Pion Production on Nuclei

  • A. Reitan
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 15)

Abstract

To characterize the experimental situation on π production on complex nuclei in a few words, one might say that while more experiments certainly are needed if one wishes to understand the details of the reaction mechanism, the quality of the experiments is better and the number of cases studied larger than in some other important areas of pion-nuclear physics. This has, above all, come about through the efforts of the Uppsala [1–3] group, that has studied (P,π+) and (p,π) reactions on a number of targets (9Be, 10B, 12C, 13C, 16O, 28Si and 40Ca for π+, 9Be and 13C for π) at 185 MeV incident proton energy. What makes these experiments so important is first of all the fact that the angular distributions have been measured, with rather high accuracy (at least in the π+ case); furthermore, it has been possible to separate the cross sections leading to the various states of the final nucleus, as long as these states are not too closely spaced. Generally speaking, the results of these experiments are that a) the cross section for π+ production is much larger and shows more variation with angle than that for π production, and that b) the angular distribution and absolute cross section is very noticeably dependent on which final nuclear state is reached in the reaction.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Differential Cross Section Optical Potential Pion Production Pion Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Dahlgren, B. Höistad and P. Grafström, Phys. Lett. 35B (1971) 219.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Dahlgren, P. Grafström, B. Höistad and A. Åsberg, Nucl. Phys. A204 (1973) 53; Phys. Lett. 47B (1973) 439; Nucl. Phys. A211 (1973) 243; Nucl. Phys. A227 (1974) 245.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Dahlgren and P. Grafström, Physica Scripta 10 (1974) 104.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.J. Domingo, B.W. Allardyce, C.H.Q. Ingram, S. Rohlin, N.W. Tanner, J. Rohlin, E.M. Rimmer, G. Jones and J.P. Girardeau-Montaut, Phys. Lett. 32B (1970) 309.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Gabathuler, J. Rohlin, J.J. Domingo, C.H.Q. Ingram, S. Rohlin and N.W. Tanner, Nucl. Phys. B40 (1972) 32.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Rohlin, K. Gabathuler, N.W. Tanner, C.R. Cox and J.J. Domingo, Phys. Lett. 40B (1972) 539.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Le Bornec, B. Tatischeff, L. Bimbot, I. Brissaud, J.P. Garron, H.D. Holmgren, F. Reide and N. Willis, Phys. Lett. 49B (1974) 434; University of Maryland Annual Report (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D.R.F. Cochran, P.N. Dean, P.A.M. Gram, E.A. Knapp, E.R. Martin, D.E. Nagle, R.B. Perkins, W.J. Shlaer, H.A. Thiessen and E.D. Theriot, Phys. Rev. D6 (1972) 3085.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. Dollhopf, C. Lunke, C.F. Perdrisat, W.K. Roberts, P. Kitching, W.C. Olsen and J.R. Priest, Nucl. Phys. A217 (1973) 381.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Amato, R.L. Burman, R. Macek, J. Oostens, W. Shlaer, E. Arthur, S. Sobottka and W.C. Lam, Phys. Rev. C9 (1974) 501.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    N.S. Wall, J.N. Craig, R.E. Berg, D. Ezrow and H.D. Holmgren, Proc. Fifth int. conf. on high-energy physics and nuclear structure (Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, 1974), p. 279.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    P.U. Renberg, D.F. Measday, M. Pepin, P. Schwaller, B. Favier and C. Richard-Serre, Nucl. Phys. A183 (1972) 81.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    G.A. Miller, Nucl. Phys. A224 (1974) 269.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Il-T. Cheon, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. Extra No. (1968) 146.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M.V. Barnhill, Nucl. Phys. A131 (1969) 106.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Reitan, Nucl. Phys. B29 (1971) 525.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. LeTourneux and J.M. Eisenberg, Nucl. Phys. 87 (1966) 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    W.B. Jones and J.M. Eisenberg, Nucl. Phys. A154 (1970) 49.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J.M. Eisenberg, R. Guy, J.V. Noble and H.J. Weber, Phys. Lett. 45B (1973) 93.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M.P. Keating and J.G. Wills, Phys. Rev. C7 (1973) 1336.ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    E. Rost and P.D. Kunz, Phys. Lett. 43B (1973) 17.ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    B. Höistad, S. Dahlgren, P. Grafström and A. Åsberg, Physica Scripta 9 (1974) 201.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G.A. Miller and S.C. Phatak, Phys. Lett. 51B (1974) 129.ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    I.S. Shapiro, in Proc. Int. School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” Course 38 (Academic Press, London, 1967).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    N. Austern, Direct nuclear reaction theories (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    S.T. Butler, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A208 (1951) 559.ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. Reitan, Nucl. Phys. A237 (1975) 465.ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    I.R. Afnan and A.W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C10 (1974) 109.ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    C.H.Q. Ingram, N.W. Tanner and J.J. Domingo, Nucl. Phys. B31 (1971) 331.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    H.W. Fearing, Phys. Lett. 52B (1974) 407; Phys. Rev. C11 (1975) 1210; Phys. Rev. C11 (1975) 1493; Univ. of Alberta preprint UAE-NPL-1072.ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    A. Reitan, Nucl. Phys. B50 (1972) 166.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M.P. Locher and H.J. Weber, Nucl. Phys. B76 (1974) 400.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    G.W. Barry, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1441.ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    V.S. Bhasin and I.M. Duck, Phys. Lett. 46B (1973) 309.ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    B.R. Wienke, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 1220.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Z. Grossman, F. Lenz and M.P. Locher, Ann. Phys. 84 (1974) 348.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Dillig, H.M. Hofmann and M.G. Huber, Phys. Lett. 44B (1973) 484.ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    M. Dillig and M.G. Huber, Nuovo Cim. Lett. 11 (1974) 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Reitan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TrondheimTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations