Applied Linguistics as Linguistics Applied

  • Ranko Bugarski
Part of the Topics in Language and Linguistics book series (TLLI)


In a paper presented at the AILA congress in Montreal in 1978, I examined the notion of applied linguistics, reaching the following conclusions. In discussing the nature and status of applied linguistics, it is essential to distinguish between two levels, the pragmatic and the theoretical. Pragmatically, it is all right to talk of applied linguistics in the sense of a complex of various research activities of considerable social relevance, widely recognized and organized nationally and internationally, with its own associations, congresses, projects, publications, etc. Theoretically, however, the scope and content of the notion are open to dispute; indeed, on this level applied linguistics does not seem to exist as a distinct and coherent field of study. Few if any convincing criteria can be found which might justify the separation of “applied linguistics” from “linguistics” in terms of either subject matter or methodology, the study of language as a whole having of late become increasingly interdisciplinary and socially conscious. A distinction may perhaps be drawn only in terms of goals, the general aim of linguistics being to understand human language, and that of applied linguistics, to contribute to the solution of problems arising in the use of language in human societies—though even this appears questionable in light of contemporary developments. Applied linguistics is hence best regarded not as a branch of linguistics or a conglomeration of disciplines, still less as a set of practical problems, but rather as an external orientation within the study of language—that is, as the name of a motivation, not of a separate field of investigation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vols. 1–3 (1980–1982). Ed. Robert B. Kaplan. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  2. Anttila, Raimo.An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics.New York: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Anttila, Raimo. “Linguistik und Philologie.” InLinguistik und Nachbarwissenschaften.Eds. Renate Bartsch and Theo Vennemann. Kronberg/Taunus: Scriptor Verlag, 1973, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar
  4. Bartsch, Renate and Vennemann, Theo. “Linguistik.” InLinguistik und Nachbarwissenschaften. Eds. Renate Bartsch and Theo Vennemann.Kronberg/Taunus: Scriptor Verlag, 1973, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
  5. Bugarski, Ranko. “A Plea for Integration in Linguistics.” Paper prepared for the symposium “Dilemmas of Focus in Linguistics.” New York, Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. Bugarski, Ranko. “Reflections on the Goals of Linguistics.”Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists.Ed. Wolfgang U. Dressier and Wolfgang Meid. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 1978, pp. 249–252.Google Scholar
  7. Bugarski, Ranko. “Some Thoughts on the Structure and Applications of Linguistics.” InModels of Grammar, Descriptive Linguistics and Pedagogical Grammar,Papers from the 5th International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Montreal 1978. Ed. Gerhard Nickel and Dietrich Nehls. Heidelberg: Julius Groos, 1980, pp. 22–45.Google Scholar
  8. Corder, S. Pit.Introducing Applied Linguistics.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Courchêne, Robert. “The History of the Term ‘Applied’ in Applied Linguistics.” InActes du 5e Congrès de lAILA,Ed. Jean-Guy Savard and Lorne Laforge. Québec: Les Presses de 1’Université Laval, 1981, pp. 66–88.Google Scholar
  10. Crystal, David. “Linguistic Research in Great Britain in Relation to the Social Sciences.”Sociolin- guistics Newsletter4:2 (1973), 14.Google Scholar
  11. Crystal, David.Directions in Applied Linguistics.London/New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, Joshua A. (Ed.).Advances in the Sociology of Language,vol. 1. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Hymes, Dell. “Speech and Language: On the Origins and Foundations of Inequality Among Speakers.”InLanguage as a Human Problem.Ed. Einar Haugen and Morton Bloomfield. Guildford/London: Lutterworth Press, 1975, pp. 45–71.Google Scholar
  14. Hymes, Dell.Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach.London: Tavistock, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. Jakobson, Roman. “Linguistics in its Relation to Other Sciences.” InActes du Xe Congrés International des Linguistes.Bucharest: Académie de la RSR, 1969, vol. I, pp. 75–111.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, Robert B. “Toward a Theory of Applied Linguistics.” InLinguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A.Hill.Ed. M. A. Jazayeryet al.The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 1979,vol. 4, pp. 319–332.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, Robert B. (Ed.).On the Scope of Applied Linguistics.Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Kühlwein, Wolfgang. “Angewandte Linguistik.” InLexikon der germanistischen Linguistik.2nd ed. Ed. Hans Peter Althauset al.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1980, Bd. 4, pp. 761–768. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kühlwein, Wolfgang. “Bausteine zur Theoriebildung der Angewandten Linguistik.”in AngewandteLinguistik: Positionen, Wege, Perspektiven.Eds. Wolfgang Kühlwein and Albert Raasch.Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1980, pp. 13–27. (b)Google Scholar
  20. Labov, William.Sociolinguistic Patterns.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Maher, J. Peter.Papers on Language Theory and History,vol. I:Creation and Tradition in Language.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1977.Google Scholar
  22. Malmberg, Bertil. “Applied Linguistics: Past, Present and Future.” InAILA 81 , Proceedings II:Lectures.Ed. Bengt Sigurd and Jan Svartvik. Lund: Gleerup (=Studia Linguistica35:1–2[1981], 7–14).Google Scholar
  23. Martinet, André. “The Unity of Linguistics.”Linguistics Today (= Word10:2–3 [1954], 121–125).Google Scholar
  24. Průcha, Jan. “Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistics-Separate or Integrated?”Linguistics89 ( =International Journal of Psycholinguistics1 [1972], 9–23).Google Scholar
  25. Shuy, Roger W. “The Decade Ahead for Applied Sociolinguistics.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language45 (1984), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. “Is a ‘Socio-psycholinguistics’ Necessary?”Linguistics112 (=International Journal of Psycholinguistics 2[1973], 93–104).Google Scholar
  27. Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. The Place of Applied Linguistics in the System of Sciences: AL in Relation to ‘Linguistics’ “,Revue Roumaine de Linguistique25:3 (1980), 153–160.Google Scholar
  28. Titone, Renzo.Psicolinguistica Applicata.Roma: Armando, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. Titone, Renzo. “Applied Psycholinguistics-Amphibian or Phantom?”Linguistics153 (=International Journal of Psycholinguistics4 [1975], 67–70).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranko Bugarski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations