The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis

  • Raymond B. Cattell

Abstract

The general surveys of multivariate analysis methods in other chapters in this and the first edition give some idea of the relation of factor analysis to other methods in a mathematical sense. However, factor analysis differs also in a wide, experimental, strategic sense, from, for example, both multiple-correlation linear equations, and discriminant functions, in not arbitrarily choosing a criterion variable or criterion group, but in arriving at a reduced number of abstract variables and a weighting of observed variables according to structural indications in the data itself. It is thus a means of creating concepts, not merely of employing them or checking their fit to new data, though the new methods of Maxwell, Lawley, and Jöreskog also fit it for hypothesis testing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmavaara, Y. Transformation analysis of factorial data. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae Series B, 1985, 88, 2.Google Scholar
  2. Apport, G. W. Personality, New York: Holt, 1937.Google Scholar
  3. Baggaley, A. R., and Cattell, R. B. A comparison of exact and approximate linear function estimates of oblique factor scores. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1956, 9, 83–86.Google Scholar
  4. Bargmann, R. A comparison of new analytic methods for the determination of simple structure. Frankfurt am Main: Hochschule fuer Internationale Paedagogische Forschung, 1953a (mimeographed).Google Scholar
  5. Bargmann, R. The statistical significance of simple structure in factor analysis. Frankfurt am Main: Hochschule fuer Internationale Paedagogische Forschung, 1953b (mimeographed).Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, M. Internal and external factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 1948, 1, 73–81.Google Scholar
  7. Bechtoldt, H. P. An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 405–432.Google Scholar
  8. Bechtoldt, H. P. Factor analysis and the investigation of hypotheses. Perceptual Motor Skills, 1962, 14, 319–342.Google Scholar
  9. Bechtoldt, H. P., Benton, A. L., and Fogel, M. L. An application of factor analysis in neuropsychology. Psychological Record, 1962, 12, 147–156.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, W. C. A comparison of the factor structure and other properties of the 16 P.F. and the Guilford–Martin personality inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1961, 21, 383–404.Google Scholar
  11. Broverman, D. M. Effects of score transformations in Q and R factor analysis techniques. Psychological Review, 1961, 68, 68–80.Google Scholar
  12. Broverman, D. M. Normative and ipsative measurement in psychology. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 295–305.Google Scholar
  13. Brunswik, E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  14. Burt, C. L. Correlations between persons. British Journal of Psychology, 1937, 28, 59–96.Google Scholar
  15. Burt, C. L. The factors of the mind: An introduction to factor analysis in psychology. New York: Macmillan Co., 1941.Google Scholar
  16. Burt, C. L. Tests of significance in factor studies. British Journal of Psychology, 1952, 5, 109–133.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll, J. B. Oblimin rotation solution in factor analysis. Computing program for the IBM 704. Harvard University, 1958.Google Scholar
  19. Cattell, R. B. “Parallel proportional profiles” and other principles for determining the choice of factors by rotation. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 267–283.Google Scholar
  20. Cattell, R. B. The diagnosis and classification of neurotic states: A reinterpretation of Eysenck’s factors. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1945, 102, 576–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cattell, R. B. The description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book, 1946.Google Scholar
  22. Cattell, R. B. A note on factor invariance and the identification of factors. British Journal of Psychology, 1949, 2, 134–138.Google Scholar
  23. Cattell, R. B. Personality: A systematical, theoretical, and factual study. New York: McGraw–Hlll, 1950.Google Scholar
  24. Cattell, R. B. Factor analysis. New York: Harper, 1952a.Google Scholar
  25. Cattell, R. B. The three basic factor analytic research designs—Their interrelationships and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 1952b, 49, 499–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cattell, R. B. Growing points in factor analysis, Australian Journal of Psychology, 1954, 6, 105–140.Google Scholar
  27. Cattell, R. B. Validation and intensification of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1956, 12, 205–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cattell, R. B. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. New York: World Book, 1957.Google Scholar
  29. Cattell, R. B. The dynamic calculus: A system of concepts derived from objective motivation measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), The assessment of human motives. New York: Reinehart, 1958a.Google Scholar
  30. Cattell, R. B. Extracting the correct number of factors in factor analysis. Educational Psychological Measurement, 1958b, 18, 791–838.Google Scholar
  31. Cattell, R. B. The dynamic calculus: Concepts and crucial experiments. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium of motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  32. Cattell, R. B. Theory of situational, instrument, second order, and refraction factors in personality structure research. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 160–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cattell, R. B. The basis of recognition and interpretation of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962, 22, 667–697.Google Scholar
  34. Cattell, R. B. Personality, role, mood, and situation-perception: A unifying theory of modulators. Psychological Review, 1963a, 70, 1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cattell, R. B. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963b, 54, 1–22.Google Scholar
  36. Cattell, R. B. The configurative method for surer identification of personality dimensions, notably in child study. Psychological Reports, 1965a, 16, 269–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cattell, R. B. Higher order structures: Reticular vs. hierarchical formulae for their interpretation. In C. Banks and P. L. Broadhurst (Eds.), Studies in psychology. London: University of London Press, 1965h.Google Scholar
  38. Cattell, R. B. Cultural and political-economic psychology. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966a.Google Scholar
  39. Cattell, R. B. The scree test of the number of significant factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966b, 1, 140–161.Google Scholar
  40. Cattell, R. B. The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Praeger, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. Cattell, R. B. Personality and learning theory. Vol. 1. New York: Springer, 1979.Google Scholar
  42. Cattell, R. B. Personality and learning theory. Vol. 2, New York: Springer, 1980.Google Scholar
  43. Cattell, R. B., and Baggaley, A. R. The salient variable similarity index for factor matching. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960, 13, 33–46.Google Scholar
  44. Cattell, R. B., and Brennan, J. The confactor approximation to an oblique solution. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1977, 3, 103–110.Google Scholar
  45. Cattell, R. B., and Brennan, J. The effects of factoring ipsatzed scores, 1987 (in press).Google Scholar
  46. Cattell, R. B., and Cattell, A. K. S. Factor rotation for proportional profiles: Analytical solution and an example. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 83–92.Google Scholar
  47. Cattell, R. B., and Coulter, M. A. Principles of behavioral taxonomy and the taxonome program. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 237–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Cattell, R. B., and Dickman, K. A dynamic model of physical influences demonstrating the necessity of oblique simple structure. Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 389–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Cattell, R. B., and Digman, J. A theory of the structure of perturbations in observer ratings and questionnaire data in personality research. Behavioral Science, 1964, 9, 341–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Cattell, R. B., and Foster, M. J. The rotoplot program for multiple single-plane, visually-guided rotation. Behavioral Science, 1963, 8, 156–165.Google Scholar
  51. Cattell, R. B., and Gorsuch, R. L. The uniqueness and significance of simple structure demonstrated by contrasting organic “natural structure” and “random structure” data. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 55–67.Google Scholar
  52. Cattell, R. B., and Jaspars, J. A general plasmode (No. 30-10-5-2) for factor analytic exercises and researches. Monograph of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (Whole No. 3), 1967.Google Scholar
  53. Cattell, R. B., and Muerle, J. L. The “maxplane” program for factor rotation to oblique simple structure. Educational and Psychological Meausrement, 1960, 20, 569–590.Google Scholar
  54. Cattell, R. B., and Nesselroade, J. R. The “fidelity” plasmode, with known higher order structure and error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1987 (in press).Google Scholar
  55. Cattell, R. B., and Raymond, J. S. The spectrad model for attribution research: An extension of trait view theory. Interdisciplinaria, 1982, 3, 135–154.Google Scholar
  56. Cattell, R. B., and Scheier, I. H. Factors in personality change: A discussion of the condition—response incremental design and application to 69 personality response measures and three stimulus conditions. Urbana: University of Illinois, Laboratory for Personality Assessment and Group Behavior, 1958.Google Scholar
  57. Cattell, R. B., and Scheier, I. H. The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  58. Cattell, R. B., and Sullivan, W. The scientific nature of factors: A demonstration by cups of coffee. Behavioral Science, 1962, 7, 184–193.Google Scholar
  59. Cattell, R. B., Stice, G. F., and Eber, M. The 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1949.Google Scholar
  60. Coombs, C. M., and Kao, R. C. Nonmetric factor analysis. Bulletin of the Department of Engineering Research, No. 38. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1955.Google Scholar
  61. Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297–334.Google Scholar
  62. Eber, H. W. Toward oblique simple structure: A new version of Cattell’s Maxplane Rotation Program for the 7094. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966, 1, 112–125.Google Scholar
  63. Eysenck, H. J. Dimensions of personality. London: Kegan Paul, 1947.Google Scholar
  64. Eysenck, H. J. Experiments in personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.Google Scholar
  65. Gibson, W. A. Non-linear factors in two dimensions. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 381–392.Google Scholar
  66. Gorsuch, R. L. Factor analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984.Google Scholar
  67. Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 277–296.Google Scholar
  68. Harman, H. Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  69. Harris, C. W. Some Rao—Guttman relationships. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 247–263.Google Scholar
  70. Harris, C. W., and Kaiser, H. F. Oblique factor analysis solutions by orthogonal transformations. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 347–362.Google Scholar
  71. Hakstian, R., Rogers, W., and Cattell, R. B. The behavior of number of factor rules with simulated data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982, 17, 193–219.Google Scholar
  72. Hendrickson, A. F., and White, P. O. PROMAX: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17, 65–70.Google Scholar
  73. Henrysson, S. Applicability of factor analysis in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1957.Google Scholar
  74. Horn, J. L. On the estimation of factor scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1964, 24, 525–527.Google Scholar
  75. Horn, J. F. Summing up: Evaluation of the evolution of a psychological theory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1984, 19, 337–343.Google Scholar
  76. Horst, P. Matrix algebra for social scientists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
  77. Horst, P. Factor analysis of data matrices. New York: Holt, 1965.Google Scholar
  78. Humphreys, L. G. Characteristics of type concepts with special reference to Sheldon’s typology. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 218–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Humphreys, L. G. The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 475–483.Google Scholar
  80. Hundleby, J. D., Pawlik, K., and Cattell, R. B. Personality factors in objective test devices. San Diego: Knapp, 1965.Google Scholar
  81. Hurley, J. R., and Cattell, R. B. The Procrustes Program: Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behavioral Science, 1962, 7, 258–262.Google Scholar
  82. Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 443–482.Google Scholar
  83. Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, Mass.: ABT Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  84. Kaiser, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187–200.Google Scholar
  85. Kaiser, H. F. Relating factors between studies based upon different individuals. Unpublished manuscript, 1960.Google Scholar
  86. Kaiser, H. F. Image analysis. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  87. Kaiser, H. F., and Caffrey, J. Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Kaiser, H. F., and Dickman, K. W. Analytic determination of common factors. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 425.Google Scholar
  89. Kline, P. The use of the Cattell 16PF and Eysenck’s EPI in Ghana. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1984, 6, 97–107.Google Scholar
  90. Landahi, H. D. Centroid orthogonal transformations. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 219–223.Google Scholar
  91. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1940, 60, 64–82.Google Scholar
  92. Lawley, D. N. Tests of significance for the latent roots of covariance and correlation matrices. Biometrika, 1956, 43, 128–136.Google Scholar
  93. Lawley, D. N., and Maxwell, A. E. Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworths, 1963.Google Scholar
  94. McNemar, Q. On the sampling errors of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 141–152.Google Scholar
  95. Overall, J. E. A common solution for transposed factor analyses. Privately circulated manuscript, 1964.Google Scholar
  96. Peterson, D. R. The scope and generality of verbally defined personality factors. Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 48–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Pinzka, C., and Saunders, D. R. Analytic rotation to simple structure. II. Extension to an oblique solution (RB-54–31). Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1954 (multilithed).Google Scholar
  98. Rao, C. R. Estimation and test of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–111.Google Scholar
  99. Ross, J. Informational coverage and correlational analysis. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 297–306.Google Scholar
  100. Ross, J. The relation between test and person factors. Psychological Review, 1963, 70, 432–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Rummel, R. J. Dimensions of nations. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
  102. Saunders, D. R. Factor analysis. I. Some effects of chance error. Psychometrika, 1948, 13, 251–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Saunders, D. R. Practical methods in the direct factor analysis of psychological score matrices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1950.Google Scholar
  104. Saunders, D. R. Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956, 16, 209–222.Google Scholar
  105. Schmid, J., and Leiman, J. M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 53–61.Google Scholar
  106. Schoenemann, P. M. A solution with applications to orthogonal and oblique rotation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1964.Google Scholar
  107. Sokal, R. R. A comparison of five tests for completeness of factor extraction. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Sciences, 1959, 62, 141–152.Google Scholar
  108. Stephenson, W. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  109. Thomson, G. M. The factorial analysis of human ability. Boston: Houghton—Mifflin, 1939.Google Scholar
  110. Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1938, No. 1.Google Scholar
  111. Thurstone, L. L. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  112. Tryon, R. C. Cluster analysis: Correlation profile and orthometric (factor) analysis for the isolation of unities in mind and personality. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Edwards, 1939.Google Scholar
  113. Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analysis study. Department Army A.G.O., Personnel Research, Section Report No. 984, 1955.Google Scholar
  114. Tucker, L. R. Factor analysis of double centered score matrices. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, September 1956.Google Scholar
  115. Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 111–137.Google Scholar
  116. Whittle, P. On principle components and least square methods of factor analysis. Skandinavisk Aktvar, 1952, 35, 223–239.Google Scholar
  117. Wrigley, C., Saunders, D. R., and Neuhaus, J. O. Application of the Quartimax method of rotation to Thurstone’s primary mental abilities study. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 151–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond B. Cattell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations