Informatics in Dental Education

  • John E. Eisner
Part of the Computers in Health Care book series (HI)

Abstract

This chapter begins with a general review of computer use in dental education. It is a short review, as the primary application of computers in dental school has been directed toward clinic management systems. Several other educational applications are also reviewed.

Keywords

Electronic Record Electronic Patient Record Medical Informatics Clinical Database Dental Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rulhman, D.C. and Lowe, J.R. Computer use in a dental clinic, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 32, No. 2: June 1968; p. 204–214.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennet, C.G. Dental school applicants record-keeping system, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 53, No. 2: February 1989; p. 152.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finkelstein, M.W., Johnson, L.A., and Lilly, G.E., Interactive videodisc patient simulations of oral disease, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4: April 1988; p. 217–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White, S. ORAD, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 53, No. 12: October 1989; p. 599–600.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lefebvre, C.A., Richardson, G.B., and Taylor, R.L., Computer-assisted removable partial denture design, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 54, No. 1: January, 1990; p. 46.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Micromedx, Nutriplan professional, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4: December 1989; p. 738–739.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spohn, E. and Hardison, J. D., Consortium on multi-media information technology to enrich dentistry-COMMITTED, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 54, No. 10: October, 1990; p. 597–598.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisner, J., The developing electronic curriculum consortium, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 54: October 1990; p. 598–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckenham S., Sellers, E.M., and Rothman, A.I., An application of computers to curriculum review and planning, Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 61, No. 1: January, 1986; p. 41–45.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dimge, S.S. and O’Connell, M.T., Cataloging a medical curriculum using MeSH keywords, Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1988; p. 332–336.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Personal correspondence from the curriculum coordinators at Emory, Loma Linda, UCLA, and West Virginia dental schools confirm the development of rudimentary curriculum databases in the mid 1980s.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Physicians for the twenty-first century, Report of the Project Panel on the General Professional Education of the Physician and College Preparation for Medicine, Association of American Medical Colleges, printed as a supplement to the Journal of Medical Education, November 1984; Part 2, p. 155–159.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. (1986). Medical Education in the Information Age. Proceedings of the Symposium on Medical Informatics.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salley, J.J., et al, Dental informatics: Strategic issues for the dental profession, in Vol. 39, Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 105.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaffe, C.C., Lynch, P.J. (1989). Hypermedia for education in the life sciences. Academic Computing; 10–13, 52–57, 73.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shortliffe, E.H. and Perreault, L.E., Medical informatics: Computer applications in health care, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass., 1990; 715.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flexner, A., Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4. Boston, Massachusetts: Updyke, 1910.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gies, W.J. (1926). Dental education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: the Carnegie Foundation, Bulletin No. 19.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The University of Florida adopted a modular curriculum design in the early 70’s, while the University of Texas, at both Houston and San Antonio, adopted a more individualized, media-driven approach to curricula in the late 70’s.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neufeld, V.R. and Barrows, H.S., The “McMaster Philosophy”: An Approach to medical education. Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 49: 1040–1050.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tosteson, D.C., New pathways in general medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 4, (1990) 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    SimpleSoftTm produced by Avanti Systems, Cherry Hill, N.J. and ZannyTm, produced by UDAC, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    This symposium was held on April 20/21,1990 in Alexandria, Virginia and sponsored jointly by the University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine and the American Association of Dental Schools. A number of papers from the Symposium have been published and can be found in the April, 1991 issue of the Journal of Dental Education.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Not integrated with or connected to the dentist’s practice management software.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A combination of the patient chart, photographs, models, and specialist reports collected for easy review by a student who must prepare a treatment plan or solve an immediate or emergency problem. This can now be accomplished quite successfully using a computer.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    The use of “trained” patients who simulate all the symptoms and characteristics of a specific disease, in a reliable fashion, so that a series of students can sequentially examine and interview them with the assurance that consistent responses will be provided.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hypertext refers to the non-linear organization of text information characterized by multiple layers and linkages within and between isolated text. Hypermedia escalates this definition of hypertext to include on-screen access to still images, motion video, animation and sound, usually through a “point and click” interface. The “electronic curriculum” described in this paper is a hypermedia application.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eisner, J.E., The future of dental education in an age of information technology, Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 67 (Special Issue, 1988 ), p. 103.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eisner, J.E., Dental bridges: Electronic and curricular, Minds in Motion, A Publication of York University Press and Apple Canada, Inc., Spring 1989, p. 15–18.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    World Health Organization, Prevention Methods and Programmes for Oral Diseases, WHO TRS 713 (1984) & Alternate Systems of Oral Care Delivery, WHO TRS 750 (1987).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Monteith, B.D., Nosology: A critical link between computers and dental education, practice, and research, in this volume, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gabrieli, E.R., A new electronic medical nomenclature, Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 13, No. 6: 1989; p. 355–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reed, M.J., A view from the field: Substantial curriculum reform, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 54, No. 9: September 1990; p. 560–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tedesco, L.A., Responding to educational challenges with problem-based learning and information technology, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 54, No. 9: September 1990; p. 544–547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dichter, M.S., Greenes, R.A., and Bergeron, B.P. The clinical problem-solving exercise: An orthogonal approach to organizing medical knowledge, Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1990, p. 473–477.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parwat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 59, 1–42.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Glaser, R. (1990). The re-emergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45; 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Norman, G.R. (1988). Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Medical Education, 22; 279–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Waterman, R.E., Duban, S.L., Mennin, S.P., & Kaufman, A. (1988). Clinical problem-based learning. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heiman, M. & Slomianko, J. (1988). Methods of inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Learning to Learn, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patient Simulator II, medical simulations developed and marketed by Knowledge House, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Finkelstein, M.W., Johnson, L.A., and Lilly, G.E., Interactive videodisc patient simulations of oral disease, Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4: April 1988; p. 217–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stevens, R.H., Kwak, A.R., and McCoy, J.M., Mapping student search paths through immunology problems by computer-based testing, Proceedings of the 14thSymposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1990; p. 488–492.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Eisner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations