Interfaces, Quantum Wells, and Superlattices pp 347-378 | Cite as
Fibonacci Superlattices
Abstract
Many of the interesting properties of semiconductor superlattices are consequences of the artificially imposed one-dimensional (1D) periodicity along the growth direction. Fibonacci semiconductor superlattices have a 1D structure along the growth direction which is quasiperiodic, i.e. it is characterized by two different fundamental periods whose ratio is irrational. Both the structural properties and the various spectral properties (e.g. plasmon, phonon and electron) are very different for quasiperiodic structures when compared to those of periodic structures. These materials provide yet another example of the enormous variety of physical phenomena which can occur in semiconductor multi-layer systems.
Keywords
Form Factor Transfer Matrix Acoustic Phonon Fibonacci Number Fibonacci SequencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.For a review of work up to 1982 see B. Simon, Adv. Appl. Math. 3, 463 (1982).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.D. Schectman, I. Bloch, D. Gratlas and J.W. Calm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.R. Merlin, K. Bajema, Roy Clarke, F.-Y. Juany and P.K. Battacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1768 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.D. Levine and P. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2477 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.M.G. Karkut, J.-M. Triscone, D. Ariosa and O. Fischer, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4390 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. Behrooz, M.J. Burns, H. Deckman, D. Levine, B. Whitehead, and P.M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 368 (1986),ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.P. Kramer and R. Neri, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 40, 580 (1984).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.P.A. Kalugin, A. Yu Kitaeu and L.C. Lerutov, Pis’ma Zhu Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41, 119 (1985) [JETP Lett. 4l, 119 (1985)].Google Scholar
- 9.V. Elser, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4892 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.M. Duneau and A. Katz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2688 (1985).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 11.R.K. Zia and W.J. Dallas, J. Phys. A 18, L341(1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.The case of the Fibonacci lattice was first worked out in detail in M.W.C. Dharmawardana, A.H. MacDonald, D.J. Lockwood, J.-M. Baribeau and D.C. Houghton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1761 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.We take the z direction to be the direction along the growth axis and write \(\mathop r\limits^\to = (\mathop {{r_\bot }}\limits^\to, z)\) and \(\mathop q\limits^\to = (\mathop {{q_\bot }}\limits^\to, {q_z})\). \(F(\mathop r\limits^\to )\) is, at this point \(F(\mathop {{r_\bot }}\limits^\to, z + d) = F(\mathop {{r_\bot }}\limits^\to, z)\). Frequently the case of interest for a superlattice is \(\mathop {{q_\bot }}\limits^\to = 0\).Google Scholar
- 14.For this calculation it is more convenient to define the form factor in terms of the charge density of the N layers centered between 0 and dx = Nxax, rather than in terms of all charge density between 0 and dx Google Scholar
- 15.J. Todd, R. Merlin, R. Clarke, K.M. Mohanty and J.D. Axe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1158 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.C. Colvard, T.A. Gant, M.V. Klein, R. Merlin, R. Fischer, H. Morkoc and A.C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2080 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.B. Jusserand and D. Paquet, in Semiconductor Heterojunctions and Superlattices, edited by N. Boccara, C. Allan, G. Bastard, M. Lannoo and M. Voss (Springer, Berlin, 1986).Google Scholar
- 18.The experiments are done in a backscattering configuration which allows scattering only by longitudinal acoustic phonons with wavevectors along the growth direction.Google Scholar
- 19.R. Merlin, K. Bajema, R. Clarke and J. Todd, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, ed. By O. Engström, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987) p. 675.Google Scholar
- 20.K. Bajema and R. Merlin, Phys. Rev. B 36, 4555 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.R. Merlin, K. Bajema, J. Nagle and K. Ploog, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Modulated Semiconductor Structures, to be published (1988).Google Scholar
- 22.D.J. Lockwood, A.H. MacDonald, G.C. Aers, M.W.C. Dharmawardana, R.L.S. Devine and W.T. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9286 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.B. Jusserand, F. Alexander, D. Paquet and G. LeRoux, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 301 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.V. Matijasevic and M.R. Beasley, Phys. Rev. B 25, 3175 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.P.G. Harper, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Sect. A 68, 874 (1955).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.D.R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.G. Andre and S. Aubrey, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980).Google Scholar
- 28.D.J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, P. Nightingale and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1198 (1983).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 30.C. Tang and M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 2041 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 31.J.B. Sokoloff, Phys. Rep. 126, 189 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32a.M. Kohmoto, L.P. Kadanoff and C. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1870 (1983)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 32b.M. Kohmoto and Y. Oono, Phys. Lett. 102A, 145 (1984)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 32c.L.P. Kadanoff and C. Tang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1276 (1984).ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 33.S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H.J. Sehnellnhuber and E. Siggia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1973 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.M. Kohmoto and J.R. Banavar, Phys. Rev. B 34, 563, (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.J.P. Lu, T. Odagaki and J.L. Birman, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4809 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.F. Nori and J.P. Rodriquez, Phys. Rev. B 34, 2207 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.T. Odagaki and L. Freidman, Solid State Commun. 57, 915 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.K. Machida and M. Fujita, Phys. Rev. B 34, 7376 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.A. Mookerjee and V.A. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 34, 7433 (1986).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 40.J.M. Luck and D. Petretis, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 289 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.M. Kohmoto, B. Sutherland and C. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 35, 1020 (1987).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 42.T. Schneider, A. Politi and D. Wurtz (preprint).Google Scholar
- 43.I. Procaccia, in Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium on Chaos and Related Problems, Phys. Scr. T 9, 40 (1985).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 44.B.B. Mandelbrot, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 225 (1977).Google Scholar
- 45.T.A. Witten, Jr. and L.M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.K.G. Wilson, Sci. Am. 241, 158 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.D. Katzen and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1169 (1987).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 48.Thomas C. Halsey, Morgens H. Jensen, Leo P. Kadanoff, Itamar Procaccia and Boris J. Shraiman., Phys. Rev. A 33 1141 (1986).ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 49.For further refinements and generalizations see L.P. Kadanoff, “Fractal singularities on a measure and how to measure singularities on a fractal.” U. of Chicago preprint, and M. Kohnioto, “Entropy Function for Multifractals.”, U. of Utah preprint.Google Scholar
- 50.The fractal dimension is defined, roughly, by, M ∝ W-F where M is the number of subbands and W is the width of each subband, For an elementary introduction to the fractional dimension concept see B.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
- 51.dT*/dq = α > 0 so T* increases monotonically with q.Google Scholar
- 52.D. Grecu, Phys. Rev. B 8, 1958 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.A.L. Fetter, Ann. Phys. (NY) 88, 1 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.S. Das Sarma and J.J. Quinn, Phys. Rev. B 25, 7603 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.S. Das Sarma, A. Kobayashi and R.E. Prange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1280 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.S. Das Sarma, A. Kobayashi and R.E. Prange, (preprint).Google Scholar
- 57.P. Hawvrylak and J.J. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 380 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.P. Hawvrylak, Gunnar Eliasson and J.J. Quinn, Phys. Rev. B 36, 6501 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.We will assume that the relevant elastic constants may be taken to have the same value in each layer of the Fibonacci semiconductor superlattice so that the change in the local sound velocity is due entirely to the change in mass density.Google Scholar
- 60.In our previous discussion of plasmons, we took the dielectric constant to the same in each layer of the Fibonacci superlattice. Both effects could be included together.Google Scholar
- 61a.M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5043 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61a.M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 2436 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.B.Y. Tong, preprint (1987).Google Scholar
- 63.G. Bastard and J.A. Brum, IEEE J. Quan. Elec. QE-22, 1625 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.A.H. MacDonald and G.C. Aers, Phys. Rev. B 36, 9142 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.M.Holzer, preprint (1987).Google Scholar
- 66.G.C. Aers, unpublished.Google Scholar