Implications of a Country Work Force’s Perceptions of Occupations on Work Force Mix and Macro Manpower Plans

  • Arun K. Jain
  • Vijay Mahajan
  • Brian T. Ratchford
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 7)

Abstract

Using data obtained from a mail panel of households, this paper examines subject’s perceptions of different occupations, and studies the relationship between these perceptions and preferences for occupations. Perceptions can be summarized into two dimensions, the personal satisfaction associated with the occupation, and the occupation’s orientation toward people. The respondent’s most preferred occupation for a son is found to be closely related to these dimensions, but the most preferred occupation for a daughter is found to be more closely related to the percentage of women already in the occupation. The findings suggest certain serious implications on work force mix and macro manpower planning.

Keywords

Occupational Choice Personal Satisfaction Occupational Prestige Prefer Occupation High Status Occupation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duncan, Otis Dudley. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations”, in Albert J. Reiss, Jr., et al., eds., Occupations and Social Status. New York: Free Press, 1961Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gusfield, Joseph R. and Michael Schwartz. “The Meaning of Occupational Prestige: Reconsideration of the W. O. P. R. C. Scale”, American Sociological Review, 28 (April 1963), 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, S. C. “Hierarchical Clustering Schemes,” Psychometrica, 32 (1967), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robinson, John P., Robert Athanasions and Kendra P. Head. Measures of Occupational Attitudes and Occupational Characteristics. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thielbar, Gerald and Saul P. Feldman. “Occupational Stereotypes and Prestieg,” Social Forces, 48 (September 1969), 64–72.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. S. Bureau of The Census. Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status. Washington, D. C.: Working Paper No. 15, U. S. Bureau of The Census, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arun K. Jain
    • 1
  • Vijay Mahajan
    • 1
  • Brian T. Ratchford
    • 1
  1. 1.State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations