Early postoperative intraperitoneal Adriamycin as an adjuvant treatment for visceral and retroperitoneal sarcoma
Visceral and retroperitoneal sarcoma represents an unsolved problem in oncology with a majority of patients going on to die of their disease despite an aggressive surgical approach. This cancer fails its surgical treatment both at systemic sites and within the abdominal cavity. Local recurrence rates are extremely high with retroperitoneal and pelvic sarcoma. Approximately 8 out of 10 patients who recur are shown to have local recurrence with the resection site involved in the recurrent malignant process . Also, a majority of the patients who recur have peritoneal seeding (Sarcomatosis) in addition to the resection site recurrence . These local recurrences are more commonly seen in patients with retroperitoneal and pelvic sarcomas as opposed to visceral sarcoma. Peritoneal seeding plus liver metastases are the sites of treatment failure most commonly seen with visceral sarcoma.
KeywordsPeritoneal Carcinomatosis Early Postoperative Period Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Resection Site Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Sugarbaker TA, Chang D, Koslowe P, Sugarbaker PH. Patterns of spread of recurrent intraabdominal sarcoma. In Sugarbaker PH, ed. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Principles of management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, pp 65–77.Google Scholar
- 6.Chang AE, Rosenberg SA, Glatstein EJ, Antman KH. Sarcomas of soft tissues. In De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds Principles of Practice of Oncology, 3rd ed Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1989, p 1385.Google Scholar
- 8.Sugarbaker PH, Sweatman TW, Graves T, Cunliffe W, Israel M. Early postoperative intraperitoneal Adriamycin: Pharmacologic studies and a preliminary clinical report. Reg Cancer Treat 1991;4:127–171.Google Scholar
- 12.Chang BK. Tissue distribution of Adriamycin administered intraperitoneally vs. intravenously, with special emphasis on the pancreas. Bull Cancer (Paris) 1982;69:172–175.Google Scholar