Quantum Electrodynamics and Quantum Optics pp 209-227 | Cite as
Theory of Time-Dependent Spectral Observations in Qed and Quantum Optics
Chapter
Abstract
The subject of measurement in quantum theory is more than 50 years old, and there are well-known controversies regarding hidden variables that are still lively today. The subject of spectra is twice as old, but not as well known. It is also the center of recent activity. In these lectures I will deal only with the older subject.
Keywords
Spectral Intensity Physical Spectrum Side Peak Stationary Random Process Transient Spectrum
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.See, for example, N. Wiener’s summary in his classic paper: Acta Math. 55, 117 (1930).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Observations that do not imply normal ordering are discussed in I.C. Khoo and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 14, 2174 (1976) and 18, 2184 (1978). Earlier references are also given.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.See, for example, M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, London), Fifth Edition, Sec. 7.6.Google Scholar
- 4.It was first discussed in J.H. Eberly and K. Wódkiewicz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1252 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.See Ref. 4 for many references to early attempts to define time-dependent spectra.Google Scholar
- 6.E.M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Experiments along these lines have been proposed recently: D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Letters 47, 233 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.See, for example, the discussions given by Kleppner in Ref.7, and by H. Walther elsewhere in this volume, and by S. Haroche in Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 1175 (1983). Earlier references are also given in these papers.Google Scholar
- 9.E.T. Jaynes, Microwave Laboratory Report 502, Stanford University, 1958 (unpublished).Google Scholar
- 10.E.T. Jaynes and F.W. Cummings, Proc. I.E.E.E. 51, 89 (1963).Google Scholar
- 11.For recent work, and many earlier references, see N.B. Narozhny, J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 23, 236 (1981).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J.R. Ackerhalt, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester 1974 (unpublished). See also J.R. Ackerhalt and K. Rzazewski, Phys. Rev. A 12, 2549 (1975), Sec. IV.D.Google Scholar
- 13.J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon, N.B. Narozhny, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 550 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon and J.H. Eberly (unpublished)Google Scholar
- 15.B.R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. 188, 1969 (1969)Google Scholar
- F. Schuda, C.R. Stroud, Jr., and M. Hercher, J. Phys. B 7, L198 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.References to experimental work, and an approximate theoretical discussion which uses an approach similar to that of the physical spectrum, have been given by E. Courtens and A. Szöke, Phys. Rev. A 15, 1588 (1977), and 17, 2119 (1978).Google Scholar
- 17.J.H. Eberly, C.V. Kunasz, and K. Wódkiewicz, J. Phys. B 13, 217 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.X.Y. Huang, R. Tanaś, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 26, 892 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Press, New York 1984