Advertisement

Sunscreen: Prevention of Aging and Skin Cancer

  • Darrell S. Rigel

Abstract

The sun provides energy for all living things on Earth. Yet along with these beneficial effects are significant negative events that may result from excessive sun exposure.

Keywords

Skin Cancer Allergic Contact Dermatitis Stearyl Alcohol Isopropyl Myristate Glyceryl Monostearate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Friedman RJ, Rigel DS, Kopf AW, et al. Malignant melanoma in the 1990s: the continued importance of early detection and the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA 1991, 41:201–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koh H, et al. MMWR, CDC Atlanta, February 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Donoghue MN. Sunscreen: one weapon against melanoma. Dermatol Clin. 1991; 9:789–793.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willis I. Sensitization potential of para-aminobenzoic acid. Cosmet Toilet. 1976; 91:63.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI. Contact sensitization and photocontact sensitization of sun-screening agents. In: Sunscreens: Development, Evaluation and Regulatory Aspects, NJ Lowe, NA Shaath, eds. Marcel Derker, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wennerstein G, Thone P, Broathagen H, et al. The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study: preliminary results. Contact Dermatit. 1984; 10:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruze M, Fregert S, Gruvberger B. Occurence of para-aminobenzoic acid and benzocaine as contaminants in sunscreen agents. Photodermatology. 1988; 5:162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dromgoogle SH, Maibach HI. Sunscreening agent intolerance: contact and photocontact sensitization and contact urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:1068–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gange RW, Sproker A, Matzinger E, et al. Efficacy of a sunscreen containing butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane against ultraviolet A radiation in photosensitized subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986; 15:494–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberts DL. Contact allergy to Eusolex 8021. Contact Dermatit. 1989; 20:74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaidbey K, Gange, RW. Comparison of methods for assessing photoprotection against ultraviolet A in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987; 16:346–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor CR, Stern RS, Leyden JJ, et al. Photoaging/photodamage and photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leroy C, Dompmartin A. Sunscreen substantivity: comparison between water and sweat resistance tests. Photodermatolrogy. 1988; 5:49–50.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cesarini JP, Chardon A, Binet O, et al. High-protection sunscreen formulation prevents UVB-induced sunburn cell formulation. Photodermatology. 1989; 6:20–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaidbey KH. The photoprotection potential of the new superpotent sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:449–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mills OH, Kligman AM. Comedogenicity of sunscreens. Arch Dermatol. 1982; 118:417–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurish MF, Robert LK, Kruegen GC, et al. The effects of various sunscreen agents on skin damage and their induction of tumor susceptability in mice subjected to ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1981; 76:246–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knobler E, Almeida L, Ruzkowski AM, et al. Photoallergy to benzophenone. Arch Dermatol. 1989; 125:801–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darrell S. Rigel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations