Advertisement

Functional Differences Associated with Quantitative Distribution of Ia Antigens on Mouse B Cells

  • E. M. Andrew
  • N. M. Mackenzie
  • R. M. E. Parkhouse

Abstract

Cellular interaction, the sine qua non of the immune system, is based on ligand-receptor systems expressed on the surface of the interacting cell types. Our understanding of the cellular functioning of the immune system has been made possible largely through the use of antibodies to surface molecules which are selectively expressed on subpopulations of lymphocytes at different stages of their development. In many studies the emphasis has been on the association of cell function with the presence or absence of a particular surface marker1–3. In other words, the function of the cell has been correlated with operationally qualitative differences in marker expression.

Keywords

Secondary Response Staining Reagent Unmodulated Cell Interact Cell Type Adoptive Transfer System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Subbarao, D.E. Mosier, A. Ahmed, J.J. Mond, I. Scher and W.E. Paul, Role of a nonimmunoglobulin cell surface determinant in the activation of B lymphocytes by thymus- independent antigens, J. Exp. Med. 149: 495 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Marshall-Clarke, A. Chayen and R.M.E. Parkhouse, Monoclonal antibody NIM-R2 shows differential reactivity with virgin and memory B cells, Eur. J. Immunol. 12: 733 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Hayakawa, R.R. Hardy, M. Honda, L.A. Herzenberg, A.D. Steinberg and L.A. Herzenberg, Ly-1 B cells: Functionally distinct lymphocytes that secrete IgM autoantibodies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81: 2494 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Hood, M. Steinmetz and B. Malissen, Genes of the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1: 529 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. A. Nagy, C. N. Baxevanis, N. Ishii and J. Klein, la antigens as restriction molecules in Ir-gene controlled T-cell proliferation, Immunol. Rev. 60: 59 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. L. Greenstein, E. M. Lord, P. Horan, J. W. Kappler and P. Marrack, Functional subsets of B cells defined by quantitative differences in surface I-A, J. Immunol. 126: 2419 (1981)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Bottomly, B. Jones, J. Kaye and F. Jones, Subpopulations of B cells distinguished by cell surface expression of la antigens. Correlation of la and idiotype during activation by cloned la-restricted T cells, J. Exp. Med. 158: 265 (1983)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Coutinho, L. Forni and B. Blomberg, Shared antigenic determinants by mitogen receptors and antibody molecules to the same thymus-independent antigen, J. Exp. Med. 148: 862 (1978)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. M. Andrew
    • 1
  • N. M. Mackenzie
    • 1
  • R. M. E. Parkhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Medical ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations