Surface Emission and Biological Probes for Inorganic Interfaces

  • J. E. Davies
  • R. P. Hurst
  • N. T. Spooner

Abstract

Inorganic materials provide solid substrata with which cells may interact in numerous natural, pathological and iatrogenic conditions. Human natural hard tissues, except dental enamel,depend upon populations of specialised cells for maintenance of their vitality and are therefore continually interactive. However, in-organic substrata may also be introduced into the body in a range of mineral dust diseases and as surgical replacements for natural tissues. The interactions of cells with materials in these last two groups may be considered to depend upon three criteria: (i) the surface physico-chemical properties of the substratum, (ii) the composition of the extracellular environment and (iii) the properties of cell membranes Each of these criteria embrace numerous aspects of the structure, composition and behaviour of the individual components which combine to create an interface in the biological environment. However, we believe that surface charge phenomena associated with both the in-organic substratum and the cell membrane will be of critical import-ance in interfacial behaviour.

Keywords

Auger Electron Spectroscopy Optically Stimulate Luminescence Parietal Bone Calcium Phosphate Ceramic Femoral Lymph Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Ludloff, Untersuchungen über den Galvanotropismus, Pfluger, Arch. Physiol. 59: 524–554 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Locomotion of Tissue Cells”. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    see General Discussion I in Ref. (2).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.L. Hench & E.C. Ethridge, “Biomaterials” an interfacial approach”, Academic Press, New York (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.R. Morrison, “Electrochemistry at Semiconductor and Oxidized Metal Electrodes”, Plenum Press, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z.A. Munir & J.P. Hirth, The nature and Role of Surface charge in Ceramics in: “Surfaces and Interfaces in ceramic and ceramic-metal systems”, Materials Science Research 14, ed, J. Pask & A. Evans, Plenum Press, New York (1981).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.R. Evans, “An introduction to Metallic Corrosion” 3rd Ed. Edward Arnold, London (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.C. Lowrison, Fundamentals of the Breakdown of Solids, Chapter 6 in: “Dispersion of powders in Liquids”, G.D. Parfitt, ed, Applied Sci. Pub., London (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.E. Davies, Surface dependent emission of low energy electrons (exoemission) from apatite samples in: “Adsorption on and Surface Chemistry of Hydroxyapatite”, D.N. Mistral, ed, Plenum Press, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.A. Larson, T.A. Oda, P. Braunlich & J.T. Dickinson, Emission of CI atoms from NaCl during Vk-centre decomposition, Solid State Communications 32: 347–351 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Glaefeke, Exoelectron emission, Chapter 5 in: “Thermally Stimulated Relaxation in solids”, P. Braunlich ed, Topics in Applied Physics 37, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I.V. Krylova, The chemical aspect of exoemission, Russian Chemical Reviews. Trans, from Uspekhi Khimii 45: 2138–2167 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.E. Davies, Biological Applications of charge-carrier emission spectroscopy, in: Proc. 8th Polish Seminar on “Exoelectron emission and Related Phenomena”, In Press: Acta. Univ. Wrat. - Mat. Fyz. Astrn.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.E. Davies & P. Ramsay, A microcomputer-controlled apparatus for simultaneous measurement of exoelectron emission and thermoluminescence, Radiation Prot. Dos. 4: 177–180 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.W. Price, The relationship between endemic elephantiasis of the lower legs and the local soils and climate, Trop. Geogr. Med. 26: 225–230 (1974).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E.W. Price, Endemic elephantiasis of the lower legs in Rwanda and Burundi, Trop. Geogr. Med. 28: 283–290 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E.W. Price, W.J. McHardy & F.D. Pooley, Endemic elephantiasis of the lower legs as a health hazard of barefooted agriculturalists in Cameroon, West Africa. Ann. Occ. Hyg. 24: 1–8 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.H. Blanke, E.W. Price, H.M. Rendell, J. Terry, P.D. Townsend & A.G. Wintle, Correlations between elephantiasis and thermoluminescence of volcanic soil, Radiation Effects 73: 103–113 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.E. Davies & P.D. Townsend, Exoemission of Ethiopian soils and the endemicity of non-filarial elephantiasis, Radiation Prot. Dosimetry 4: 185–188 (1983).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N.T. Spooner & J.E. Davies, The possible role of soil particles in the aetiology of non-filarial elephantiasis: a macrophage cytotoxicity assay, In Press: Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. & Hyg.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.E. Davies & N.T. Spooner, Dose dependence of soil dust cytotoxicity to macrophages, In preparation.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Jarcho, Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics, Clin. Orth, and Relat. Research 157: 259–278 (1981).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.E. Clarke, L.L. Hench and H.A. Paschall, The influence of surface chemistry on implant interface histology: A theo-retical basis for implant materials selection, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10: 161–174 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.P.A.T. Klein, A.A. Driessen & K. de Groot, Relationship between the degradation behaviour of calcium phosphate ceramics and their physical-chemical characterisation and ultrastructural geometry, Biomaterials. 5: 157–160 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S.J. Jones & A. Boyde, The migration of osteoblasts, Cell Tiss. Res. 184: 179–193 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N.A. Barnicot, The supravital staining of osteoclasts with neutral red, their distribution on the parietal bone of normal growing mice and a comparison with the mutants grey-lethal and hydrocephalus-3, Proc. Roy. Soc. (Lond) 134: 467–485 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.J. Jones & A. Boyde, Colonization of various natural substrates by osteoblasts in-vitro, Scanning Elect. Microscopy 1979/ii: 529-538 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Davies
    • 1
  • R. P. Hurst
    • 1
  • N. T. Spooner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations