Electroporation and Transgenic Plant Production
Electroporation is a well-established method for production of transgenic plants. Short high-voltage pulses can permeabilize the protoplast plasma membrane, facilitating uptake of plasmid DNA that can become expressed transiently and, eventually, be stably incorporated into the genome.
The major electrical parameters are field strength and pulse duration, which are inversely related and can be chosen within wide ranges (100–5000 V/cm and 0.01–100 msec). Stable transformation requires less rigorous electrical conditions than transient expression. Transient and stable transformation increase with plasmid DNA concentration, up to about 100 µg/mL; addition of carrier DNA lowers the amount of plasmid DNA required for transformation. Linearized plasmid DNA and heat shock enhance stable transformation. Addition of PEG stimulates transient expression and, in most cases, stable transformation. The transformation rate is also affected by protoplast size, pulse type, culture medium, and temperature.
Stable transformation frequencies are in the range 0.0001–0.1% of the electroporated protoplasts. Transgenic plants contain, on average, from one to three copies of the exogenous gene, and all copies are usually integrated into one site in the genome. The inserted plasmid DNA is often modified by rearrangement and ligation events, and the copy number does generally not correlate with expression level. Transgenic plants regenerated from electroporated protoplasts are most often fertile, and the exogenous genes appear to be inherited as a single dominant character in a Mendelian fashion.
Although the cell wall is generally regarded to be impermeable to DNA, some intact cells and tissues can be induced to take up DNA by electroporation.
KeywordsTransgenic Plant Transient Expression Transgenic Rice Plant Stable Transformation Transient Gene Expression
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chupeau, M.-C., Bellini, C., Guerche, P., Maisonneuve, B., Vastra, G., and Chupeau, Y. (1989). Transgenic plants of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) obtained through electroporation of protoplasts. Biol. Technol. 7: 503–508.Google Scholar
- Coster, H. G. L. (1968). The role of pH in the punch-through effect in the electrical characteristics of Chara australis. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22: 365–374.Google Scholar
- Joersbo, M. (1990). Methods for direct gene transfer into plant protoplasts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Joersbo, M., and Brunstedt, J. (1990b). Quantitative relationship between parameters of electroporation. J. Plant Physiol. 137: 169–174.Google Scholar
- Kirches, E., Frey, N., and Schnabl, H. (1991). Transient gene expression in sunflower mesophyll protoplasts. Bot. Acta 104: 212–216.Google Scholar
- Lurquin, P. F., and Paszty, C (1988). Electroporation of tobacco protoplasts with homologous and non-homologous transformation vectors. J. Plant Physiol. 133: 332–335.Google Scholar
- Saunders, J. A., Matthews, G. R, and Van Wert, S. L. (1992). Pollen electrotransformation for gene transfer in plants Pages 227–247. In Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. Chang, D. C., Chassy, B. M., Saunders, J. A., and Sowers, A. E. eds. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Seguin, A., and Lalonde, M. (1988). Gene transfer by electroporation in betulaceae protoplasts: Alnus incana. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 367–370.Google Scholar
- Tautorus, T. E., Bekkaoui, F., Pilon, M., Datla, R. S. S., Crosby, W. L., Fowke, L. C., and Dunstan, D. I. (1989). Factors affecting transient expression in electroporated black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) protoplasts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsukada, M., Kusano, T., Kitagawa, Y. (1989). Introduction of foreign genes into tomato protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Cell Physiol. 30: 599–603.Google Scholar
- Zhang, H. M., Yang, H., Rech, E. L., Golds, T. J., Davis, A. S., Mulligan, B. J., Cocking, E. C., and Davey, M. R. (1988). Transgenic rice plants produced by electroporation-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 379–384.Google Scholar