Non-Medical Issues Presented by the Pregnant Worker
Abstract
Several years ago, I was privileged to serve as chairman of a small group of extraordinarily knowledgable and hardworking occupational physicians and obstetricians who were concerned about the health of the pregnant worker and the child she was bearing. We were helped by a dedicated staff provided by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AGOG), financial support from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the generous contributions of two expert panels: one of clinicians and scientists from all of the relevant fields and disciplines; and the other of people who could reflect the views of labor, management, the women’s movement, the law and other groups with vested interests in this problem. Quite arbitrarily, we decided to limit our focus to the period of pregnancy and delivery and our concern to the purely clinical aspects of the potential impact of work and the work environment on the health of the worker and her fetus and the outcome of her pregnancy. For more than a year, we studied and discussed the latest scientific information and the best current practices in obstetrics and occupational medicine and, finally, produced the report, “Guidelines on Pregnancy and Work,” that was published by ACOG in 1977 and subsequently reprinted by NIOSH.1
Keywords
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Good Current Practice Parental Insurance Occupational Health Professional Unreasonable RiskPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Guidelines on Pregnancy and Work. Chicago: AGOG Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
- 2.Claxton, L. D. and Barry, P. Z. Chemical mutagenesis: An emerging issue for public health. Am J Public Health 67: 1037–1042, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Human Health and the Environment—Some Research Needs. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 77–1277, 1977, 317 ff.Google Scholar
- 4.Messite, J. and Bond, M.: Consideration for women at work, in Occupational Medicine—Principles and Practical Applications. Vol 2. C. Zenz (Ed.). Year Book Publishers, in press.Google Scholar
- 5.Longo, L. D.: The biologic effects of carbon monoxide on the pregnant woman, fetus and newborn infant. Am I Obstet Gynecol. 129: 69–103, 1977.Google Scholar
- 6.Swartz, H. M. and Reichling, B. A.: Hazards of radiation exposure for pregnant women. JAMA 239: 1907–1908, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Simon v. Mullin, 380 A.2d 1353 (Conn. Super. Ct., Nov. 2, 1977 ).Google Scholar
- 8.Renslow v. Mennonite Hospital, 367 N.E. 2d 1250 (Ill. Sup. Ct., Aug. 8, 1977; rehearing denied Oct. 3, 1977 ).Google Scholar
- 9.Blum, J. D.: Revealing the invisible tort: The employer’s duty to warn, in Health Services and Health Hazards: The Employee’s Need to Know. R. H. Egdahl and D. C. Walsh ( Eds. ), Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp. 173–181.Google Scholar