Advertisement

Methods for Removing Spatial Variability from Field Research Trials

  • D. J. Mulla
  • A. U. Bhatti
  • R. Kunkel
Part of the Advances in Soil Science book series (SOIL, volume 13)

Abstract

Agronomists and soil scientists concerned with producing food and fiber or improving national food security conduct thousands of field experiments annually to determine which crop varieties, fertilizer rates, or management techniques will optimize crop yield. Because treatment differences in these experiments are often statistically not significant (Trangmar et al., 1987), making recommendations to growers is difficult or impossible.

Keywords

Correlate Error Russet Burbank Potato Yield Trend Adjacent Plot Soil Variability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, A.C. 1969. The use of residuals as a concomitant variable. BiometrikaGoogle Scholar
  2. 56(1):33–41.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, M.S. 1978. Nearest-neighbor models in the analysis of field experiments. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 40(2): 147–174.Google Scholar
  4. Besag, J., and R. Kempton. 1986. Statistical analysis of field experiments using neighboring plots. Biometrics 42:231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, J.C. 1986. Statistics-and Data Analysis in Geology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, G.H. 1979. Some two-dimensional designs balanced for nearest-neighbors. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 41(1):88–95.Google Scholar
  7. Green, P.J. 1985. Linear models for field trials, smoothing and cross-validation. Biometrika 72(3):527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, P.J., C. Jennison, and A. Seheult. 1985. Analysis of field experiments by least squares smoothing. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 47(2):299–315.Google Scholar
  9. Myers, J.L. 1966. Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Papadakis, J.S. 1937. Methode statistique pour des experiences sur champ. Bull. Inst. Amel. Plantes a Salonique No. 23.Google Scholar
  11. Trangmar, B.B., R.S. Yost, M.K. Wade, G. Uehara, and M. Sudjadi. 1987. Spatial variation of soil properties and rice yield on recently cleared land. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51(3):668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwarzbach, E. 1984. A new approach in the evaluation of field trials: The determination of the most likely genetic ranking of varieties. Votr. Pflanzenzuchtung 6:249–259, Proc. Eucarpia Cereal Section Meeting, Weihenstephan.Google Scholar
  13. Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A biometrical approach, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Eckert, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983. Nearest neighbor (NN) analysis of field experiments. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 45(2): 151–211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Mulla
  • A. U. Bhatti
  • R. Kunkel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations