Reactor Emergency Action Level Monitor: Knowledge Acquisition Experiences

  • Robert A. Touchton

Abstract

This paper presents the Knowledge Acquisition experiences in developing the Reactor Emergency Action Level Monitor (REALM) Expert System Prototype. REALM is an expert system which interprets plant sensor data and provides advice on the proper emergency classification. The REALM project is being funded by the Electric Power Research Institute, Consolidated Edison is serving as the host utility, and the effort is being conducted by Technology Applications, Inc.

Keywords

Knowledge Engineering Knowledge Source Knowledge Engineer Electric Power Research Institute Severe Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-0654), Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emergency Plan for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1 and 2. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., version in effect July 22, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emergency Procedures Document for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1 and 2. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., version in effect October 2, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    USNRC, 1978. Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-0396, EPA 520/1–78-016. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Indian Point No. 2 Emergency Operating Procedures, E-Set Procedures. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Revision 0, January 25, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Indian Point No. 2 Emergency Operating Procedures, F-Set Procedures. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Revision 0, January 25, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Indian Point No. 2 Emergency Operating Procedures, Background Documents. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Revision 0, January 1, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Power Authority of the State of New York and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study. Amendment 2, December 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. W. Faletti, J. D. Jamison. Integration of Emergency Action Levels with Combustion Engineering Emergency Operating Procedures. September 1985. NUREG/CR-4151, PNL-5392.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Indian Point Station Unit No. 2 System Descriptions. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., version in effect February 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Appendix A to Facility Operating License DPR-26, Technical Specifications and Bases for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50–247, Amendment #93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Touchton
    • 1
  1. 1.Technology Applications, Inc.JacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations