines: Comparison of theoretical and experimental cascade results. Communication du Laboratoire de Thermique Appliquée et de Turbomachines Nr. 13, L’École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. [DB74]
    G. Dahlquist and A. Bjorck. Numerical Methods Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. [Gi186]
    M. B. Giles. UNSFLO: A numerical method for unsteady in-viscid flow in turbomachinery. Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Report CFDL-TR-86–6, MIT, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. [Gî188]
    M. B. Giles. Non-reflecting boundary conditions for the Euler equations. Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Report CFDL-TR-88–1, MIT, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [Gi189]
    M. B. Giles. Numerical methods for unsteady turbomachinery flow. In Numerical Methods for Flows in Turbomachinery,VKI Lecture Series 1989–06, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [Hal87]
    K. C. Hall. A Linearized Euler Analysis of Unsteady Flows in Turbomachinery PhD thesis, M.I.T., 1987.Google Scholar
  8. [Ha189]
    K. C. Hall. Calculation of unsteady flows in turbomachines using the linearized Euler equations. AIAA Journal,27(6):777–787, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. [HC89]
    D. G. Holmes and S. D. Connell. Solution of the 2D NavierStokes equations on unstructured, adaptive grids. AIAA 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 891932-CP, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [He89]
    L. He. An Euler solver for unsteady flows around oscillating blades. ASME Paper 89-GT-279, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. [HLC88]
    D. G. Holmes, S. H Lamson, and S. D. Connell. Quasi-3D solutions for transonic, inviscid flows by adaptive triangulation. ASME Paper 88-GT-83, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. [JBW86]
    A. Jameson, T. J. Baker, and N. P. Weatherill. Calculation of inviscid transonic flow over a complete aircraft. AIAA paper 86–0103, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. [JST81]
    A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and E. Turkel. Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite-volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping scheme. AIAA paper 81–1259, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. [Lan59]
    L. M. Landau. Fluid Mechanics Pergamon Press, London, 1959.Google Scholar
  15. [LG91]
    D. R. Lindquist and M. B. Giles. On the validity of linearized unsteady Euler equations with shock capturing. AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 91–1598-CP, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. [MJM89]
    D. J. Mavripilis, A. Jameson, and L. Martinelli. Multigrid solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on triangular meshes. AIAA Paper AIAA-89–0120, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. [Ni74]
    R.-H. Ni. Non-Stationary Aerodynamics of Flat Plate Cascades in Compressible Flow PhD thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology, 1974.Google Scholar
  18. [NS75]
    IL-H. Ni and J. Sisto. Non-stationary aerodynamics of flat plate cascades in compressible flow. ASME Paper 75-GT-5, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. [Sid91]
    L. D. G. Siden. Numerical Simulation of Viscous Compressible Flows Applied to Turbomachinery Blade Flutter PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. [Ver77]
    J. M. Verdon. Further developments in the aerodynamic analysis of unsteady supersonic cascades, parts 1 & 2. ASME Paper 77GT-44 & 45, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Holmes
    • 1
  • H. A. Chuang
    • 2
  1. 1.Corporate Research and Development CenterGeneral Electric CompanySchenectadyUSA
  2. 2.General Electric Aircraft EnginesCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations