Theory of Time-Dependent Spectral Observations in Qed and Quantum Optics

  • J. H. Eberly
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 110)

Abstract

The subject of measurement in quantum theory is more than 50 years old, and there are well-known controversies regarding hidden variables that are still lively today. The subject of spectra is twice as old, but not as well known. It is also the center of recent activity. In these lectures I will deal only with the older subject.

Keywords

Spectral Intensity Physical Spectrum Side Peak Stationary Random Process Transient Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See, for example, N. Wiener’s summary in his classic paper: Acta Math. 55, 117 (1930).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Observations that do not imply normal ordering are discussed in I.C. Khoo and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 14, 2174 (1976) and 18, 2184 (1978). Earlier references are also given.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, London), Fifth Edition, Sec. 7.6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    It was first discussed in J.H. Eberly and K. Wódkiewicz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1252 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See Ref. 4 for many references to early attempts to define time-dependent spectra.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Experiments along these lines have been proposed recently: D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Letters 47, 233 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    See, for example, the discussions given by Kleppner in Ref.7, and by H. Walther elsewhere in this volume, and by S. Haroche in Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 1175 (1983). Earlier references are also given in these papers.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.T. Jaynes, Microwave Laboratory Report 502, Stanford University, 1958 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.T. Jaynes and F.W. Cummings, Proc. I.E.E.E. 51, 89 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    For recent work, and many earlier references, see N.B. Narozhny, J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 23, 236 (1981).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.R. Ackerhalt, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester 1974 (unpublished). See also J.R. Ackerhalt and K. Rzazewski, Phys. Rev. A 12, 2549 (1975), Sec. IV.D.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon, N.B. Narozhny, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 550 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon and J.H. Eberly (unpublished)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. 188, 1969 (1969)Google Scholar
  16. F. Schuda, C.R. Stroud, Jr., and M. Hercher, J. Phys. B 7, L198 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    References to experimental work, and an approximate theoretical discussion which uses an approach similar to that of the physical spectrum, have been given by E. Courtens and A. Szöke, Phys. Rev. A 15, 1588 (1977), and 17, 2119 (1978).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    J.H. Eberly, C.V. Kunasz, and K. Wódkiewicz, J. Phys. B 13, 217 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    X.Y. Huang, R. Tanaś, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 26, 892 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Eberly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations