Awareness and Partitional Informational Structures

  • Salvatore Modica
  • Aldo Rustichini
Part of the Theory and Decision Library book series (TDLC, volume 20)

Abstract

We begin with an example to motivate the introduction of the concept of unawareness in models of information. There are a subject and two possible states of the world, σ and τ. At σ a certain fact p happens — it is true — and the subject sees it or hears it or anyhow perceives it, so that he knows it is true (in Geanakoplos [5] the subject is Sherlock Holmes’ assistant and fact p is ‘the dog barks’). At state τ fact p does not occur (it is false), and the subject not only does not see it or hear it etc.; but what is more, he does not even think of the possibility that it might: fact p is not present to the subject’s mind. What is an appropriate formal model for this story?

Keywords

Modal Logic Inference Rule Canonical Model Epistemic Logic Atomic Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Aumann, R. A.: 1976, ‘Agreeing to Disagree’, The Annals of Statistics 4, 1236–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brown, D. and Geanakoplos, J.: 1988, Common Knowledge without Partitions, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chellas, B.: 1980, Modal Logic: an Introduction, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fagin, R. and Halpern, J.: 1988; ‘Belief, Awareness, and Limited Reasoning’, Artificial Intelligence 34, 39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Geanakoplos, J.: 1989, Game Theory without Partitions, and Applications to Speculation and Consensus; Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 914.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kleene, Stephen C: 1967, Introduction to Metamathematics, North Holland.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lismont, L. and Mongin, P.: 1994, ‘On the Logic of Common Belief and Common Knowledge’, Theory and Decision 37, 75–106 (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Milgrom, P. and Stokey, N.: 1982, ‘Information, Trade and Common Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 26, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Modica, S. and Rustichini, A.: 1994, Unawareness: a Formal Theory of Unforeseen Contingencies, CORE DP.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rubinstein, A. and Wolinsky, A.: 1990, ‘On the Logic of “Agreeing to Disagree” Type Results’, Journal of Economic Theory 51, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Samet, D.: 1990, ‘Ignoring Ignorance and Agreeing to Disagree’, Journal of Economic Theory 52, 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    van Dalen, D.: 1983, Logic and Structure (2nd ed.); Springer-Verlag; New York-Berlin-Tokio.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Modica
    • 1
  • Aldo Rustichini
    • 2
  1. 1.Università di PalermoItaly
  2. 2.CORELouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations